服装阻力矩在作业效能评估中的应用研究进展

doi:10.13475/j.fzxb.20240802102

纺织学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (08): 263-271.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20240802102

服装阻力矩在作业效能评估中的应用研究进展

崔文¹, 王云仪¹^,², 戴艳阳¹, 李俊¹^,²()

1.东华大学服装与艺术设计学院, 上海 200051
2.现代服装设计与技术教育部重点实验室(东华大学), 上海 200051

收稿日期:2024-08-14 修回日期:2025-04-22 出版日期:2025-08-15 发布日期:2025-08-15
通讯作者: 李俊(1970—),男,教授,博士。主要研究方向为功能防护服装及其舒适性。E-mail:lijun@dhu.edu.cn。
作者简介:崔文(1998—),女,博士生。主要研究方向为服装舒适性与功能服装。
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目(2232024G-08);上海市科学技术委员会“科技创新行动计划”“一带一路”国际合作项目(21130750100)

Research progress in clothing resistance moment for assessment of human performance and ability

CUI Wen¹, WANG Yunyi¹^,², DAI Yanyang¹, LI Jun¹^,²()

1. College of Fashion and Design, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
2. Key Laboratory of Clothing Design & Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China

Received:2024-08-14 Revised:2025-04-22 Published:2025-08-15 Online:2025-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对现有的作业效能评估方法易受个体体能和肌力差异的影响,缺少客观、稳定的评价指标的问题,围绕可用于着装人员作业效能评估的服装阻力矩指标进行了综述。首先,对现有的两类作业效能测评方法进行汇总,分析了不同方法的现状与困境。其次,从服装的质量及结构设计、材料的力学特征等方面梳理了服装阻力矩的成因。最后,从人体骨肌力学仿真和人员作业效能预测两方面探讨了服装阻力矩在作业效能评估中的应用。分析认为,服装阻力矩与作业效能评估指标间存在紧密联系,可弥补现有方法的不足,然而目前的两类阻力矩测评方法在实际应用和有效性层面存在局限,且其在作业效能中的应用尚未形成体系。未来研究的方向可从以下角度考虑:构建服装的阻力矩与设计要素间的数学关系,量化指导服装工效性能的优化;从模拟真人体表力学特性的角度改善服装阻力矩测评装置;基于阻力矩挖掘防护服装与人员作业效能间的定量关系,从而通过引入服装阻力矩,建立完善的作业效能评估体系。

关键词: 作业效能, 防护服装, 服装阻力矩, 代谢成本, 肌肉力

Abstract:

Significance Protective clothing is used to resist the threat of external flames, ammunition and other threats. However, the bulkiness of the protective clothing will hinder wearer’s mobility and hence performance. The existing evaluation methods for human performance and ability are vulnerable to individual differences in physical fitness and muscle strength, and there is a lack of objective and stable evaluation indicators. Clothing resistance moment refers to the hindrance of clothing to human joint movement, relevant research of which has made remarkable progress. This paper reviews and analyzes the existing evaluation methods and their shortcomings, as well as discusses the influencing factors and applications of clothing resistance moment in research of human performance and ability.

Progress At present, collecting job progress and physiological load index when performing simulated job tasks are the most common evaluation methods for human performance and ability. Job progress and difficulty evaluation are a direct evaluation method for the job itself. Physiological load assessment reflects a person's ability to continue working and potential occupational health risks. The clothing resistance moment is connected with each evaluation metrics. It is mainly affected by the mechanical properties of material, the weight, looseness and detailed structure of clothing. Previous research in functional clothing has led to two types of measurement methods for clothing resistance moment, namely the calculation method based on contact force and measurement method based on the use of equipment. The former uses mechanical sensors or simulation software to measure the contact force between the wearer and clothing, and then convert it to resistance moment, and this method is widely used in tight and stiff clothing. The latter uses test equipment that simulates human activity to measure the clothing resistance moment directly. There are two types of clothing resistance moment test equipment, one is dummy/hand test device and the other is a single joint test device. The dummy device could only test one single size garment, but simulate the contact process between human and clothing. The single joint test device could match various sizes of protective clothing, but the results can only represent the torque required to bend the joint of garment through external forces in an unmanned state. Some studies established the coupling model of human body and clothing to predict the muscle force based on reverse dynamics simulation. Researchers also used clothing resistance moment to predict personnel performance based on statistical analysis.

Conclusion and Prospect At present, due to the limitations of evaluation methods and numerous factors of clothing affecting human performance and ability, the current research is still in the qualitatively exploratory stage. In order to build a stable and reliable evaluation method, further research orientations are proposed. Firstly, clothing resistance moment is a physical clothing characteristic parameter and closely related to all indicators of human performance and ability. Therefore, it can be used as a representative index of clothing mobility for unified judgment of human performance and ability. Secondly, the existing research on the impact of protective clothing are limited to the discussion of a single variable, hence lacking in analysis of the comprehensive effect of multiple factors. As a numerical intermediate variable, the clothing resistance moment can quantitatively guide the ergonomic performance design of protective clothing from the perspective of reducing the resistance moment. Thirdly, it is necessary to put forward more accurate and operable evaluation methods for clothing resistance moment. As for the contact force based calculation method, soft matrix pressure sensors can be considered for measuring distribution of pressure. Regarding the device based measurement method, the compression and friction characteristics of human skin should be simulated to optimize the existing measurement dummies. Finally, due to different experimental conditions and subjects set up in research, it is difficult to quantitatively estimate the influence of protective clothing on job effectiveness. The application of nonlinear models or other empirical formulas and statistical methods can be explored in the prediction of physical exertion or fatigue, so as to avoid the influence of individual differences on the prediction accuracy. Musculoskeletal model with the clothing resistance moment as the external load can also be constructed to analyze the dynamic response of wearers.

Key words: human performance and ability, protective clothing, clothing resistance moment, metabolic cost, muscle strength

中图分类号:

TS941.16

崔文, 王云仪, 戴艳阳, 李俊. 服装阻力矩在作业效能评估中的应用研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(08): 263-271.

CUI Wen, WANG Yunyi, DAI Yanyang, LI Jun. Research progress in clothing resistance moment for assessment of human performance and ability[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(08): 263-271.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.fzxb.org.cn/CN/10.13475/j.fzxb.20240802102

http://www.fzxb.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V46/I08/263

图/表 2

表1

图1

参考文献 54

[1]	GUPTA D.Functional clothing-definition and classification[J]. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, 2011, 36(4): 321-326.
[2]	KUMAR S D,SINGH (KAHARWAR) V,PAL M.Evaluation of wearability, kinetic and kinematic changes during wearing of three layered extreme cold weather clothing[J]. Ergonomics in Design: the Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 2023,33(1): 17-24.
[3]	WENDLAND R, BOSSI L, NAKAZA E, et al.Comparison of in-service reduced vs. full torso coverage armor for females[J]. Military Medicine, 2023, 188(9/10): 3102-3111.
[4]	TEITLEBAUM A, GOLDMAN R F.Increased energy cost with multiple clothing layers.[J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1972, 32(6): 743-744.
[5]	VINE C A J, COAKLEY S L, BLACKER S D, et al.Accuracy of metabolic cost predictive equations during military load carriage[J]. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2022, 36(5): 1297-1303.
[6]	LOONEY D P, SANTEE W R, KARIS A J, et al.Metabolic costs of military load carriage over complex terrain[J]. Military Medicine, 2018, 183(9/10): e357-e362.
[7]	DUGGAN A.Energy cost of stepping in protective clothing ensembles[J]. Ergonomics, 1988, 31(1): 3-11.
[8]	DORMAN L E, HAVENITH G.The effects of protective clothing on energy consumption during different activi-ties[J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2009, 105(3): 463-470.
[9]	HAVENITH G, HEUS R.A test battery related to ergonomics of protective clothing[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2004, 35(1): 3-20.
[10]	MAN X, SWAN C C.A mathematical modeling framework for analysis of functional clothing[J]. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2007, 2(3): 10-28.
[11]	何剑, 张万欣, 李猛, 等.航天服典型关节人服匹配试验研究[J]. 航天医学与医学工程, 2020, 33(1): 22-27.
	HE Jian, ZHANG Wanxin, LI Meng, et al.Test and study on human-suit matching based on typical joint of spacesuit[J]. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 2020, 33(1): 22-27.
[12]	QUINN T D, GUTIÉRREZ-SANTAMARÍA B, SÁEZ I, et al.Comparison of three internationally certified firefighter protective ensembles: physiological responses, mobility, and comfort[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2021, 86(1): 103232.
[13]	LIU J, HUANG Y, ZHANG Y, et al.Effects of personal protective clothing on firefighters' gait analyzed using a three-dimensional motion capture system[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2023, 29(3): 1220-1230.
[14]	LIN X, ZHAI L, ZHANG M, et al.Ergonomic evaluation of protective clothing for earthquake disaster search and rescue team members[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2016, 28(6): 820-829.
[15]	SON S Y, BAKRI I, MURAKI S, et al.Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2014, 45(4): 1019-1027.
[16]	GIJSBERTSE K, LINSSEN L, WOERING A, et al.The effects of mass, bulk and stiffness of personal protective equipment and clothing on physical performance when performing a military mobility obstacle course[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2021, 95(1): 103448.
[17]	ORR R, SIMAS V, CANETTI E, et al.Impact of various clothing variations on firefighter mobility: a pilot study[J]. Safety, 2019, 5(4): 78-96.
[18]	WU Y, SHEN Y, TIAN Y, et al.Quantifying the effects of ice hockey upper body pads on mobility and comfort[J]. iScience, 2024, 27(1): 108606.
[19]	攸璞, 方以群, 王海涛, 等.快速上浮脱险致减压病动物肺组织病理改变的研究[J]. 军事医学, 2014, 38(7): 490-492.
	YOU Pu, FANG Yiqun, WANG Haitao, et al.Pathological changes in lung tissue during fast floating escape-induced decompression sickness[J]. Military Medical Sciences, 2014, 38(7): 490-492.
[20]	LOONEY D P, LAVOIE E M, VANGALA S V, et al.Modeling the metabolic costs of heavy military backpacking[J]. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2022, 54(4): 646-654.
[21]	BACH A J E, COSTELLO J T, BORG D N, et al.The Pandolf load carriage equation is a poor predictor of metabolic rate while wearing explosive ordnance disposal protective clothing[J]. Ergonomics, 2017, 60(3): 430-438.
[22]	COCA A, ROBERGE R, SHEPHERD A, et al.Ergonomic comparison of a chem/bio prototype firefighter ensemble and a standard ensemble[J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2008, 104(2): 351-359.
[23]	LI X, DING L, HEDGE A, et al.An experimental study on the ergonomics indices of partial pressure suits[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2013, 44(3): 393-403.
[24]	LENTON G, AISBETT B, NEESHAM-SMITH D, et al.The effects of military body armour on trunk and hip kinematics during performance of manual handling tasks[J]. Ergonomics, 2016, 59(6): 806-812.
[25]	O'HEARN B E, BENSEL C K.Biomechanical analyses of body movement and locomotion as affected by clothing and footwear for cold weather climates[R]. United States: Development and Engineering Command Natick Soldier Center, 2005.
[26]	RENBERG J, CHRISTIANSEN M T, WIGGEN 􀱤 N, et al.Metabolic rate and muscle activation level when wearing state-of-the-art cold-weather protective clothing during level and inclined walking[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2020, 82(1): 102956.
[27]	MURPHY M, PATTON J, MELLO R, et al.Energy cost of physical task performance in men and women wearing chemical protective clothing[J]. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 2001, 72(1): 25-31.
[28]	LENTON G K, SAXBY D J, LLOYD D G, et al.Primarily hip-borne load carriage does not alter biomechanical risk factors for overuse injuries in soldiers[J]. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2019, 22(2): 158-163.
[29]	SOULE R G, GOLDMAN R F.Energy cost of loads carried on the head, hands, or feet.[J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1969, 27(5): 687-690.
[30]	LEE J Y, KIM S, JANG Y J, et al.Component contribution of personal protective equipment to the alleviation of physiological strain in firefighters during work and recovery[J]. Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis, 2014, 57(7): 1068-1077.
[31]	BARKER R L.A review of gaps and limitations in test methods for first responder protective clothing and equipment: a final report presented to national personal protection technology laboratory, national institute for occupational safety and health (NIOSH)[R]. US: National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, 2005.
[32]	COCA A, WILLIAMS W J, ROBERGE R J, et al.Effects of fire fighter protective ensembles on mobility and performance[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2010, 41(4): 636-641.
[33]	DORMAN L E, HAVENITH G.Examining the impact of protective clothing on range of movement[R]. United Kingdom: Loughborough University, 2007.
[34]	DORMAN L E, HAVENITH G, BROEDE P, et al.Modelling the metabolic effects of protective clo-thing[C]//Poland: Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 2006.
[35]	PARK H, HAHN K H Y.Perception of firefighters' turnout ensemble and level of satisfaction by body movement[J]. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 2014, 7(2): 85-95.
[36]	DEANE N, GU Y, KAO P C, et al.Pressure monitoring based identification of the EOD suit:human interface load distribution[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 2021, 5(3): 410-423.
[37]	DONATI M, VITIELLO N, DE ROSSI S M M, et al.A flexible sensor technology for the distributed measurement of interaction pressure[J]. Sensors, 2013, 13(1): 1021-1045.
[38]	DE ROSSI S M M, VITIELLO N, LENZI T, et al.Sensing pressure distribution on a lower-limb exoskeleton physical human-machine interface[J]. Sensors, 2011, 11(1): 207-227.
[39]	HORIBA Y, TOKUTAKE A, INUI S.Prediction of clothing mobility using a musculoskeletal simulator[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2019, 32(1): 132-147.
[40]	SERRANCOLI G, FALISSE A, DEMBIA C, et al.Subject-exoskeleton contact model calibration leads to accurate interaction force predictions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2019, 27(8): 1597-1605.
[41]	SCHMIDT P B, NEWMAN D J, HODGSON E.Modeling space suit mobility: applications to design and operations[J].2001: DOI:10.4271/2001-01-2162
[42]	NELSON G, SAUNDERS A, NEVILLE N, et al.PETMAN: a humanoid robot for testing chemical protective clothing[J]. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 2012, 30(4): 372-377.
[43]	王建宇.舱外航天服关节力学特性测试机器人系统的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2008:26-27.
	WANG Jianyu.Research on robotic system for eva spacesuit joint's damping paramenters measuring[D]. Haerbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2008: 26-27.
[44]	尹锐, 张瑞明.一种轨迹可控的航天服关节阻力矩测试装置: CN 202011566169.5[P]. 2021-05-07.
	YING Rui, ZHANG Ruiming.A path-controllable device of measuring a space suit joint resistance moment: CN 202011566169.5[P]. 2021-05-07.
[45]	LI J, YE Q, DING L, et al.Modeling and dynamic simulation of astronaut's upper limb motions considering counter torques generated by the space suit[J]. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 20(9): 929-940.
[46]	王晓东, 王春慧, 王政, 等.人服系统上肢交互生物力学仿真模型[J]. 医用生物力学, 2015, 30(6): 540-546+557.
	WANG Xiaodong, WANG Chunhui, WANG Zheng, et al.Biomechanical simulation model of upper limb interaction for human-spacesuit system[J]. Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2015, 30(6): 540-546, 557.
[47]	张新军, 李潭秋, 张万欣, 等.航天服关节力矩的数学模型[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(3): 865-871.
	ZHANG Xinjun, Ll Tanqiu, ZHANG Wanxin, et al.Mathematical model for spacesuit joint torque[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(3): 865-871.
[48]	SCHAUB K, CARAGNANO G, BRITZKE B, et al.The European assembly worksheet[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2013, 14(6): 616-639.
[49]	王诗潭, 王云仪.防护服活动性及其对职业骨肌损伤影响的研究进展[J]. 丝绸, 2018, 55(8): 52-59.
	WANG Shitan, WANG Yunyi.Research progress on protective clothing mobility and its impact on musculoskeletal injury[J]. Journal of Silk, 2018, 55(8): 52-59.
[50]	DIAZ A, NEWMAN D.Musculoskeletal human-spacesuit interaction model[C]//2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, MT, USA:IEEE, 2014: 1-13.
[51]	DING L, LI J, TIAN Y, et al.Factors affecting astronaut manual operation tasks[C]//Human Performance in Space: Advancing Astronautics Researh in China. USA:Science/AAAS, 2014: 30-31.
[52]	SCHMIDT P B.An investigation of space suit mobility with applications to EVA operations[D]. Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001:148-173.
[53]	BOSSI L L M, MORTON A, SY A, et al.Understanding the trade-offs between protection, performance and integrated survivability[J]. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2017, 20(1): S139.
[54]	郑捷文, 谌玉红, 李晨明, 等.模拟负荷行走疲劳感评价模型的研究[J]. 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志, 2015, 33(6): 444-447.
	ZHENG Jiewen, SHEN Yuhong, LI Chenming, et al.Study on perceived fatigue evaluating model during simulated load carriage[J]. Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, 2015, 33(6): 444-447.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

标准编号	标准名称	测试方法	客观指标	主观指标
BS 8469—2007	《消防员个体防护设备—人体工程学和兼容性评估—要求和试验方法》	连续的任务动作	任务完成耗时;心率、核心温度、出汗量	任务完成难度、视野受限程度、装备零部件稳定性;动作束缚度、感知用力程度、舒适度
ASTM F1154—2018	《评估防护服、元件和其他组件的舒适性、合体性、功能和耐用性》	连续的任务动作	任务完成耗时	任务完成难度;合体度、着装舒适度
ASTM F3031—2017	《急救人员防护服的活动范围评估标准规程》	10项全身动作	ROM、最大可及距离	装备零部件稳定性、全身、上下半身、手臂和肩部的活动能力
NIJ 0117.01—2016	《公共安全防爆服标准》	10项全身动作、连续的任务动作	ROM、任务完成程度和耗时	无
BS EN 14225—2017	《潜水服-要求和测试方法》	连续的任务动作	无	任务完成难度、腿部和手臂的活动能力;呼吸难度
NASA-STD-3001—2022	《NASA太空飞行人体-系统标准》	坐姿上肢动作	手各个方向的力量	无

服装阻力矩在作业效能评估中的应用研究进展

Research progress in clothing resistance moment for assessment of human performance and ability

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 54

相关文章 9

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	丛洪莲, 方蕾妹, 姜菲, 李慧建, 俞旭良. 基于功能分区的横编防护外套模块化设计[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(05): 227-235.
[2]	马帅, 张西临, 黄宽, 王崴, 瞿珏. 中国男性飞行员体型特征分类[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(01): 163-169.
[3]	杨光, 杨小兵, 栗丽, 姚之凤, 周川, 张明明. 新修定的化学防护服国家标准解析[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(03): 163-168.
[4]	戴艳阳, 王诗潭, 王云仪, 李俊. 基于运动生物力学的防护服装活动性能研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(11): 212-218.
[5]	翟丽娜, 李俊, 杨允出. 热防护服装测评用传感器的发展及其研究现状[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(10): 188-196.
[6]	何佳臻, 薛萧昱, 王敏, 李俊. 基于最大衰减因子模型的服装热防护性能预测[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(06): 112-117.
[7]	陈思卢业虎戴晓群王敏. 高温液体及蒸汽防护服装防护性能研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(05): 144-149.
[8]	王敏李俊李小辉. 燃烧假人在火场热防护服装研究中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2013, 34(3): 154-160.
[9]	张向辉;王云仪;李俊;张文斌. 防护服装结构设计对着装舒适性的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(06): 138-144.