碳交易及消费补贴下的服装行业碳减排决策问题

doi:10.13475/j.fzxb.20210910508

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在“双碳”目标下,全国碳交易市场悄然上线,为使服装企业更好地应对碳交易,建立由原料供应商、制造商、零售商和回收商组成的服装闭环供应链模型,着重探讨了政府对再制造服装消费者补贴及制造商碳减排投资对服装行业发展、供应链成员利润及供应链碳排放总量的影响等。研究发现:随着碳交易价格的上涨,若无减排及无补贴,服装企业难以长久维系;仅制造商投资减排的情形有利于增加传统服装、再制造服装的需求及供应链成员的利润,但同时也会刺激碳排放;既减排又补贴时,再制造消费补贴可提升制造商的最优减排率,增强再制造服装的竞争优势,降低供应链的碳排放总量;本文研究可为碳交易下服装生产企业碳减排投资决策及政府的政策制定提供指导和参考。

关键词: 碳交易, 政府消费补贴, 碳减排投资, 再制造服装, 服装闭环供应链

Abstract:

With the promotion of the "dual carbon" target, the national carbon trade market has been launched without causing much attention. In order to make clothing enterprises better respond to carbon trading policy, the clothing closed-loop supply chain model was established, which was composed of raw material suppliers, manufacturers, retailers and recyclers. The impacts of government subsidies to consumers of remanufactured garment and manufacturers' investment in carbon emission reduction on the development of clothing industry, profits of supply chain members and the total supply chain carbon emission were analyzed and discussed. The study shows that the clothing enterprises could not sustain for a long time with the rise of carbon trading price without committing to emission reduction and without subsidies. The situation that only manufacturers invest in emission reduction is conducive to increasing the demand for traditional clothing and remanufactured clothing and the profits of supply chain members, but it also stimulates carbon emission. When emission reduction is combined with subsidy, the consumption subsidy of remanufactured clothing can improve the optimal emission reduction rate of manufacturers, enhance the competitive advantage of remanufactured garment, and can also reduce the total supply chain carbon emission. The research can provide reference for garment manufacturers' carbon emission reduction investment decision and government policy making under carbon trading.

Key words: carbon trading, government consumption subsidy, carbon reduction investment, remanufactured garment, clothing closed-loop suppy chain

中图分类号:

TS941

郑路, 张明霞, 胡觉亮, 韩曙光. 碳交易及消费补贴下的服装行业碳减排决策问题[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(01): 193-200.

ZHENG Lu, ZHANG Mingxia, HU Jueliang, HAN Shuguang. Decision of carbon emission-reduction in garment industry under carbon trading and consumption subsidy[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(01): 193-200.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 14

[1]	WANG Y, CHEN W, LIU B. Manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions for a capital-constrained manufacturer considering carbon emission cap and trade[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140:1118-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.058
[2]	XU L, XIE F, YUAN Q, et al. Pricing and carbon footprint in a two-echelon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 2019, 14(2): 212-221. doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctz013
[3]	DU S, HU L, SONG M. Production optimization considering environmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112:1600-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.086
[4]	焦建玲, 汪耘欣, 李兰兰. 基于碳配额交易的闭环供应链定价决策研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 40(6): 840-846,864.
	JIAO Jianling, WANG Yunxin, LI Lanlan. Research on pricing decision of closed-loop supply chain based on carbon quota trading[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 40(6): 840-846,864.
[5]	ZHANG L, XUE B, LIU X. Carbon emission reduction with regard to retailer's fairness concern and subsidies[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4): 1209-1237. doi: 10.3390/su10041209
[6]	YANG L, HU Y, HUANG L. Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 287(2): 480-496. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.006
[7]	WANG Z, Brownlee A E I, WU Q. Production and joint emission reduction decisions based on two-way cost-sharing contract under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 146:106549. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106549
[8]	YANG L, ZHANG Q, JI J. Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 191:286-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.021
[9]	LI J, DU W, YANG F, et al. The carbon subsidy analysis in remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain[J]. Sustainability, 2014, 6(6): 3861-3877. doi: 10.3390/su6063861
[10]	ZHAO S, ZHU Q, CUI L. A decision-making model for remanufacturers: considering both consumers' environmental preference and the government subsidy policy[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 128:176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.005
[11]	狄卫民, 徐文君, 夏西强. 基于经销商再制造的闭环供应链政府补贴策略及效果分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 102-109.
	DI Weimin, XU Wenjun, XIA Xiqiang. Government subsidy strategy and effect analysis of closed-loop supply chain based on dealer remanufacturing[J]. Operations Research and Management Research, 2021, 30(2): 102-109.
[12]	高举红, 张莹, 李梦梦. 具广告影响的再制造闭环供应链的决策与协调[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2019, 39(11): 1785-1807.
	GAO Juhong, ZHANG Ying, LI Mengmeng. Decision making and coordination of remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain influenced by advertising[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematics, 2019, 39(11): 1785-1807.
[13]	ZHAO Y, CHENG Y. Cooperation or competition? Channel choice for a remanufacturing fashion supply chain with government subsidy[J]. Sustainability, 2014, 6(10): 7292-7310. doi: 10.3390/su6107292
[14]	俞璐, 王立川, 陈雁. 服装生产过程碳排放量核算[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(4): 160-164.
	YU Lu, WANG Lichuan, CHEN Yan. Accounting of carbon emission in garment production process[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2016, 37(4): 160-164. doi: 10.1177/004051756703700302

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	蒋高明, 周濛濛, 郑宝平, 郑培晓, 刘海桑. 绿色低碳针织技术研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(01): 67-73.
[2]	侯一鸣, 鲁成. 服装企业环保主张对消费者购买意愿的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(01): 201-207.
[3]	江学为, 田润雨, 卢方骁, 张艺. 基于模拟评分的服装推荐改进算法[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 138-144.
[4]	张昭华, 陈之瑞, 李璐瑶, 肖平, 彭浩然, 张钰涵. 人体局部皮肤的气流敏感性及其影响因素[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 125-130.
[5]	刘杰, 高志. 基于柔性薄膜传感器的服装压力检测仪研制[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 159-165.
[6]	王迪, 柯莹, 王宏付. Voronoi图形在参数化服装造型构建中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 131-137.
[7]	彭稀, 屠永坚, 周赳. 纬排2比1纬二重渐变显色结构设计原理与方法[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 63-69.
[8]	徐明慧, 徐平华, 韦秋菊, 丁雪梅, 冒海琳. 基于网络关系模型的品牌女装配色解析[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(11): 137-142.
[9]	何琳, 陈李红, 丁雪梅. 基于跨理论模型的服装可持续消费行为研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(11): 143-150.
[10]	韩曙光, 颜伟雄, 胡觉亮. 模块化生产模式下的服装产品组合优化决策[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(11): 151-158.
[11]	鲁成茅佳莹沈佳逸. 服装色彩视错觉对身材感知的影响与机理[J]. , 0, (): 0-0.
[12]	谢子昂杜劲松陈清婷余雅芸荀培莉. 西服定制单元化生产的筛选秩序优化[J]. , 0, (): 0-0.
[13]	鲁成, 茅佳莹, 沈佳逸. 服装色彩视错觉对身材感知的影响与机制[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(10): 132-138.
[14]	季勇, 蒋高明. 基于学习功能的人体模型表达与实现[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(10): 146-149.
[15]	谢子昂, 杜劲松, 余雅芸, 陈清婷, 费中华. 西服定制吊挂生产线的筛选秩序优化[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(10): 150-156.