Journal of Textile Research ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 134-140.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20180605107

• Dyeing and Finishing & Chemicals • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Improvement of friction performance of polyester interlacement yarn linen-like fabric

WU Shufang1, ZHANG Tingting1, HASAN Md Rokibul1, CHEN Yiren1,2()   

  1. 1. School of Textile Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, Hubei 430200, China
    2. State Key Laboratory for Hubei New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430200, China
  • Received:2018-06-15 Revised:2019-07-20 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-10-23
  • Contact: CHEN Yiren E-mail:yiren.chen@wtu.edu.cn.

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

133

Abstract:

To improve the poor friction performance of the polyester interlacement yarn linen-like fabric, the influence factors such as fiber, yarn, and fabric structure on the pilling performance and abrasion resistance of the fabrics were analyzed, and a resin finishing process for improving the friction performance of the polyester interlacement yarn linen-like fabric was studied and developed. Process parameters such as the concentration of resin, the temperature of treatment bath, the baking temperature, the baking time, and the concentration of the softener were optimized, and the best finishing process of the polyester interlacement yarn linen-like fabric were the concentration of the resin of 50 g/L,the temperature of the treatment bath of 40℃, the baking temperature of 100℃ with baking time for 4 min and the softener concentration of 3 g/L. After the optinal finishing process with 40 000 rubbing cycles, the weight loss of the fabric was reduced from 12.13% to 5.34%. And the pilling performance was improved from grade 1 to grade 3-4 while the fabric basically keeps the original hand feeling.

Key words: polyester interlacement yarn linen-like fabric, abrasion resistance, pilling performance, resin finishing

CLC Number: 

  • TS102.2

Fig.1

SEM images of polyester linnet fiber(×500). (a)Transverse; (b)Longitudinal"

Tab.1

Experimental results of fiber strength"

组别 强力平均值/cN 强力CV值/%
第1组 11.78 10.88
第2组 11.97 9.27
第3组 12.25 9.04
第4组 11.80 9.12
第5组 10.90 9.43

Tab.2

Experimental results of yarn abrasive resistance"

组别 强力平均
值/cN		 强力CV
值/%		 组别 强力平
均值/cN		 强力CV
值/%
第1组 403.8 15.03 第6组 362.5 25.53
第2组 339.5 17.59 第7组 296.8 18.43
第3组 362.1 23.65 第8组 276.5 20.69
第4组 321.5 19.33 第9组 443.7 32.03
第5组 386.1 17.09 第10组 363.2 29.20

Tab.3

Experimental results of yarn abrasive resistance"

组别 强力平均值/cN 强力CV值/%
第1组 516.8 12.22
第2组 547.5 13.58
第3组 588.5 13.98
第4组 602.9 14.79
第5组 547.7 11.06

Tab.4

Effect of finishing concentration on friction performance of polyester fabric"

树脂整理剂质量
浓度/(g·L-1)		 摩擦40 000次的质量
损失率/%		 起毛起球
等级/级
20 6.03 3
30 5.74 3
40 5.68 3~4
50 5.46 3~4
70 6.15 4

Tab.5

Effect of bath temperature on friction properties of polyester fabric"

处理液温
度/℃		 摩擦40 000次的质量
损失率/%		 起毛起球
等级/级
20 7.32 3~4
30 6.64 3~4
40 5.46 3~4
50 5.76 3~4
60 5.79 3~4

Tab.6

Effect of baking temperature on friction properties of polyester fabric"

焙烘温
度/℃		 摩擦40 000次的
质量损失率/%		 起毛起
球等级/级
80 6.31 3~4
100 5.48 3~4
120 5.46 3~4
140 5.65 4
160 6.19 4~5

Tab.7

Effect of baking time on friction properties of polyester fabric"

焙烘时
间/min		 摩擦40 000次的
质量损失率/%		 起毛起球
等级/级
1 6.34 3~4
2 5.68 3~4
3 5.46 3~4
4 5.44 3~4
5 5.43 3~4

Tab.8

Effect of softener concentration on friction properties of polyester fabric"

柔软剂质量浓度/
(g·L-1)		 摩擦40 000次的
质量损失率/%		 起毛起球
等级/级
0 8.05 4~5
1 7.65 4
2 5.76 3~4
3 5.46 3~4
4 5.92 2~3

Tab.9

Results of five factors and four levels orthogonal test"

序号 A
树脂整理剂质
量浓度/(g·L-1)		 B
处理液温
度/℃		 C
焙烘温
度/℃		 D
焙烘时
间/min		 E
柔软剂质量
浓度/(g·L-1)		 摩擦40 000
次质量损
失率/%		 起毛起球
等级/级
1 70 20 80 2 1 5.40 3~4
2 70 30 100 3 2 4.62 4
3 70 40 120 4 3 4.08 4
4 70 50 140 5 4 5.27 3~4
5 50 20 100 4 4 4.93 3~4
6 50 30 80 5 3 4.42 4
7 50 40 140 2 2 5.67 3~4
8 50 50 120 3 1 6.35 4
9 40 20 120 5 2 6.48 3~4
10 40 30 140 4 1 5.66 3~4
11 40 40 80 3 4 5.13 3~4
12 40 50 100 2 3 5.28 3~4
13 30 20 140 3 3 6.26 3
14 30 30 120 2 4 5.99 3
15 30 40 100 5 1 5.50 3~4
16 30 50 80 4 2 6.21 3~4

Tab.10

Mean and range values of indexes"

指标 A B C D E
40 000
次摩擦
质量损
失率/%		 k1 4.84 5.77 5.29 5.59 5.73
k2 5.34 5.17 5.08 5.84 5.75
k3 5.64 5.10 5.73 5.22 5.01
k4 5.99 5.78 5.72 5.42 5.33
R 1.15 0.68 0.64 0.62 0.74
起毛
起球
等级		 k5 3.75 3.38 3.63 3.38 3.63
k6 3.75 3.63 3.63 3.63 3.63
k7 3.50 3.63 3.63 3.63 3.63
k8 3.25 3.63 3.38 3.63 3.38
R 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25

Fig.2

SEM images of polyester linnet fiber structure(×200). (a) Before resin finishing; (b) After resin finiching"

Tab.11

Effect of fabric performance before and after resin finishing"

实验
方案		 摩擦40 000
次后质量
损失率/%		 起毛起球
等级/级		 断裂强
力/N		 断裂伸
长率/%		 手感等
级/级
未处理 12.13 1 1 205.8 48.2 4
树脂整理 5.34 3~4 1 310.7 47.5 3~4
[1] 徐奇鹏, 王春燕, 于汉青, 等. 低缩率涤纶合股网络复合丝的生产工艺[J]. 合成纤维, 2017,46(4):29-30.
XU Qipeng, WANG Chunyan, YU Hanqing, et al. Production process of polyester intermingled textured yarn with low-shrinkage[J]. Synthetic Fiber in China, 2017,46(4):29-30.
[2] 张守斌, 邢明杰, 周绪波, 等. 毛/粘胶/涤纶喷气涡流纱的开发及成纱性能分析[J]. 毛纺科技, 2009,37(1):27-30.
ZHANG Shoubin, XING Mingjie, ZHOU Xubo, et al. Development of wool/viscose/polyester three components MVS yarn and its property analysis[J]. Wool Textile Journal, 2009,37(1):27-30.
[3] 唐新军, 宋均燕, 何小东, 等. 不同纺纱方法的成纱机理及纱线耐磨性能研究[J]. 棉纺织技术, 2015(7):17-21.
TANG Xinjun, SONG Junyan, HE Xiaodong, et al. Yarn-forming principle and yarn abrasion property analysis of different spinning method[J]. Cotton Textile Technology, 2015(7):17-21.
[4] 周方利, 孙润君. 织物组织结构及上机纬密对其耐磨性的影响分析[J]. 轻纺工业与技术, 2011 (1):21-22.
ZHOU Fangli, SUN Runjun. Effect of structure and weft density on fabrics abrasion resistance[J]. Light Textile Industry and Technology, 2011 (1):21-22.
[5] 万爱兰, 于伟东, 蒋高明. 起毛起球表征技术的研究进展与问题[J]. 纺织学报, 2014,35(5):157-164.
WAN Ailan, YU Weidong, JIANG Gaoming. Research progress and existing problems about characterizing fuzzing and pilling[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2014,35(5):157-164.
[6] 那英, 杨福斌, 陈运能. 聚氨酯涂层棉织物性能研究[J]. 棉纺织技术, 2017 (6):34-36.
NA Ying, YANG Fubin, CHEN Yunneng. Property study of polyurethane coated cotton fabric[J]. Cotton Textile Technology, 2017,45(6):34-36.
[7] ROSACE G, CANTON R, COLLEONI C. Plasma enhanced CVD of SiOxCyHz thin film on different textile fabrics: influence of exposure time on the abrasion resistance and mechanical properties[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2010,256(8):2509-2516.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.10.097
[8] BRZEZI$\acute{H}$SKI S, KOWALCZYK D, BORAK B, et al. Nanocoat finishing of polyester/cotton fabrics by the sol-gel method to improve their wear resistance[J]. Fibers & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 2011,19(6):83-88.
[9] BRZEZI$\acute{H}$SKI S, KOWALCZYK D, BORAK B,M. et al. Applying the sol-gel method to the deposition of nanocoats on textiles to improve their abrasion resistance[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2012,125(4):3058-3067.
doi: 10.1002/app.v125.4
[10] 范万超. “雾聚合”法用于增强纺织面料耐磨性能的研究[D]. 杭州:浙江理工大学, 2016: 2-30.
FAN Wanchao. Study of “mist polymerization” for improving abrasion resistance of textiles[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 2016: 2-30.
[1] . Influence of sizing agent on surface and weaving performance of SiC fibers [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(03): 78-84.
[2] . Size-free sizing process for cellulosic yarns [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2016, 37(2): 85-91.
[3] Lian-Jun WANG. Process optimization of moisture crosslinking and infouence thereof on properties of textile [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2013, 34(5): 86-89.
[4] LING Ming-Hua, ZHANG Hui. Electroless Ag-TiO2 (nanometer) composite coating on PET fabric [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2011, 32(12): 103-107.
[5] SUN Hong-wen;CHEN Qing-guan . Cohesion testing method and equipment of raw silk [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2005, 26(1): 80-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备14006648号
Copyright 2021 © Editorial office of Journal of Textile Research
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd