纺织学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 33-37.

• 纺织工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

内衣织物刺痒感的评价方法

  

  • 收稿日期:2016-01-05 修回日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2016-12-15 发布日期:2016-12-21

Evaluation method of prickle sensation evoked by underwear fabrics

  • Received:2016-01-05 Revised:2016-06-06 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2016-12-21

摘要:

为从物理、心理和生理3 个方面系统研究内衣织物刺痒感的评价方法,对14 种常见内衣织物表面毛羽的直径和长度进行测量,利用皮肤电反应进行刺痒感生理评价,并对刺痒感进行主观评价。研究结果表明:织物表面毛羽轴向弯曲压缩是引起刺痒感的主要原因;纤维种类、纤维长径比是影响刺痒感的重要因素;羊毛纤维易引发刺痒感且羊毛纤维含量越高刺痒感越强烈;织物刺痒感越强烈,织物与人体皮肤接触时越易引起交感神经兴奋,交感神经支配汗腺分泌汗液,皮肤电阻变小,从而导致皮肤电导率增大,因此,皮肤电反应可作为刺痒感的生理评价方法。

关键词: 内衣织物, 刺痒感, 纤维性状, 皮肤电反应

Abstract:

In order to explore evaluation methods of prickle sensation evoked by underwear fabrics from the physical, psychological adn physiological aspects. Fabric surface hairiness diameter and length of 14 kinds of common underwear were tested. Subjective assessment and Galvanic skin response was used to evaluate prickle sensation of underwear fabrics. The ersult shows that the fabric surface hairiness of axial bending compression is the main cause of the prickle sensation. Fiber types and diameter and length of fiber are important factors affecting prickle sensation. Wool fiber often leads to prickle sensation easily, and the higher of the wool fiber content, the more intense prickle. It finds that the more intense prickle of fabric, the sympathetic nervous excitement gets excited more easily when skin contacts with the fabric. Sympathetic innervation of sweat glands secretes sweat causing skin resistance decreases. As a result, it causes increases on skin conductivity. Therefore, galvanic skin response can be as the physiological evaluation method of prickle sensation.

Key words: rnderwear fabric, prickle sensation, fiber trait, galvanic skin response

[1] 李甜甜 黄江峰 邵建中. 苎麻织物的纤维素酶与聚氨酯联合抗刺痒整理技术[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(03): 76-0.
[2] 凌群民;谭磊. 后整理工艺对纯苎麻针织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(7): 91-96.
[3] 李丽君;崔鸿钧. 苎麻织物结构设计若干问题探讨[J]. 纺织学报, 2007, 28(4): 34-37.
[4] 戚媛;刘宇清;于伟东. 羊毛粗细对织物刺痒感影响的客观评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2005, 26(3): 12-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!