Journal of Textile Research ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 247-254.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20250203502

• Comprehensive Review • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Current research on neural transmission and brain region response of skin wet sensation

LIU Chu1, ZHANG Xianghui1,2(), ZHANG Zhaohua1,2, NIU Wenxin3,4, WANG Shitan3,4   

  1. 1. College of Fashion and Design, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Clothing Design and Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    3. Translational Research Center, Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital ( Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai 201619, China
    4. Laboratory of Rehabilitation Engineering and Biomechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200331, China
  • Received:2025-02-20 Revised:2025-06-05 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-15
  • Contact: ZHANG Xianghui E-mail:zhangxianghui@dhu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Significance The perception of wetness is a crucial sensory experience that significantly influences human comfort and our interaction with the environment. Despite its importance, the underlying neural mechanisms of wetness perception remain not fully understood. Most existing studies focus on the peripheral neural pathways, which involve receptors and afferent neurons responsible for sensing temperature, pressure, and humidity. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for advancing fields such as sensory neuroscience, neurophysiology, and clothing design, where precise sensory feedback is critical. The value of this research lies in bridging the gap in our knowledge about how different sensory pathways collaborate to create a unified experience of wetness and how this information is integrated at the brain level. Investigating the neural circuits involved in wetness perception will offer deeper insights into sensory processing, with applications in ergonomics, healthcare, and the development of smart wearable technologies.

Progress Recent studies have increasingly emphasized the crucial role of thermoreceptors and mechanoreceptors in the perception of wetness. These peripheral sensory receptors, responsible for detecting temperature changes and tactile pressure, respectively, work in concert to transmit signals that the brain interprets as moisture on the skin. Specifically, heat-sensitive neurons respond to cooling-often associated with the evaporation of water-while mechanosensitive neurons detect the pressure and texture of stimuli contacting the skin. Research has shown that wetness perception is not mediated by a dedicated "wetness receptor" but rather emerges from the integration of cold and tactile information. This multimodal encoding occurs at the peripheral level, yet the precise mechanisms through which these different neuronal populations interact remain poorly understood.

While significant advances have been made in mapping peripheral responses to wet stimuli, notably through microneurography and psychophysical experiments, relatively less attention has been directed toward understanding how the central nervous system processes and integrates these sensory inputs. Some neuroimaging studies have proposed that the brain interprets wetness through the convergence of thermal and tactile inputs in somatosensory and higher-order integrative regions, such as the parietal and prefrontal cortices. However, empirical evidence remains scarce, and the exact neural circuits involved in wetness perception are yet to be clearly delineated. Theoretical models suggest a collaborative encoding process between thermosensitive and mechanosensitive pathways, but this hypothesis requires further validation through functional neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies. Bridging this knowledge gap is essential for advancing our understanding of multisensory integration in somatic perception and may have important implications for neurorehabilitation and tactile interface design.

Conclusion and Prospect This review highlights a growing consensus that wetness perception arises from the integration of multiple sensory pathways, primarily involving thermoreceptors and mechanoreceptors that encode temperature changes and tactile stimuli. While peripheral mechanisms of wetness perception have been relatively well characterized, significant gaps remain in our understanding of how the central nervous system processes and integrates these multisensory signals. In particular, it remains unclear how the brain transforms separate inputs, such as cooling sensations and mechanical deformation of the skin, into a unified perception of wetness. To address these knowledge gaps, future research should prioritize the use of advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and electroencephalography (EEG), to monitor cortical responses during wetness-related stimulation. These approaches can provide insights into the temporal dynamics and spatial localization of neural activity associated with wetness perception. Special attention should be given to the roles of the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, as well as the insular cortex, which are known to be involved in the integration of sensory inputs and in the perception of bodily states. Moreover, identifying the specific neural circuits and characterizing the behavior of individual neuron populations involved in wetness processing will be essential for constructing a comprehensive model of multisensory integration. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms could inform the development of innovative tactile interfaces, improve textile design for thermal and moisture comfort, and enhance user experience in wearable technology.

Key words: neurophysiology, thermal and moisture comfort, somatosensory cortical response, tactile sensation, wetness perception

CLC Number: 

  • TS941.16

Tab.1

Aβ afferent fibers and their mechanical receptors"

传入纤
维类型
感受器 响应感觉 分布位置
快适应I型 梅斯纳
小体
感知轻触和低频振动,能够快速对机械刺激做出反应,但当刺激持续时会迅速适应,停止发送信号 皮肤的表皮和真皮交界处
快适应II型 帕奇尼
小体
感知高频振动,传递速度更快,能检测深部的机械变化和压力变化 皮下组织、关节周围、肌腱和骨膜中
慢适应I型 梅克尔
细胞盘
感知持续的压力和形变,特别是对皮肤表面的精细触觉具有高敏感性 表皮层的基底部
慢适应II型 鲁菲尼
末梢
感知皮肤的深层变形,对皮肤的拉伸和剪切力具有高敏感性 皮肤的真皮深层和皮下组织中
[1] VALENZA A, BIANCO A, FILINGERI D. Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running[J]. The Journal of Physiology, 2019, 597(13): 3315-3332.
doi: 10.1113/JP277928 pmid: 31093981
[2] 何满堂, 郭俊泽, 王黎明, 等. 纳米纤维包芯纱截面方向热湿耦合传递过程的模拟[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(8): 142-149.
HE Mantang, GUO Junze, WANG Liming, et al. Simulation of coupled thermal-moisture transfer in cross-section of nanofiber core-spun yarns[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(8): 142-149.
[3] 李美泽, 方青青, 齐业雄. 芳纶、海藻纤维复合高隔热针织面料开发[J]. 针织工业, 2024(8): 18-21.
LI Meize, FANG Qingqing, QI Yexiong. Development of aramid and seaweed fiber knitted composite fabric with high thermal insulation performance[J]. Knitting Industries, 2024(8): 18-21.
[4] 昌康琪, 罗梦颖, 赵青华, 等. 辐射降温聚烯烃纳米纤维膜的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(7): 24-30.
CHANG Kangqi, LUO Mengying, ZHAO Qinghua, et al. Preparation and properties of radiation cooling polyolefin nanofiber membrane[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(7): 24-30.
[5] ZU Y, HU J, YANG M, et al. Electrochemical power generation humidity sensor based on WS2 nano-flakes[J]. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2024.DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2024.135325.
[6] BUOITE STELLA A, FILINGERI D, GARASCIA G, et al. Skin wetness sensitivity across body sites commonly affected by pain in people with migraine[J]. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 2022, 62(6): 737-747.
doi: 10.1111/head.v62.6
[7] EYAREFE O D, OLOGUNAGBA F M, EMIKPE B O. Wound healing potential of natural honey in diabetic and non-diabetic wistar rats[J]. African Journal of Biomedical Research, 2014, 17(1): 15-21.
[8] ÖĞÜLMÜŞ DEMIRCAN F, YÜCEDAĞ İ, TOZ M. A novel mathematical model including the wetness parameter as a variable for prevention of pressure ulcers[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2022, 236(3): 427-437.
doi: 10.1177/09544119211048557
[9] SHIBAHARA M, SATO K. Illusion of wetness by dynamic touch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2019, 12(4): 533-541.
doi: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2919575 pmid: 31150346
[10] PLOUMITSAKOU M, MUHEIM J, FELOUZIS A, et al. Remapping wetness perception in upper limb amputees[J]. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/aisy.202300512.
[11] FILINGERI D, FOURNET D, HODDER S, et al. Why wet feels wet? a neurophysiological model of human cutaneous wetness sensitivity[J]. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2014, 112(6): 1457-1469.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00120.2014 pmid: 24944222
[12] 唐香宁, 张昭华, 李俊, 等. 人体皮肤湿感觉的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(9): 174-180.
TANG Xiangning, ZHANG Zhaohua, LI Jun, et al. Research progress of human skin wetness perception[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017, 38(9): 174-180.
[13] BERGMANN TIEST W M, KOSTERS N D, KAPPERS A M L, et al. Haptic perception of wetness[J]. Acta Psychologica, 2012, 141(2): 159-163.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.014 pmid: 22964056
[14] FILINGERI D, REDORTIER B, HODDER S, et al. Warm temperature stimulus suppresses the perception of skin wetness during initial contact with a wet surface[J]. Skin Research and Technology, 2015, 21(1): 9-14.
doi: 10.1111/srt.12148 pmid: 24612108
[15] ZHANG Z, SUN C, ZHANG X. The effect of the heat transfer mechanism on the psychophysical assessment of moisture sensation in fabrics[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2022, 92(19/20): 3629-3640.
doi: 10.1177/00405175221080095
[16] KATO I, MASUDA Y, NAGASHIMA K. Characteristics of wet perception during the static touch of moist paper by the index fingertip alongside thermal stimulus application[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.114033.
[17] ANDRÉ T. Fingertip skin as an optimal interface to manipulate objects: the role of moisture[D]. Louvain-la-Neuve: UCL-UniversitÉ Catholique de Louvain, 2010: 42-44.
[18] RACCUGLIA M, HODDER S, HAVENITH G. Human wetness perception in relation to textile water absorption parameters under static skin contact[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2017, 87(20): 2449-2463.
doi: 10.1177/0040517516671127
[19] JIANG R, WANG Y. Study of the Human stickiness perception of wet fabric on the volar forearm via two contact modes: friction and adhesion-separation[J]. Perception, 2020, 49(12): 1311-1332.
doi: 10.1177/0301006620976992 pmid: 33302776
[20] FILINGERI D, FOURNET D, HODDER S, et al. Tactile cues significantly modulate the perception of sweat-induced skin wetness independently of the level of physical skin wetness[J]. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2015, 113(10): 3462-3473.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00141.2015 pmid: 25878153
[21] ZHANG Z, TANG X, WANG Y, et al. Effect of fiber type, water content, and velocity on wetness perception by the volar forearm test: threshold detection test[J]. Perception, 2020, 49(2): 139-154.
doi: 10.1177/0301006619899803 pmid: 32050861
[22] ZHANG Z, TANG X, LI J, et al. The effect of dynamic friction with wet fabrics on skin wetness perception[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2020, 26(2): 370-383.
doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1453023 pmid: 29537944
[23] LITHFOUS S, TROCMET L, PEBAYLE T, et al. Investigating cold Aδ fibers in the 0-40 ℃ temperature range: a quantitative sensory testing and evoked potentials study[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022, 134: 81-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.11.076
[24] LIAO X. Neuropsychological mechanisms of fabric touch sensations[D]. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2015: 294-296.
[25] ACKERLEY R, OLAUSSON H, WESSBERG J, et al. Wetness perception across body sites[J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2012, 522(1): 73-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.06.020 pmid: 22710006
[26] DESPRÉS O, MAMINO E, PEBAYLE T, et al. An electronical stimulator for quantitative sensory testing and evoked potential analysis of tactile Aβ nerve fibers[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023, 150: 184-193.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.03.014 pmid: 37075683
[27] ABAGNALE S, PANICO F, SAGLIANO L, et al. Pleasant touch: behavioural and hemodynamic responses to a protocol for systematic assessment of tactile stimulation[J]. Cortex, 2025, 184: 236-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.01.003 pmid: 39908706
[28] ETZI R, SPENCE C, GALLACE A. Textures that we like to touch: an experimental study of aesthetic preferences for tactile stimuli[J]. Consciousness and Cognition, 2014, 29: 178-188.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.011 pmid: 25286127
[29] MARSHALL A, ACKERLEY R. P990: uncovering the tactile aspects in sensing drops of water[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(14)51026-7.
[30] LI S, LI B, GAO L, et al. Humidity response in Drosophila olfactory sensory neurons requires the mechanosensitive channel TMEM63[J]. Nature Communications, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31253-z
[31] RUSSELL J, VIDAL-GADEA A G, MAKAY A, et al. Humidity sensation requires both mechanosensory and thermosensory pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111(22): 8269-8274.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322512111
[32] GEISLER W S, KERSTEN D. Illusions, perception and Bayes[J]. Nature Neuroscience, 2002, 5(6): 508-510.
pmid: 12037517
[33] OTTEN M, SETH A K, PINTO Y. A social Bayesian brain: how social knowledge can shape visual perception[J]. Brain and Cognition, 2017, 112: 69-77.
doi: S0278-2626(16)30059-8 pmid: 27221986
[34] HAGGARD P, IANNETTI G D, LONGO M R. Spatial sensory organization and body representation in pain perception[J]. Current Biology, 2013, 23(4): 164-176.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.047 pmid: 23428330
[35] KING M, CARNAHAN H. Revisiting the brain activity associated with innocuous and noxious cold expo-sure[J]. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019, 104: 197-208.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.021
[36] GARKAVENKO V V, MAN'KOVSKAYA O P, OMEL'CHENKO T G, et al. Effect of cold stimulation of the arm fingers on the spectral/coherent EEG characteristics in humans[J]. Neurophysiology, 2008, 40(3): 228-230.
doi: 10.1007/s11062-008-9041-4
[37] SHAROONI P M, MAEREFAT M, ZOLFAGHARI S A, et al. A feasibility study on using fNIRS brain signals to recognize personal thermal sensation and thermal comfort conditions[J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2024, 34(6): 952-961.
[38] MERRICK C. The influence of thermal, tactile and visual modalities on human skin wetness perception[D]. Loughborough: Loughborough University, 2021: 116-120.
[39] YUAN J, YU W, CHEN K, et al. A potential new fabric evaluation approach by capturing brain perception under fabric contact pressure[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2019, 89(16): 3312-3325.
doi: 10.1177/0040517518811939
[40] TANG W, ZHANG S, YU C, et al. Tactile perception of textile fabrics based on friction and brain activa-tion[J]. Friction, 2023, 11(7): 1320-1333.
doi: 10.1007/s40544-022-0679-5
[41] TALEEI T, NAZEM-ZADEH M R, AMIRI M, et al. EEG-based functional connectivity for tactile roughness discrimination[J]. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2023, 17(4): 921-940.
doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09876-1 pmid: 37522039
[1] GE Meitong, DONG Zhijia, CONG Honglian, DING Yuqin. Structure and moisture/thermal management evaluation of concave-convex lattice knitted fabrics [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(07): 47-54.
[2] TAN Yidan, ZHANG Zhaohua, LI Shihan. Effect of different sensory modalities on wetness perception of fabrics [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(06): 82-88.
[3] YAO Chenxi, WAN Ailan. Thermal and moisture comfort of polybutylene terephthalate/polyethylene terephthalate weft-knitted sports T-shirt fabrics [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(01): 90-98.
[4] WANG Yutao, CONG Honglian, GU Hongyang. Structural design and thermal-moist comfort of weft knitted knee pads [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(10): 68-74.
[5] QIAN Juan, XIE Ting, ZHANG Peihua, FU Shaoju. Thermal and moisture comfort performance of polyethylene knitted fabric [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(07): 60-66.
[6] ZHANG Zhaohua, TANG Xiangning, LI Jun, LI Luyao. Threshold and intensity evaluation of skin wetness perception under dynamic contact with fabrics [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(02): 93-100.
[7] KONG Lingjian;YAN Xiong. Application of gray system theory in evaluation of thermal and moisture comfort of bast fiber fabrics [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2007, 28(4): 41-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!