纺织学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (02): 103-108.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20181101806

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于汉风色典的不同色差公式的色差均匀性

杨红英1,2(), 惠志奎1, 杨志晖3, 张靖晶1, 谢宛姿1, 周金利1   

  1. 1.中原工学院 纺织学院, 郑州 河南 451191
    2.中原工学院 纺织服装产业河南省协同创新中心,郑州 河南 451191
    3.中原工学院 纺织服装产业研究院, 郑州 河南 451191
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-20 修回日期:2019-09-23 出版日期:2020-02-15 发布日期:2020-02-21
  • 作者简介:杨红英(1970—),女,教授,博士。主要研究方向为纺织色彩学。E-mail: webyhy@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(61440064)

Uniformity of main color-difference formulas based on Sino Color Book

YANG Hongying1,2(), HUI Zhikui1, YANG Zhihui3, ZHANG Jingjing1, XIE Wanzi1, ZHOU Jinli1   

  1. 1. College of Textiles, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 451191, China
    2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Textile and Garment Industry, Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou, Henan 451191, China
    3. Textile and Apparel Industry Institute, Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou, Henan 451191, China
  • Received:2018-11-20 Revised:2019-09-23 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-21

摘要:

为给纺织行业在纺织品贸易和质量控制等方面优选色差公式提供参考,研究了3个重要的和1个最新色差公式的色差均匀性,借助国际上色样多、视觉等距性好的汉风色典,利用X-Rite测色仪测试近2万个色样的色度参数,然后分别从向度、彩度、浓度3个方向选取3万多对相邻色样,采用MatLab编程计算4种色差并统计分析其均值、不匀率和性能因子。结果表明:不同方向不同评价指标所得结果不尽相同;在色差均匀性方面,CAM16-UCS最好,CIEDE2000(2∶1∶1)略优于CMC(2∶1),且二者明显优于CIELAB;在色差大小方面由小到大依次为CIEDE2000(2∶1∶1)、CMC(2∶1)、CAM16-UCS、CIELAB。

关键词: 汉风色典, 色差公式, 色差均匀性, 织物

Abstract:

In order to provide a reference for more suitable color difference formulae for textile industry in trade and quality control, the uniformity of 3 main and 1 newest formulas was studied by utilizing Sino Color Book (SCB) with the largest number of internaterial samples (nearly 20 000) and good visually equidistance, their chromaticity parameters were measured by the X-Rite spectrophotometer, and then more than 30 000 pairs of adjacent color samples in SCB were selected from three directions of hue, chroma and depth, respectively. Their color differences were computed by MatLab programming and their statistic data of average, and CV values and performance factor were analyzed. Results show that different evaluation indexes in different directions exhibit different effect. For the uniformity of the 4 color different formulas: CAM16-UCS is the best, and CIEDE2000(2∶1∶1) is slightly better than CMC(2∶1), and both are obviously better than CIELAB. For the value order of the 4 color differences: CIEDE2000(2∶1∶1) < CMC(2∶1) < CAM16-UCS < CIELAB.

Key words: Sino Color Book, color different formula, uniformity of color-difference, fabric

中图分类号: 

  • TS197

图1

汉风色典的色立体示意图"

图2

汉风色典的色相表(SCB色立体的横截面)"

图3

汉风色典的浓度表"

表1

4个色差公式计算的SCB色卡的平均值对比"

变化
方向
样品数
量/对
不同色差公式计算的色差平均值
CIELAB CMC(2∶1) CIE2000(2∶1∶1) CAM16-
UCS
向度 17 917 2.19 1.93 1.72 1.85
浓度 17 160 3.00 1.52 1.37 2.90
彩度 2 064 2.69 1.87 1.64 1.98
总平均 2.59 1.74 1.55 2.34
极差(排序) 0.81(3) 0.41(2) 0.34(1) 1.05(4)

表2

4个色差公式计算的SCB色卡的标准差系数及性能因子对比"

变化方向 CIELAB CMC(2∶1) CIE2000 (2∶1∶1) CAM16-
UCS
Vσ 向度 38.13(4) 35.16(2) 35.66(3) 31.75(1)
浓度 20.36(2) 27.95(4) 24.90(3) 20.06(1)
彩度 64.85(4) 33.00(2) 32.02(1) 45.97(3)
Vσ排序
之和
10 8 7 5
PF/3 向度 39.89(4) 38.19(2) 39.41(3) 34.55(1)
浓度 27.01(1) 32.11(4) 29.61(3) 27.78(2)
彩度 57.35(4) 30.88(1) 31.25(2) 40.54(3)
PF/3
序之和
9 7 8 6
综合排序之和 19 15 15 11
[1] 董振礼, 郑宝海, 轷桂芬, 等. 测色与计算机配色[M].3版. 北京:中国纺织出版社, 2017: 48-49.
DONG Zhenli, ZHENG Baohai, FU Guifen, et al. Color measurement and computer color matching[M]. 3th ed. Beijing:China Textile & Apparel Press, 2017: 48-49.
[2] 马志尔. 纺织品颜色测量的应用和进展[J]. 现代商检科技, 1994,4(1):1-4.
MA Zhier. Application and progress of textile color measurement[J]. Modern Commodity Inspection Science and Technique, 1994,4(1):1-4.
[3] ROBERTSON A R. The CIE 1976 color-difference formulae[J]. Color Research & Application, 1977,2(1):7-11.
[4] LUO M R, RIGG B. Chromaticity-discrimination ellipses for surface colours[J]. Color Research & Application, 1986,11(1):25-42.
[5] 郑元林, 杨淑蕙, 周世生, 等. CIE1976LAB色差公式的均匀性研究[J]. 包装工程, 2005,26(2):48-49.
ZHENG Yuanlin, YANG Shuhui, ZHOU Shisheng, et al. Research on uniformity of CIE1976LAB color difference formula[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2005,26(2):48-49.
[6] CLARKE F J J, MCDONALD R, RIGG B. Modification to the JPC79 colour difference formula[J]. Coloration Technology, 1984,100(4):128-132.
[7] MCDONALD R, SMITH K J. CIE94: a new colour difference formula[J]. Coloration Technology, 1995,111(12):376-379.
[8] LUO M R, CUI G, RIGG B. The development of the CIE2000 colour difference formula: CIEDE2000[J]. Color Research & Application, 2001,26(5):340-350.
[9] EBNER F, FAIRCHILD M D. Development and testing of a color space (IPT) with improved hue unifor-mity[C]// 6th Color imaging conference. Scottsdale: Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 1998: 8-13.
[10] LUO M R, CUI G, LI C. Uniform colour spaces based on CIECAM02 colour appearance model[J]. Color Resarch & Application, 2006,31(4):320-330.
[11] MACADAM D L. Uniform color scales[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1974,64(12):1691-1702.
doi: 10.1364/josa.64.001691 pmid: 4443840
[12] OLEAR Claudio, MELGOSA Manuel, HUERTAS Rafael. Euclidean color difference formula for small-medium color differences in log-compressed OSA-UCS space[J]. Journal of the optical society of America, 2009,26(1):121-134.
doi: 10.1364/josaa.26.000121 pmid: 19109608
[13] LI Changjun, LI Zhiqiang, WANG Zhifeng, et al. Comprehensive color solutions: CAM16, CAT16, and CAM 16‐UCS[J]. Color Research & Application, 2017,42(1):703-718.
[14] 郑元林, 杨淑蕙, 周世生, 等. 色差公式CMC(l:c)、CIE94和CIEDE2000的对比研究[J]. 包装工程, 2006,27(5):127-128.
ZHENG Yuanlin, YANG Shuhui, ZHOU Shisheng, et al. Comparative studies on CMC(l:c), CIE94 and CIEDE2000 color difference formulae[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2006,27(5):127-128.
[15] 刘浩学. 用Munsell颜色检验色差公式[C]//中国光学学会2004年学术大会论文集. 杭州: 中国光学学会, 2004: 23-26
LIU Haoxue. Checking color difference formulae with Munsell color[C]//Proceedings of the Chinese optical Society 2004 Conference. Hangzhou: The Chinese Optical Society, 2004: 23-26.
[16] 黄敏, 廖宁放, 徐艳芳. 基于中国颜色体系的色差公式分析[J]. 光学技术, 2007,33(s1):46-48.
HUANG Min, LIAO Ningfang, XU Yanfang. Analysis of color difference formulae with the Chinese color sys-tem[J]. Optical Technique, 2007,33(s1):46-48.
[17] 张靖晶. 关于计算机配色的几个重要基础问题的研究[D]. 郑州: 中原工学院, 2019: 34-36.
ZHANG Jingjing. Research on several important basic problems of computer color matching[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhongyuan University of Technology, 2019: 34-36.
[18] 何国兴. 颜色科学[M]. 上海:东华大学出版, 2004, 133-134.
HE Guoxing. Color science[M]. Shanghai:Donghua University Press, 2004: 133-134.
[19] GARCIA P A, HUERTAS R, MELGOSA M, et al. Measurement of the relationship between perceived and computed color differences[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2007,24(7):1823-1829.
doi: 10.1364/josaa.24.001823 pmid: 17728805
[1] 张昭华, 唐香宁, 李俊, 李璐瑶. 织物与皮肤动态接触下的湿感觉阈限与强度评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 93-100.
[2] 孟朔, 夏旭文, 潘如如, 周建, 王蕾, 高卫东. 基于卷积神经网络的机织物密度均匀性检测[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 101-106.
[3] 郝尚, 谢源, 翁佳丽, 张维, 姚继明. 溶解刻蚀辅助构建棉织物超疏水表面[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 168-173.
[4] 肖彩勤, 孙丰鑫, 高卫东. 基于屈诱多形态力学测试的织物外观平整度表征[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 80-86.
[5] 黄笛, 李芳, 李刚. 涤纶/ 蚕丝机织心脏瓣膜的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 74-79.
[6] 孙亚博, 李立军, 马崇启, 吴兆南, 秦愈. 基于ABAQUS 的筒状纬编针织物拉伸力学性能模拟[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 107-112.
[7] 刘立东, 李新荣, 刘汉邦, 李丹丹. 服装面料静电吸附抓取转移电极板优化设计[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 185-192.
[8] 刘海桑, 蒋高明, 董智佳. 基于Web 的少梳经编色织物仿真与虚拟展示[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 87-92.
[9] 张雪飞, 李婷婷, 许炳铨, 林佳弘, 楼静文. 用低温界面聚合法制备多功能核壳结构热电织物[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 174-179.
[10] 娄娅娅, 王静, 董燕超, 王春梅. 粘胶基沸石咪唑骨架材料的制备及其对染料的脱色[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 142-147.
[11] 蔡露, 康佳良, 吕存, 何雪梅. 自交联氟化聚丙烯酸酯乳液的制备及其应用性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 161-167.
[12] 侯文双, 闵洁, 纪峰, 张建祥, 苏梦, 何瑞娴. 织物紧度和抗皱整理工艺对纯棉机织物折皱回复性的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 118-124.
[13] 鲁鹏, 洪思思, 林旭, 李慧, 刘国金, 周岚, 邵建中, 柴丽琴. 活性染料/聚苯乙烯复合胶体微球的制备及其在桑蚕丝织物上的结构生色[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 90-95.
[14] 于佳, 辛斌杰, 卓婷婷, 周曦. 高导电性铜/聚吡咯涂层羊毛织物的制备与表征[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 112-117.
[15] 曾凡鑫, 秦宗益, 沈玥莹, 陈园余, 胡铄. 自熄性棉织物的喷涂辅助层层自组装法制备及其阻燃性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 103-111.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!