纺织学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (06): 64-68.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20160601505

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

苎麻脱胶果胶复合酶的优选及其效果分析

  

  • 收稿日期:2016-06-08 修回日期:2017-03-20 出版日期:2017-06-15 发布日期:2017-06-16

Screening on compound pectinase for ramie degumming and its effect analysis

  • Received:2016-06-08 Revised:2017-03-20 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2017-06-16

摘要:

为研发高效苎麻脱胶酶制剂,对筛选并保藏的苎麻脱胶高效菌种进行液态发酵,测定胞外酶的果胶酶活力、甘露聚糖酶活力和蛋白质含量等特征参数。通过苎麻酶法脱胶,从纤维表观形态学、质量损失率、残胶率等方面综合分析苎麻脱胶效果。结果表明:第N 组和第G 组的果胶酶活力较优,分别为61.79、13.69IU/mL,比酶活力分别为4.47、0.93IU/mg;第N组和第G组的纤维素酶活力仅为0.01、0.02IU/mL;第N组和第G组苎麻质量损失率分别为20.30%和18.69%,残胶率分别为2.52%和4.21%,均接近实际工业化应用水平;第N组的单纤维线密为5.31dtex,束纤维断裂强度为4.8cN/dtex,属于优质脱胶苎麻纤维。

关键词: 苎麻, 脱胶, 果胶酶, 半纤维素, 纤维形态

Abstract:

To develop efficient enzyme preparation used in ramie degumming, the efficient strains used in ramie bio-degumming subjected to lipuid state fermentation, which were screened and accessed. The characteristic parameters of extracellular enzymes including pectinase activity, mannanase activity and protein content, etc. were further determined, and the comprehensive indexes of the ramie degumming system, such as fiber morphology, mass loss rate, residual gum rate, etc. , were analyzed. The results show that pectinase activities of the group N and the group G were 61.79 IU/mL and 13.69 IU/mL, respectively, and their special enzyme activities were 4.47 IU/mg and 0.93 IU/mg, respectively.Gellulase activities of the group  N and the group G were only 0.01IU/mL and 0.02IU/mL, respectively. Their mass loss rate and residual gum rate of the group N and the group G were 20.30% and 18.69%, and 2.52% and 4.21%, respectively, which are close to those of strains in practical industry application. The single fiber fineness of the group Nwas 5.31dtex, and the fracture strength of the bundle fiber was 4.8 cN/dtex,  which belonged to high-quality degummed ramie fiber.

Key words: ramie, degumming, hemi-cellulose, fiber morphology

[1] 王宗乾 杨海伟 王邓峰. 脱胶对蚕丝纤维的溶解及丝素蛋白性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(04): 69-76.
[2] 石大为 王瑞 陈旭 吴炳洋. 基于射频处理的胡麻生物脱胶工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(03): 73-78.
[3] 孟超然 毕雪蓉 李佳蔚 郁崇文. 丹蒽醌对氧化脱胶苎麻纤维理化性能的调控[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(02): 78-85.
[4] 冯雅妮 张梅 罗胜利 白玉颖 司马义· 艾沙江 邱夷平 蒋秋冉. 光催化除甲醛苎麻织物的低温复合制备[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(12): 106-111.
[5] 巩继贤 张秋亚 张涛 李政 张健飞. 韧皮结构对罗布麻生物脱胶的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(12): 83-87.
[6] 吴惠英. 脱胶工艺对蚕丝溶解及再生丝素蛋白纤维性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(08): 75-80.
[7] 王迎 雷红娜 解梓畅 季英超. 等离子体氧化在大麻纤维脱胶中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(07): 75-79.
[8] 黄益 王权威 孟一丁 聂春玲 周岚 邵建中. 苎麻织物的柠檬酸/多元醇抗皱整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(05): 104-109.
[9] 郭营 丁若垚 郁崇文. 亚麻原麻及其粗纱生物酶处理工艺条件的优化[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(4): 70-0.
[10] 于红梅 郁崇文. 采用现代工艺的传统风格夏布开发[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(05): 37-0.
[11] 田英华 刘晓兰 郑喜群 王路. 酸性溶液预浸对酶法亚麻脱胶及纤维性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(05): 75-0.
[12] 蒋亚君 邱莹丹 王霁龙 章倩 邱夷平. 应用1-辛烯涂层与常压等离子体处理的苎麻纤维疏水性能改性[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(06): 7-0.
[13] 李甜甜 黄江峰 邵建中. 苎麻织物的纤维素酶与聚氨酯联合抗刺痒整理技术[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(03): 76-0.
[14] 陈志军 刘兴乔 柳浩 罗云英 黄年华. 苎麻织物紫外光接枝阻燃改性研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(4): 79-0.
[15] 赵敏 赵睿昕 沈永明 彭定元. CFR嵌片对超高分子质量聚乙烯多层复合织物防爆性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(3): 37-0.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!