Journal of Textile Research ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (04): 215-224.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20250603501

• Apparel Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Multi-view 3-D human body reconstruction

LI Yutong1, YU Shijia2, HAN Shuguang3()   

  1. 1 School of Fashion Design & Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
    2 Entrepreneurship Institute, Zhejiang Polytechnic University of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310053, China
    3 School of Science, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
  • Received:2025-06-17 Revised:2026-02-07 Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-04-15
  • Contact: HAN Shuguang E-mail:dawn1024@zstu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Objective In virtual try-on and garment customization, the traditional 3-D human reconstruction method faces limitations, where the single-view methods yield inaccuracies due to depth ambiguity/occlusion while multi-view approaches ignore topological correlations. This study aims to overcome these by innovatively integrating CNNs and GCNs to develop an accurate video-frame-to-3-D-body mapping, and to establish a framework capable of solving nonlinear multi-view feature aggregation which enables efficient reconstruction using consumer-grade video inputs instead of professional scanners.

Method This study proposes a novel 3-D human body reconstruction framework that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCN). To address the challenge of sparse view reconstruction, multi-view binary masks are extracted from a 360° rotating video and the 3-D human shape is compressed into a 25-dimensional PCA parameter space. The core architecture employs a modified ResNet-50 embedded with 3-D convolutional layers and Convolutional Block Attention Modules (CBAM) to capture spatiotemporal features and enhance structural discriminability. Furthermore, a two-layer GCN is utilized to model the spatial correlations between different viewpoints via an adjacency matrix. By modeling the multi-view inputs as nodes in a graph structure, the GCN dynamically aggregates spatial context, enabling the network to learn the geometric relationship between viewpoints and resolve occlusion ambiguities inherent in individual projections. This integration enables precise regression of PCA coefficients for high-fidelity mesh generation. Experimental results on the SPRING dataset demonstrate that the proposed method effectively recovers complex body geometries with high computational efficiency and robustness.

Results The proposed method leads to significant improvements in both accuracy and efficiency for 3-D human body reconstruction. The proposed method achieves a Chamfer Distance (CD) of 1.12 cm, outperforming existing methods. Furthermore, the reconstruction precision is demonstrated by an average per-vertex error of less than 0.5 cm, with relative errors for all primary human body parameters maintained below 5%, confirming the high geometric fidelity of the reconstructed model. The ablation study confirmed the critical contribution of the GCN module: the exclusion of this component resulted in a significant increase in both the average per-vertex error and the maximum error, demonstrating the module's effectiveness in capturing complex inter-view relationships. Visual comparisons between reconstructed models and ground-truth meshes validated the method's capability for recovering fine-grained anatomical details. Practical utility was demonstrated in apparel customization scenarios, where virtual try-on applications leveraging the precise body models significantly reduced costs associated with physical garment trials. Although the GCN component introduced additional computational overhead during training, the achieved reconstruction quality substantially surpassed traditional CNN cascade strategies.

Conclusion This study proposes an innovative CNN-GCN fusion framework that effectively addresses the core challenge of insufficient view-correlation modeling in multi-view human body reconstruction. By integrating locally extracted CNN features with topological relationships among views captured by the GCN, the approach significantly enhances reconstruction accuracy. The method provides an efficient solution for virtual try-on and personalized garment customization scenarios, achieving high-precision modeling using only video captured by ordinary cameras, thereby substantially reducing the cost barrier associated with traditional 3-D scanning equipment. However, training efficiency requires further optimization due to computational overhead from sparse matrix operations in the GCN. Future work will focus on developing lightweight graph network architectures to accelerate inference while extending the framework to dynamic reconstruction applications.

Key words: 3-D human reconstruction, parametric human model, graph neural network, attention mechanism

CLC Number: 

  • TP391.41

Fig.1

Elbow law diagram"

Fig.2

Interframe cosine similarity heatmap"

Fig.3

Extracted keyframes. (a) Front; (b) Back; (c) Left side; (d) Right side; (e) Left front side; (f) Left back side; (g) Right front side; (h) Right back side"

Fig.4

ResNet-50 residual block with CBAM"

Fig.5

Graph convolutional layer"

Fig.6

ResNetGCN network model"

Tab.1

Model performance evaluation"

人体部位 均方根误差/cm 平均绝对误差/cm 相关系数
颈围 0.14 0.15 0.88
肩宽 0.08 0.07 0.79
胸围 0.12 0.14 0.91
腰围 0.08 0.07 0.93
臀围 0.09 0.08 0.87
大腿围 0.15 0.14 0.85
小腿围 0.33 0.35 0.83

Fig.7

Error heat map"

Tab.2

Body reconstruction circumference error"

人体部位 女性误差/cm 男性误差/cm
颈围 1.03 1.08
肩宽 0.44 0.43
胸围 0.78 0.83
腰围 0.82 0.77
臀围 0.91 0.88
大腿围 0.86 0.89
小腿围 1.15 1.17

Tab.3

Comparison of different methods"

方法 倒角距离/cm
Dibra等[7] 3.12
Liu等[9] 1.65
PIFu[20] 2.54
ECON[10] 1.98
MultiGO[11] 1.53
ResNetGCN 1.12

Fig.8

Real body and reconstructed body front and side images. (a) Subject 1; (b) Subject 2; (c) Subject 3; (d) Subject 4"

Tab.4

Reconstruction circumference error on real body"

人体部位 误差/cm
受试者1 受试者2 受试者3 受试者4
颈围 1.83 1.46 1.98 1.72
肩宽 0.98 1.03 1.12 1.09
胸围 1.43 1.58 1.49 1.93
腰围 1.52 1.65 1.25 1.87
臀围 1.41 1.37 1.44 1.75
大腿围 1.35 1.40 1.69 1.95
小腿围 1.87 1.77 1.86 1.92

Fig.9

Point-by-point error distribution. (a) Maximum error distribution; (b) Average error distribution"

Fig.10

Point-by-point error accumulation distribution function. (a) Maximum error accumulation distribution function; (b) Average error accumulation distribution function"

[1] 程碧莲, 蒋高明, 李炳贤. 三维服装虚拟展示技术的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(5): 248-257.
CHENG Bilian, JIANG Gaoming, LI Bingxian. Research progress in three-dimensional garment virtual display technology[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(5): 248-257.
[2] ZENG Y H, FU J L, CHAO H Y. 3D human body reshaping withAnthropometric modeling[C]// Internet Multimedia Computing and Service. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 96-107.
[3] ZHAO T H, LI S N, NGAN K N, et al. 3-D reconstruction of human body shape from a single commodity depth camera[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019, 21(1): 114-123.
doi: 10.1109/TMM.2018.2844087
[4] 季勇, 蒋高明. 基于学习功能的人体模型表达与实现[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(10): 146-149, 156.
doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20200802605
JI Yong, JIANG Gaoming. Expression and realization of human body model based on learning model[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(10): 146-149, 156.
doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20200802605
[5] VAROL G, CEYLAN D, RUSSELL B, et al. BodyNet: volumetric inference of 3D human body shapes[C]//Computer Vision - ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer, 2018: 20-38.
[6] BOGO F, KANAZAWA A, LASSNER C, et al. Keep it SMPL: automatic estimation of 3D human pose and shape from a single image[C]//Computer Vision - ECCV 2016. Cham: Springer, 2016: 561-578.
[7] DIBRA E, JAIN H, ÖZTIRELI C, et al. HS-nets:estimating human body shape from silhouettes with convolutional neural networks[C]//2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). New York: IEEE, 2016: 108-117.
[8] 王婷, 顾冰菲. 基于图像的人体颈肩部三维模型构建[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(1): 125-132.
WANG Ting, GU Bingfei. 3-D modeling of neck-shoulder part based on human photos[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(1): 125-132.
doi: 10.1177/004051757204200210
[9] LIU B, LIU X P, YANG Z X, et al. Concise and effective network for 3D human modeling from orthogonal silhouettes[EB/OL]. 2019: arXiv: 1912.11616. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11616.
[10] XIU Y L, YANG J L, CAO X, et al. ECON:explicit Clothed humans Optimized via Normal integra-tion[C]//2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2023: 512-523.
[11] ZHANG G J, YAO N J, ZHANG S S, et al.MultiGO:towards multi-level geometry learning for monocular 3D textured human reconstruction[C]//2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2025: 338-347.
[12] SU H, MAJI S, KALOGERAKIS E, et al.Multi-view convolutional neural networks for 3-D shape recognition[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). New York: IEEE, 2016: 945-953.
[13] CHEN X Z, MA H M, WAN J, et al.Multi-view 3D object detection network for autonomous driving[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2017: 6526-6534.
[14] WEI X, YU R X, SUN J.View-GCN:view-based graph convolutional network for 3D shape analy-sis[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2020: 1847-1856.
[15] ALLEN B, CURLESS B, POPOVIĆ Z. The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2003, 22(3): 587-594.
[16] ANGUELOV D, SRINIVASAN P, KOLLER D, et al. SCAPE: shape completion and animation of peo-ple[M]// Seminal graphics papers:pushing the boundaries, volume 2. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2023: 819-827.
[17] LOPER M, MAHMOOD N, ROMERO J, et al. SMPL: a skinned multi-person linear model[M]// Seminal graphics papers:pushing the boundaries, volume 2. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2023: 851-866.
[18] YANG Y P, YU Y, ZHOU Y, et al. Semantic parametric reshaping of human body models[C]// 2014 2nd International Conference on 3D Vision. New York: IEEE, 2015: 41-48.
[19] WOO S, PARK J, LEE J Y, et al. CBAM: convolutional block attention module[C]//Computer Vision - ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer, 2018: 3-19.
[20] SAITO S, HUANG Z, NATSUME R, et al. PIFu:pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digitization[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). New York: IEEE, 2020: 2304-2314.
[21] ALLDIECK T, MAGNOR M, XU W P, et al. Video based reconstruction of 3D people models[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE, 2018: 8387-8397.
[1] DU Xiaoguang, JING Junfeng, WANG Yongbo. Research on lightweight lace fabric surface defect detection method based on improved YOLOv9s [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2026, 47(04): 145-153.
[2] LÜ Zebin, LI Ziyin, WANG Xiaodong, YE Fei, LIU Weihong. Classification of down images based on tri-stage residual dynamic focusing network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2026, 47(02): 73-83.
[3] FENG Zhengrong, LIU Beifen, CHEN Mengyuan. Style transfer model for floral printed patterns based on multi-scale feature fusion [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2026, 47(02): 264-272.
[4] ZHANG Xiaoting, ZHAO Pengyu, PAN Ruru, GAO Weidong. Plaid fabric image retrieval method based on deep feature fusion [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(08): 89-95.
[5] LUO Ruiqi, CHANG Dashun, HU Xinrong, LIANG Jinxing, PENG Tao, CHEN Jia, LI Li. Cross-pose virtual try-on based on improved appearance flow network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(06): 203-211.
[6] LU Yinwen, HOU Jue, YANG Yang, GU Bingfei, ZHANG Hongwei, LIU Zheng. Single dress image video synthesis based on pose embedding and multi-scale attention [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(07): 165-172.
[7] HU Xudong, TANG Wei, ZENG Zhifa, RU Xin, PENG Laihu, LI Jianqiang, WANG Boping. Structure classification of weft-knitted fabric based on lightweight convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(05): 60-69.
[8] GU Meihua, HUA Wei, DONG Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Xiaodan. Occlusive clothing image segmentation based on context extraction and attention fusion [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(05): 155-164.
[9] SHI Hongyu, WEI Yingjie, GUAN Shengqi, LI Yi. Cotton foreign fibers detection algorithm based on residual structure [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(12): 35-42.
[10] MA Chuangjia, QI Lizhe, GAO Xiaofei, WANG Ziheng, SUN Yunquan. Stitch quality detection method based on improved YOLOv4-Tiny [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(08): 181-188.
[11] YUAN Tiantian, WANG Xin, LUO Weihao, MEI Chennan, WEI Jingyan, ZHONG Yueqi. Three-dimensional virtual try-on network based on attention mechanism and vision transformer [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(07): 192-198.
[12] FU Han, HU Feng, GONG Jie, YU Lianqing. Defect reconstruction algorithm for fabric defect detection [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(07): 103-109.
[13] CHEN Jia, YANG Congcong, LIU Junping, HE Ruhan, LIANG Jinxing. Cross-domain generation for transferring hand-drawn sketches to garment images [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(01): 171-178.
[14] GU Meihua, LIU Jie, LI Liyao, CUI Lin. Clothing image segmentation method based on feature learning and attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(11): 163-171.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!