JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 121-0.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative of heat insulation performance between commonly used high-temperature and low-temperature protective clothing

  

  • Received:2012-10-18 Revised:2013-05-29 Online:2013-10-15 Published:2013-10-10

Abstract: The high-temperature and low-temperature protective clothing are used in two different environments with a larger temperature difference. This paper aims to discuss the differences and similarities of the insulation performance between commonly used high-temperature and low-temperature protective clothing. The results indicated that high-temperature and low-temperature protective clothing are both required to have good insulation performance. Sections in the chest and back, buttocks and abdomen, arms and thighs of the clothing have higher thermal resistance. Fabric and clothing insulation performance have some differences between different types of high-temperature and low-temperature protective clothing. In this paper, high-temperature protective clothing achieves the purpose of protection mainly through insulating environment heat radiation and conduction, and environmental radiant heat comes to the core of the matter. Low-temperature protective clothing, however, achieve the purpose of protection by preventing the body heat from passing to the environment. The insulation performance of the high-temperature and low-temperature protective clothing is not only primarily determined by the fabric, but also the structure design of garment.

Key words: high-temperature clothing, low-temperature protective clothing, insulation performance, thermal manikin, radiation heat, conductive heat

[1] . Preparation of skin of thermal manikin Walter with human sweating ratio [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(05): 103-107.
[2] . Influence of shape memory alloy on thermal insulation performance of flame retardant fabrics in low radiation environment [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(08): 114-119.
[3] . Application status of thermoregulatory mode in clothing comfort evaluation with thermal manikin [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(07): 164-172.
[4] . Sound insulation performance of bamboo/polyurethane composite [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(01): 73-77.
[5] .  Thermal comfort property of Baerhu Mongolian robes [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2016, 37(01): 123-126.
[6] . Development and performance evaluation of sportswear based on male body sweating pattern [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2016, 37(01): 116-122.
[7] . Thermal insulation properties of agricultural covering nonwovens [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2014, 35(5): 67-0.
[8] . Influence on asymmetrical thermal insulation of Tibetan robe on human thermal comfort [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2014, 35(4): 105-0.
[9] . Surface temperature uniformity of thermal manikin [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2012, 33(10): 113-116.
[10] CHEN Yisong;XU Jun;FAN Jintu. Sweating design in different thermal manikins and their measurement methods [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2008, 29(8): 130-134.
[11] YANG Kai;JIAO Mingli;CHEN Yisong;LI Jun;ZHANG Weiyuan. Study and application of simulated soft skin for thermal manikin [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2008, 29(12): 74-77.
[12] ZHANG Yun;WU Ziying;JI Erli;ZHOU Xiaohong;CHEN Jianyong. Measurement and comparison of the thermal transport of fabric and its garment [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2007, 28(1): 86-90.
[13] SHEN Yu-hong;JIANG Zhi-hua;ZENG Chang-song . Study and application of program-control DC power for thermal manikin [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2005, 26(1): 102-103.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!