Journal of Textile Research ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (09): 57-64.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20171001908

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Fabric defect inspection based on modified discriminant complete local binary pattern and lattice segmentation

  

  • Received:2017-10-09 Revised:2018-06-20 Online:2018-09-15 Published:2018-09-12

Abstract:

The conventional cenral local binarization mode (CLBP) used in fabric defect inspection has the problems of high histogram dimension and feature redundancy, and limitation exists in conventional CLBP when the amplitude of the small part of the image varies greatly or the amplitude is flat. To solve the problems, a modified discriminant complete local binary pattern with lattice segmentation for fabric defect inspection was proposed. The proposed algorithm was divided into two a training part and testing part. The training stage was to calculate the feature value for each lattice after lattice segmentation in defect-free images and acquire the mean value of all feature values. The threshold was calculated by calculating the relative divergence between the feature value of every lattice and the mean of the feature values. The testing stage was to calculate the relative divergence and compare the result with the threshold. The lattice whose result was larger than the threshold was marked as a defect area. The proposed algorithm was compared with local binary patterns, boolean line indicator method, regular band method algorithms. Testing on fabric image datasets including 2 kinds of textures and 3 kinds of defects shows that the method has better inspection effect on star pattern and box pattern fabrics, one part of the positive rate (TPR) value can reach 0.99, and most of the inspection results of TPR are above 0.90.

Key words: central local binarization mode, lattice segmentation, feature extraction, relativedivergence, fabric defect inspection

CLC Number: 

  •  
[1] . Fast fabric defect detection algorithm based on integral image [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2016, 37(11): 141-147.
[2] . Lace retrieval method based on improved texture feature [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2016, 37(06): 142-154.
[3] . Automatic recognition and positioning method of fabric slitting zone using one-dimensional Fourier transform [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2016, 37(01): 147-151.
[4] . Algorithm for pattern detection of cotton foreign fibers based on cluster statistic analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2015, 36(03): 135-0.
[5] . Defect detection of plain weave based on visual saliency mechanism [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2014, 35(4): 56-0.
[6] . Fabric defect detection of statistic aberration feature based on GMRF model [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2013, 34(4): 137-142.
[7] . Research of mixture feature aberrance fabric defect recognition based on self-adaptive disperse wavelet transform [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2013, 34(1): 133-137.
[8] . Fabric Defect Clustering Analysis based on Artificial Neural Network [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2011, 32(9): 29-33.
[9] LIU Suyi;XIA Lei. Fabric image mosaic based on cellular automata [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2011, 32(1): 29-33.
[10] Jiang GaoPing;ZHONG Yueqi;WANG Rongwu. Identification of wool and cashmere based on characteristics of spectral line [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2010, 31(4): 15-19.
[11] LUO Yiping;WANG Yaming;ZHOU Ping;XU Jianlong. Effect of illuminating source and illumination on the signal features of fabric defects [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2007, 28(5): 66-69.
[12] LI Xiaojiu;LIU Hao. Application of KFDA in evaluation system of neckline performance [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2007, 28(3): 76-78.
[13] On-line detection of the dyed and printed fabric defects by multi-features evidence learning and enhancement in spatiotemporal domain. On-line detection of the dyed and printed fabric defects by multi-features evidence learning and enhancement in spatiotemporal domain [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2006, 27(5): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2004, 25(03): 16 -18 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 1982, 3(09): 10 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2004, 25(03): 74 -75 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 1984, 5(08): 35 -38 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 1984, 5(08): 42 -46 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 1984, 5(08): 49 -50 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 1984, 5(08): 54 -55 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 1984, 5(08): 62 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2000, 21(05): 19 -20 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 1987, 8(02): 16 -18 .