纺织学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 119-124.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20201004806

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

热湿处理对免烫羊毛织物保形性能的影响

黄宏博1, 韩宗保1,2,3, 郭恒1,2,3, 姚金波2,3, 姜会钰2,3, 夏治刚1, 王运利1,2,3()   

  1. 1.武汉纺织大学 纺织新材料与先进加工技术国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430200
    2.武汉纺织大学 生物质纤维和生态染整湖北省重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430200
    3.武汉纺织大学 化学与化工学院, 湖北 武汉 430200
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-26 修回日期:2021-09-16 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2021-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 王运利
  • 作者简介:黄宏博(1996—),男,硕士生。主要研究方向为纺织品的功能整理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0309200)

Influence of thermal and moist treatments on shape retention performance of anti-creasing wool fabrics

HUANG Hongbo1, HAN Zongbao1,2,3, GUO Heng1,2,3, YAO Jinbo2,3, JIANG Huiyu2,3, XIA Zhigang1, WANG Yunli1,2,3()   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing Technologies, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, Hubei 430200, China
    2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Biomass Fibers and Eco-Dyeing & Finishing, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, Hubei 430200, China
    3. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, Hubei 430200, China
  • Received:2020-10-26 Revised:2021-09-16 Published:2021-12-15 Online:2021-12-29
  • Contact: WANG Yunli

摘要:

为提升热湿处理后免烫羊毛织物的保形性能,分别在不同温度和湿度条件下对免烫羊毛织物进行处理。借助织物折皱弹性测试仪、万能强力仪、扫描电子显微镜、傅里叶红外光谱仪、X射线衍射仪等对处理前后免烫羊毛织物的折皱回复角、断裂强力和微观结构进行测试与表征。结果表明:免烫羊毛织物的折皱回复角随着测试温度和相对湿度的升高而下降,其中经90%相对湿度、100 ℃条件处理的免烫羊毛织物,折皱回复角降低为原样的88.2%;当免烫羊毛织物的处理温度不变时,断裂强力随着相对湿度的增高而逐渐下降;经过较高温度热湿处理的免烫羊毛织物,其表面纤维受到损伤,结晶度基本没有变化。

关键词: 热湿处理, 免烫羊毛织物, 保形性能, 断裂强力

Abstract:

In order to maintain the shape retenion performance of anti-creasing wool fabrics, it is of great significance to study the influence of thermal and moist conditions on the fabrics shape retention performance. In this research, the orthogonal experiments were carried out to study the changes in temperature and humidity on anti-creasing wool fabrics. Wrinkle recovery angle, the breaking strength and microstructure of a selected anti-creasing wool fabric before and after treatment were characterized using fabric wrinkle elasticity tester, strength tester, scanning electron microscope, Fourier infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffractometer. The results show that the wrinkle recovery angle of the anti-creasing wool fabric decreases with the increase of temperature and relative humidity. Among them, the wrinkle recovery angle of the anti-creasing wool fabric treated with 90% relative humidity and 100 ℃ conditions is reduced to 88.2% of that of the original fabric. With fixed processing temperature, the breaking strength of the anti-creasing wool fabric gradually decreases with the increase of the relative humidity. In terms of microscopic morphology and structure, there witness damages in fibers on the fabric surface for the anti-creasing wool fabric treated with higher temperature and humidity, with no obvious change in crystallinity of the fabric.

Key words: thermal and moist treatment, anti-creasing wool fabric, shape retention performance, breaking strength

中图分类号: 

  • TS195.2

图1

经不同温湿度处理后免烫羊毛织物的折皱回复角"

表1

热湿处理后免烫羊毛织物的折皱回复角相对于原样的百分比"

处理温度/℃ 不同相对湿度下的折皱回复角相对百分比/%
30% 60% 90%
20 100.0 97.5 96.8
40 98.5 96.1 95.1
60 97.2 94.2 89.9
80 95.4 93.8 91.4
100 93.0 90.0 88.2

表2

热湿处理后免烫羊毛织物的洗涤外观平整度评级"

处理度/℃ 不同相对湿度下的外观平整度/级
30% 45% 60% 75% 90%
20 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
40 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4
60 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
80 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4
100 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4

图2

经过不同温湿度处理后免烫羊毛织物的断裂强力"

图3

在不同温湿度处理后免烫羊毛织物的表面形貌(×500) (a)Raw sample; (b)20 ℃; (c)40 ℃; (d)60 ℃; (e)80 ℃; (f)100 ℃"

图4

100 ℃条件下不同相对湿度处理的免烫羊毛织物的红外光图谱"

图5

90%相对湿度下不同温度处理的免烫羊毛织物的X射线衍射图谱"

图6

90%相对湿度下20、60、100 ℃温度处理免烫羊毛织物的TG和DTG谱图"

[1] 陈静静, 王必其, 王雪琴. 针刺复合羊毛面料的设计及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(3):49-53.
CHEN Jingjing, WANG Biqi, WANG Xueqin. Design and performance of needle-punched composite wool fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019, 40(3):49-53.
[2] 庄伟华, 杨德明, 符爱芬. 提高精纺羊毛织物褶裥保持性的后整理工艺[J]. 毛纺科技, 2019, 47(11):22-25.
ZHUANG Weihua, YANG Deming, FU Aifen. Post-finishing process to improve the pleated retention of worsted wool fabric[J]. Wool Textile Journal, 2019, 47(11):22-25.
[3] 梅静霞, 张楠, 王强. 基于修饰蛋白酶的羊毛织物防毡缩整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(6):74-79.
MEI Jingxia, ZHANG Nan, WANG Qiang. Wool anti-felting treatment based on modified protease[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019, 40(6):74-79.
[4] 王平, 王强, 范雪荣, 等. 羊毛蛋白酶防毡缩加工综述[J]. 印染, 2010, 36(5):46-49.
WANG Ping, WANG Qiang, FAN Xuerong, et al. Summary of wool protease antifelting processing[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2010, 36(5):46-49.
[5] 曾林泉. 羊毛免烫整理技术进展:一[J]. 印染, 2017, 43(8):52-55.
ZENG Linquan. Advances in technology of anti-creasing finishing of wool: 1[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2017, 43(8):52-55.
[6] 京沪津气流仪协作小组. 相对湿度对羊毛细度测定值的影响及修正[J]. 毛纺科技, 1977, 5(5):33-35.
The Beijing-Shanghai-Tianjin Airflow Instrument Cooperation Group. The influence of relative humidity on the measured value of wool fineness and its correc-tion[J]. Wool Textile Journal, 1977, 5(5):33-35.
[7] 宗亚宁, 张海霞. 纺织材料学[M]. 2版. 上海: 东华大学出版社, 2013:105-107.
ZONG Yaning, ZHANG Haixia. Textile materials science [M]. 2nd ed. Shanghai: Donghua University Press, 2013: 105-107.
[8] 韦玉辉, 宁琳, 吴雄英. 家用干衣机滚筒烘干方式对羊毛织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(7):69-74.
WEI Yuhui, NING Lin, WU Xiongying. The influence of rotating-drying method on the properties of wool fabric dried in domestic dryer[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017, 38(7):69-74.
[9] 姚穆. 纺织材料学[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国纺织出版社, 2009:49-50.
YAO Mu. Textile materials[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Textile & Apparel Press, 2009:49-50.
[10] 周玉庆. 湿、热处理条件对山羊绒性能的影响[D]. 西安:西安工程大学, 2016:37-42.
ZHOU Yuqing. The influence of humidity and heat treatment conditions on the properties of cashmere[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Polytechnic University, 2016:37-42.
[11] 韦玲俐, 邹沁杉, 王璐. 无氟自清洁功能型羊毛/羊绒混纺织物的研发[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(9):102-107.
WEI Lingli, ZOU Qinshan, WANG Lu. Preparation of fluorine-free water repellent wool/cashmere treated fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019, 40(9):102-107.
[12] NAZIFE Korkmaz Memi, SIBEL Kaplan. Wool fabric having thermal comfort management function via shape memory polyurethane finishing[J]. Journal of The Textile Institute, 2020, 111(5):734-744.
doi: 10.1080/00405000.2019.1661936
[13] 袁久刚, 季吉, 薛琪. 羊毛角蛋白在巯基乙酸胆碱中的溶解再生[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(1):35-39.
YUAN Jiugang, JI Ji, XUE Qi. Dissolution and regeneration of wool keratin in choline thioglycolate[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(1):35-39.
[14] 包红, 徐水, 张小宁. 家蚕丝素蛋白阳离子化及其对羊毛性状的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(7):24-30.
BAO Hong, XU Shui, ZHANG Xiaoning. Cationization of Bombyx mori silk fibroin and effect there of on wool traits[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019, 40(7):24-30.
[15] 贾丽霞, 金崇业, 刘瑞. 硅磷杂化阻燃整理对羊毛结构与热稳定性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(12):101-105.
JIA Lixia, JIN Chongye, LIU Rui. Influence of flame retardant finishing with silicon-phosphorus hybridization on structure and thermal stability of wool[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017, 38(12):101-105.
[16] 徐向, 李国彬, 李斌, 等. 羧甲基纤维盐阻燃羊毛织物的制备与性能研究[J]. 化学与黏合, 2016, 38(5):357-360,387.
XU Xiang, LI Guobin, LI Bin, et al. Preparation and performance of carboxymethyl cellulose salt flame-retardant wool fabric[J]. Chemistry and Adhesion, 2016, 38(5):357-360,387.
[1] 朱维维, 管丽媛, 龙家杰, 施楣梧. 超临界CO2流体处理时间对二醋酯纤维结构与性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 97-102.
[2] 郭恒, 黄宏博, 姚金波, 姜会钰, 夏治刚, 王运利. 家庭洗涤对免烫棉织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 129-136.
[3] 朱维维, 蔡冲, 张聪, 龙家杰, 施楣梧. 超临界CO2处理温度对二醋酸纤维结构与性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(03): 8-14.
[4] 姚江薇 邹专勇 闫琳琳 卫国 唐佩君. 喷气涡流纺纱线拉伸断裂强力预测模型构建与验证[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(10): 32-37.
[5] 高娜 李强 徐伯俊 刘新金 王广斌. 不同引纱方法对云纹纱成纱外观及质量的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(12): 43-48.
[6] 杨大伟 缪旭红 孙婉 蒋高明. 经编间隔织物的拉伸特征[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(04): 55-60.
[7] 杨明杰 武海良 沈艳琴 姚一军 毛宁涛. 中低温条件下聚乳酸长丝的上浆机制[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(03): 85-90.
[8] 崔红 高秀丽 张伟 吕立斌. 自捻纱的拉伸力学性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(03): 44-48.
[9] 刘笑莹 方斌 朱守艾 程隆棣 张瑞云 俞建勇. 棉/大麻纤维混纺低损耗工艺优化[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(01): 35-39.
[10] 李涛 张涛 张开瑞 王潮霞. 紫外线辐照对棉纤维结构与性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(3): 52-0.
[11] 汪南方 翦育林. 离子液体处理羊毛染色性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2011, 32(9): 79-83.
[12] 向天夏;靳向煜;吴海波;何智荣;言宏元. 无机粉体改性聚丙烯纺粘非织造布的力学性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2011, 32(5): 57-62.
[13] 苏丹 缪旭红. 多轴向经编增强材料拉伸性能的研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2011, 32(10): 61-0.
[14] 陈志华;马顺彬. 竹浆纤维含量及纬密对棉/竹浆纤维交织物力学性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(7): 38-42.
[15] 刘德驹;吴焕岭;王一群. 染整加工对喷气涡流纺棉纱强力的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(5): 86-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚玉元;陈文兴;张利;潘勇. 催化氧化型消臭蚕丝纤维的研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(03): 7 -8 .
[2] 林红;陈宇岳;任煜;仲志锋;王红卫. 经等离子体处理的蚕丝纤维结构与性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(03): 9 -10 .
[3] 黄小华;沈鼎权. 菠萝叶纤维脱胶工艺及染色性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(1): 75 -77 .
[4] 马晓光;崔桂新;董绍伟. 微波等离子体引发接枝凝胶型智能棉针织品[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(2): 13 -16 .
[5] 万振凯;李静东. 三维编织复合材料压缩损伤声发射特性分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(2): 20 -24 .
[6] 张金秋;张华;郝新敏;姜凤琴. 大麻纤维高温煮练时间与脱胶质量的关系[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(2): 81 -83 .
[7] 戴建国;陈敏之;何瑛. 立体裁剪及其适用性分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(3): 117 -120 .
[8] 李树锋;程博闻;孙坤松;宋浩疆. 接枝改性阻燃高湿模量粘胶纤维的性能研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(4): 60 -62 .
[9] 万玉芹;吴丽莉;俞建勇. 竹纤维吸湿性能研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(03): 14 -15 .
[10] 王金. 坯布直接起绒节约能源提高质量[J]. 纺织学报, 1982, 3(08): 60 .