纺织学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (06): 196-203.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20251002101

• 机械与设备 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于薄膜压力传感器的浆纱机压浆区压力分布检测

王矿, 潘欣明, 郭明瑞, 王静安, 高卫东()   

  1. 江南大学 纺织科学与工程学院江苏 无锡 214122
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-14 修回日期:2026-04-19 出版日期:2026-06-15 发布日期:2026-08-19
  • 通讯作者: 高卫东(1959—),男,教授,博士。主要研究方向为纺织技术、纺织材料与纺织品。E-mail:gaowd@163.com
  • 作者简介:王矿(1995—),男,博士生。主要研究方向为先进浆纱技术。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省基础研究计划自然科学基金青年基金项目(BK20221061)

Measurement of pressure distribution in squeezing zone of sizing machine using thin-film pressure sensor

WANG Kuang, PAN Xinming, GUO Mingrui, WANG Jingan, GAO Weidong()   

  1. College of Textile Science and EngineeringJiangnan University, WuxiJiangsu 214122, China
  • Received:2025-10-14 Revised:2026-04-19 Published:2026-06-15 Online:2026-08-19

摘要:

针对压痕测试法在表征浆纱机压浆区压力分布时响应不敏感、信息维度单一等问题,构建了基于薄膜压力传感器的压力数据采集系统,并通过传感器选型、系统校准及信号处理获取压浆区压力数据。在此基础上提出了压力分布检测方法,采用一维高斯函数对压力数据进行拟合,提取最大压力和压浆时间2个压力分布指标,各工况下拟合优度R2均大于0.95,可较好地表征压浆区压力分布特征。与压痕测试法相比,所提方法能够识别压浆力变化及不同参数下压力分布的差异,实现压力分布的定量表征。结果表明:在实验范围内,最大压力和压浆时间均随压浆力的增大呈线性增长;随着包胶硬度的增加,最大压力增大而压浆时间减小;随着包胶厚度的增加,最大压力先减小后增大,压浆时间先变长后缩短。检测结果与理论分析一致,表明该方法可有效表征压浆区压力分布特征。

关键词: 浆纱机, 压力分布检测, 薄膜压力传感器, 压浆力, 压浆辊包胶参数, 压浆区

Abstract:

Objective Warp sizing is a key process for improving weaving efficiency, in which the pressure distribution in the squeezing zone plays a decisive role in size penetration and membrane formation. However, the conventional methods, such as the indentation method, can only estimate squeezing width without being able to characterize the actual pressure distribution. To address this limitation, this study proposes a pressure detection method, based on the use of a thin-film pressure sensor, to characterize the pressure distribution in the squeezing zone.

Method A pressure data acquisition system was developed, consisting of a thin-film pressure sensor, a linear voltage conversion module, an Arduino Uno R3, and a host computer data acquisition software. After sensor selection and system calibration, the sensor was mounted on the surface of the squeezing roller to measure the pressure under different levels of squeezing force and hardness and thickness of the rubber covering. The acquired signals were processed using a mean filter for noise reduction. A one-dimensional Gaussian function was then employed to fit the pressure data, from which two characteristic indicators, namely maximum pressure and squeezing time, were extracted to represent the pressure distribution.

Results The proposed method captured the pressure distribution in the squeezing zone with success under various operating conditions. The CGQ-5 thin-film pressure sensor demonstrated better stability and lower noise than the CGQ-3 sensor, as evidenced by smaller standard deviations in both analog-to-digital converter (ADC) values and voltage signals. For example, in the no-load drift test, the standard deviations of ADC and voltage for the CGQ-5 sensor were 3.69 and 18.06, respectively, compared with 4.86 and 23.74 for the CGQ-3 sensor. Similar advantages were observed in the no-load noise and constant-pressure noise tests. After calibration, the effective voltage range of 110 - 3 300 mV corresponded to a pressure range of 0.294-98.07 N, ensuring reliable voltage-to-pressure conversion. Signal processing results showed that the mean filter achieved a standard deviation of 661.07, a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.918, and a peak retention of 82.63%, indicating an optimal balance between noise reduction and dynamic response. The one-dimensional Gaussian function fitting achieved coefficients of determination (R2) higher than 0.95, demonstrating that the pressure distribution was well characterized. Compared with the indentation method, the proposed approach was capable of distinguishing subtle differences in pressure distribution. Further analysis revealed that both maximum pressure and squeezing time increased linearly with squeezing force, with average R2 values of 0.961 9 and 0.983 9, respectively. Increasing rubber covering hardness led to higher maximum pressure but reduced squeezing time, whereas increasing rubber covering thickness resulted in a nonlinear trend, with maximum pressure decreasing first and then increasing, and squeezing time showing the opposite tendency. These results are consistent with theoretical expectations, further supporting the capability of the proposed method to characterize the pressure distribution in the squeezing zone.

Conclusion A method for pressure detection in the squeezing zone of a sizing machine was developed based on the use of a thin-film pressure sensor. By integrating sensor selection, system calibration, signal processing, and one-dimensional Gaussian function fitting, the method enables accurate characterization of pressure distribution. The extracted indicators, maximum pressure and squeezing time, effectively reflect variations under different process conditions. Compared with conventional methods, the proposed method provides more comprehen

Key words: sizing machine, pressure distribution measurement, thin-film pressure sensor, squeezing force, squeezing roller rubber covering parameter, squeezing zone

中图分类号: 

  • TS103.6

图1

压力数据采集系统结构示意图"

表1

薄膜压力传感器的主要参数"

量程/N 98.07
传感器厚度/mm ≤0.1
传感器总长/mm 150
响应时间/ms <10
工作温度/℃ -30~60
工作湿度/% 0~95
使用寿命/万次 >50

图2

薄膜压力传感器的感知区"

图3

2种传感器的空载漂移、空载噪声和恒压噪声"

表2

CGQ-5和CGQ-3的空载漂移、空载噪声和恒压噪声测试结果"

项目 ADC值 电压/mV
CGQ-5 CGQ-3 CGQ-5 CGQ-3
空载漂移 20.16±3.69 18.76±4.86 97.86±18.06 90.99±23.74
空载噪声 19.09±4.02 18.86±4.94 92.76±19.68 91.63±24.14
恒压噪声 74.54±5.66 108.35±7.51 363.88±27.69 529.06±36.69

表3

不同滤波方法的平滑效果、动态响应和峰值保持性能"

方法 标准差 皮尔逊相关系数 峰值保持率/%
原始数据 678.845 1 100
均值滤波 661.069 0.918 82.63
中值滤波 670.337 0.901 84.86
高斯滤波 666.371 0.841 84.13
EMA 553.359 0.807 70.03

图4

浆纱机压浆区压力分布检测示意图"

图5

压浆辊16mm-77HA在压浆力16 kN下的压力分布曲线"

图6

压浆辊16mm-77HA在16 kN压浆力下的压力数据一维高斯函数拟合曲线"

图7

不同工况下压痕测试法测得的压痕宽度对比"

图8

压浆力对最大压力和压浆时间的影响"

图9

包胶硬度对最大压力和压浆时间的影响"

图10

包胶厚度对最大压力和压浆时间的影响"

[1] LIMENEH D Y, TESEMA A F, RAJAN K, et al. Comparing the cost-effectiveness and yarn quality improvement with PVA versus conventional maize starch as the sizing agents[J]. The Journal of Textile Institute, 2025, 116(6): 1002-1009.
[2] WANG K, GUO M R, WANG J G, et al. Effect of rubber hardness and thickness of the main squeezing roll on sized yarn performance in warp sizing: experimental and comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Natural Fibers, 2025, 22(1): 2533355.
[3] 史蜜, 王文聪, 范雪荣, 等. 聚乙烯醇聚合度和醇解度对棉浆纱性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(9): 181-187.
SHI Mi, WANG Wencong, FAN Xuerong, et al. Influence of polyvinyl alcohol polymerization and alcoholysis degrees on performance of cotton-sized yarns[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(9): 181-187.
[4] WANG K, WANG J G, GAO W D. Enhancing warp sizing effect and quality: a comprehensive review of the squeezing process and future research[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2024, 94(19/20): 2296-2315.
[5] 沈艳琴, 武海良, 钱现. 浆纱机压浆力与压榨宽度的关系[J]. 纺织导报, 2005(7): 73-75.
SHEN Yanqin, WU Hailiang, QIAN Xian. The relation between squeezing pressure and squeezing width of sizing machine[J]. China Textile Leader, 2005(7): 73-75.
[6] 韩爱国. 高压上浆下宽幅浆纱机的结构设计研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2019: 11-12.
HAN Aiguo. Research on structural design of wide width sizing machine under high pressure sizing[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2019: 11-12.
[7] 洪仲秋. 全面理解高压上浆的优越性[J]. 棉纺织技术, 2002, 30(6): 12-15.
HONG Zhongqiu. Overall understanding the superiority of high-pressure sizing[J]. Cotton Textile Technology, 2002, 30(6): 12-15.
[8] 薛振华, 董延东, 丁浩, 等. 薄膜压力传感器在铁路运输行业中的运用[J]. 科学技术创新, 2024(23): 1-4.
XUE Zhenhua, DONG Yandong, DING Hao, et al. The application of thin-film pressure sensor in the railway transportation industry[J]. Scientific and Technological Innovation Information, 2024(23): 1-4.
[9] 刘杰, 高志. 基于柔性薄膜传感器的服装压力检测仪研制[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 159-165.
LIU Jie, GAO Zhi. Development of clothing pressure detector based on flexible film sensor[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(12): 159-165.
[10] 高敏, 张一帆, 洪成雨, 等. 基于FSR压电薄膜传感器鞋垫的足底压力缓冲研究[J]. 中国皮革, 2022, 51(1): 81-85.
GAO Min, ZHANG Yifan, HONG Chengyu, et al. Foot pressure cushioning based on force sensing resistors[J]. China Leather, 2022, 51(1): 81-85.
[11] QIAN L, YU C W. Pressure distribution in the drafting zone measured by film pressure sensors[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2023, 93(7/8): 1815-1823.
[12] HERTZ H R. On the contact of elastic solids[J]. Journal Fur Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik, 1882, 92: 156-171.
[13] 沈艳琴. 新型浆纱机浆槽部分性能测试与研究[D]. 西安: 西安工程大学, 2005: 37-38.
SHEN Yanqin. Measurement and study on properties of new sizing machine's size box[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Polytechnic University, 2005: 37-38.
[14] 杨志清. 橡胶上浆辊与橡胶压浆辊的特点及其应用[J]. 现代纺织技术, 2009, 17(3): 21-24.
YANG Zhiqing. Feature and application of rubber covered sizing roller and squeezing roller[J]. Advanced Textile Technology, 2009, 17(3): 21-24.
[1] 史蜜, 王文聪, 范雪荣, 高卫东. 聚乙烯醇聚合度和醇解度对棉浆纱性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(09): 181-187.
[2] 许纶有, 邹鲲, 吴浩男. 基于机器视觉的浆纱机经轴区断纱故障检测[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(06): 231-239.
[3] 黄立新. GA306浆纱机与高压上浆工艺分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(04): 82-83.
[4] 王元昌. 分立式连续煮浆装置的设计[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(04): 104-105.
[5] 王元昌;薛 卫;梁浩祥. 浸浆的理论与实践[J]. 纺织学报, 2002, 23(02): 49-51.
[6] 王盛奎. 浆纱机的PC控制系统[J]. 纺织学报, 1998, 19(04): 46-48.
[7] 钱樨成;金卫东;黄淑韵. 浆纱机计算机监控系统的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 1998, 19(03): 55-57.
[8] 谢莉青. 开好用好双浆槽浆纱机的工作实践[J]. 纺织学报, 1998, 19(03): 27-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!