纺织学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (04): 72-77.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20190505406

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

用分光光度计法测量纤维颜色的影响因素

张戈1,2, 周建1,2, 王蕾1,2, 潘如如1,2, 高卫东1,2()   

  1. 1.生态纺织教育部重点实验室(江南大学), 江苏 无锡 214122
    2.江南大学 纺织科学与工程学院, 江苏 无锡 214122
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-22 修回日期:2019-11-20 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2020-04-27
  • 通讯作者: 高卫东
  • 作者简介:张戈(1988—),女,博士生。主要研究方向为数字化纺织技术。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(61802152);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0309200);江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(KYCX17_1451);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20180602)

Influencing factors for fiber color measurement by spectrophotometer

ZHANG Ge1,2, ZHOU Jian1,2, WANG Lei1,2, PAN Ruru1,2, GAO Weidong1,2()   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Eco-Textiles (Jiangnan University), Ministry of Education, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
    2. School of Textiles and Clothing, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
  • Received:2019-05-22 Revised:2019-11-20 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-27
  • Contact: GAO Weidong

摘要:

针对有色纤维颜色测量结果不准确、不稳定的问题,研究了在应用分光光度计测量纤维颜色时,纤维样品制备过程中不同因素对测量结果的影响,并尝试为后期的纤维混色研究提供一种标准的颜色测量方法。选取品红、蓝、黄3种颜色的棉纤维为实验原料,分析了纤维厚度、密度对其颜色测量结果的影响;并对比了纤维纵向、横向和任意排列时,颜色测量结果的差异。结果表明:颜色测量时纤维任意排列,样品厚度大于0.8 cm时,厚度变化对颜色测量结果的影响色差小于0.1;当纤维质量不低于10 g时,密度变化对颜色测量结果的影响色差小于0.2。

关键词: 有色纤维, 棉纤维, 分光光度计法, 颜色测量, 色差

Abstract:

In view of the lack of precision in directly measuring the color of colored fibers, the influence of different factors on the measurement results of the fiber sample preparation process was studied. An attempt was made to provide a standard color measurement method for fiber blending. The cotton fibers magenta, blue and yellow were selected and used as the experimental materials. The color parameters of the fibers changed with the variation of fiber thickness. The density of the fibers was related to the porosity and had an influence on the color measurement results. The fibers were arranged differently (vertical, horizontal, arbitrary) and the color measurement results were compared. The fibers are randomly arranged during the color measurement process, when the sample thickness increased to 0.8 cm or above, the color difference is less than 0.1 for the changes of thickness. The weight of the fibers in the self-made container is 10 g or heavier, the color difference is less than 0.2 for the changes of density.

Key words: colored fiber, cotton fiber, spectrophotometer method, color measurement, color difference

中图分类号: 

  • TS193.1

图1

三色染色棉纤维"

图2

自制纤维测色容器"

图3

纤维施加作用力装置图"

图4

3种纤维排列方式"

表1

不同厚度时三色棉纤维颜色参数"

纤维厚度/
cm
M B Y
L* a* b* L* a* b* L* a* b*
0.2 44.23 52.31 -4.82 56.62 -11.14 -31.05 77.34 14.80 60.04
0.4 44.45 52.14 -4.94 56.88 -11.10 -30.90 77.42 14.46 58.51
0.6 44.46 52.11 -4.94 56.85 -11.10 -30.90 77.50 14.61 58.45
0.8 44.47 52.09 -4.99 56.88 -11.10 -30.91 77.55 14.61 58.42
1.0 44.51 51.97 -4.99 56.87 -11.08 -30.91 77.55 14.60 58.38
1.2 44.56 51.91 -5.02 56.95 -11.09 -30.87 77.57 14.58 58.34

图5

厚度改变前后三色棉纤维色差结果"

表2

不同密度时三色棉纤维的颜色参数"

纤维质
量/g
M B Y
L* a* b* L* a* b* L* a* b*
3 43.15 52.99 -4.25 55.44 -11.37 -31.52 75.80 15.39 61.61
4 43.46 52.94 -4.31 55.56 -11.34 -31.56 75.98 15.21 61.05
5 43.54 52.96 -4.35 55.46 -11.31 -31.49 75.91 16.20 61.33
6 43.67 53.03 -4.39 55.90 -11.31 -31.22 75.71 15.96 60.76
7 43.73 53.11 -4.42 55.85 -11.31 -31.49 76.54 16.19 61.40
8 43.81 52.97 -4.62 56.00 -11.33 -31.43 76.38 16.75 61.12
9 43.92 52.90 -4.59 55.94 -11.11 -31.15 76.18 16.91 61.33
10 43.93 52.90 -4.56 56.41 -11.35 -31.16 76.33 16.17 60.86
11 44.05 52.85 -4.71 56.46 -11.34 -31.15 76.35 16.22 60.86
12 44.18 52.74 -4.76 56.59 -11.35 -31.08 76.40 16.20 60.65
13 44.31 52.54 -4.85 56.61 -11.29 -31.07 76.46 16.14 60.39

图6

不同密度时三色棉纤维色差结果"

表3

3种排列方式时三色棉纤维的颜色参数"

排列方式 M B Y
L* a* b* L* a* b* L* a* b*
纵向平行 44.77 52.33 -5.24 57.61 -11.45 -30.90 76.72 16.08 60.48
横向平行 44.76 52.44 -5.16 57.49 -11.45 -30.99 76.74 16.11 60.54
任意排列 43.84 52.47 -4.77 55.97 -11.26 -31.50 76.89 14.85 60.95

表4

不同纤维排列方式之间的色差值"

纤维颜色 纵向-横向排列 纵向-任意排列 横向-任意排列
M 0.05 0.49 0.47
B 0.06 0.80 0.74
Y 0.02 0.85 0.86

表5

3种方法的色差值比较"

染料用量/
%(o.w.f)
M B Y
DE00-1 DE00-2 DE00-3 DE00-1 DE00-2 DE00-3 DE00-1 DE00-2 DE00-3
0.05 0.35 1.32 0.97 0.52 1.39 0.74 0.45 0.99 0.95
0.10 0.60 1.24 0.85 0.76 1.26 0.79 0.92 1.10 0.81
0.20 0.80 1.27 0.82 1.22 1.36 0.76 1.04 1.12 0.84
0.30 1.19 1.12 0.88 1.44 1.48 0.63 1.20 1.04 0.89
0.45 1.31 1.34 0.81 1.96 1.60 0.89 1.71 1.12 0.84
1.00 2.14 1.36 1.02 3.18 1.68 1.40 2.35 1.27 0.97
1.60 4.19 1.48 1.85 6.19 1.24 2.88 3.89 1.58 1.59
2.00 5.30 1.37 2.82 6.68 1.32 3.11 4.11 1.73 1.72
2.50 4.98 1.17 2.25 7.35 1.25 3.57 4.48 1.81 1.95
4.00 6.02 1.27 2.84 8.04 1.51 4.11 4.87 1.78 2.11
5.00 6.51 1.69 3.14 8.01 1.66 4.06 5.30 2.03 2.44
8.00 7.17 1.59 3.56 7.94 1.79 4.26 5.74 2.19 2.73
平均值 3.38 1.35 1.82 4.44 1.46 2.27 3.01 1.48 1.49
最小值 0.35 1.12 0.81 0.52 1.24 0.63 0.45 0.99 0.81
最大值 7.17 1.69 3.56 8.04 1.79 4.26 5.74 2.19 2.73
方差 6.57 0.03 1.11 10.05 0.04 2.32 3.68 0.18 0.48
[1] 王泉, 姚佳, 李艳清, 等. Stearns-Noechel 模型在天然彩色棉混色中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2016,37(1):93-97.
WANG Quan, YAO Jia, LI Yanqing, et al. Application of Stearns-Noechel model on color blending of naturally colored cotton[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2016,37(1):93-97.
[2] DUNTLEY S Q. The prediction and control of colored fiber blends by optical mixing[J]. American Dyestuff Reporter, 1941,30:689-700.
[3] DAVIDSON H R, TAYLOR M. Prediction of the color of fiber blends[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1965,55(1):96-100.
[4] RICHARD Hunter, RICHARD Harold. The measurement of appearance[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987: 78.
[5] CHE Jiangning, CHEN Donghui. A correction algorithm for reflectance measured with optical glass[J]. Coloration Technology, 2002,118(2):49-51.
[6] 孟庆涛, 解新生, 郭媛, 等. 一种用于有色散纤维计算机测配色的制样工具及制样方法: 103196558A[P]. 2013 -07-10.
MENG Qingtao, XIE Xinsheng, GUO Yuan, et al. Sample preparation tool and sample preparation method for computer color matching with dispersion fiber: 103196558A [P]. 2013 -07-10.
[7] HUNTER Lab. Reflectance measurements: specular included versus specular excluded[J]. Application Note, 2009,13(4):1-4.
[8] LUO M R, CUI G, RIGG B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000[J]. Color Research and Application, 2001,26(5):340-350.
[9] BURLONE D A. Effect of fiber translucency on the color of blends of precolored fibers[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1990,60:162-167.
[10] RICHARD A J, ZHOU M. Influence of blending on color appearance of black and whiter fiber blends[J]. Textile Chemist and Colorist and American Dyestuff Reporter, 2000,32(10):47-51.
[1] 裘柯槟, 陈维国, 周华. 用光谱成像技术与分光光度法测量织物颜色的比较分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(11): 73-80.
[2] 胡文, 王迪, 陈晓川, 汪军, 李勇. 锯齿轧花中含棉籽棉朵模型的构建与仿真[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(09): 27-32.
[3] 程璐, 陈婷婷, 曹吉强, 王颖, 夏鑫. 基于光谱反射率的色纺纱计算机修色算法[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(09): 39-44.
[4] 裘柯槟, 陈维国, 周华, 应双双. 成像技术在纺织品颜色测量中的应用进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(09): 155-161.
[5] 应双双, 裘柯槟, 郭宇飞, 周赳, 周华. 纺织品色彩管理色表测量数据的误差优化[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(08): 74-80.
[6] 张梦阳, 陈晓川, 汪军, 李勇. 基于ANSYS CFX 的棉纤维马克隆值的建模与仿真[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(07): 29-34.
[7] 邵金鑫, 张宝昌, 曹继鹏. 基于图像处理与深度学习方法的棉纤维梳理过程纤维检测识别技术[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(07): 40-46.
[8] 杨红英, 惠志奎, 杨志晖, 张靖晶, 谢宛姿, 周金利. 基于汉风色典的不同色差公式的色差均匀性[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(02): 103-108.
[9] 赵博研, 赵玉珠. 光致变色纺织品的检测方法[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(08): 124-129.
[10] 邓茜茜, 杨瑞华, 徐亚亚, 高卫东. 转杯纺混色棉纱的纤维混合均匀度[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(07): 31-37.
[11] 黄嘉俊, 柯薇, 王静, 邓中民. 基于计算机视觉的牛仔服装色差检测评级系统[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(05): 163-169.
[12] 陶金 张德锁 林红 陈宇岳. 介孔氧化硅/棉复合纤维对染料的吸附性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(10): 93-98.
[13] 袁理 代乔民 付顺林 郑力文 鄢煜尘. 基于原色纤维混配色织物的呈色特性与影响因素分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(10): 38-43.
[14] 辛春莉 王子玉 周建 潘如如 高卫东. 数码相机在染色织物色差测量中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(08): 77-82.
[15] 陈丽丽 楼利琴 傅雅琴. 木棉纤维/棉混纺织物结构参数对其保暖透气性影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(06): 47-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!