纺织学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (03): 131-137.doi: 10.3475/j.fzxb.20160303307

• 服装工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

服装里料性能的综合评价

  

  • 收稿日期:2016-03-18 修回日期:2016-11-17 出版日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2017-03-16

Comprehensive evaluation on  garment lining properties

  • Received:2016-03-18 Revised:2016-11-17 Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-16

摘要:

针对服装里料性能指标较多的问题,采用综合评价方法对其进行排序。首先,将各指标的类型一致化,将极小型指标和区间型指标均转化为极大型;然后消除各指标间量纲和量级间的差异;再确定各指标的权重系数;最后,将多项性能指标合成一个综合评价指标。对比分析结果表明:采用综合评价方法,即先用极大化线性比例法消除指标间量纲和量级的差异,经极差确定权重,再用多项指标线性加权,得出的评价指标数值差异较大,可更好地区分服装里料性能之间的差异;10种服装里料中羽纱布排名第1,性价比高;有光弹力色丁布因3项性能指标较差,性价比最低。

关键词: 服装里料, 综合评价, 权重系数, 羽纱布, 有光弹力色丁布

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem on too many indicatirs to describe garment linings' performance, the comprehensive evaluation method should be employed to rand them. Firstly, the type of indicators should be consistent, i.e. the indicators of minimal type or interval type should be converted into the maximumal type. Secondly, the difference of dimension and magnitude between different indicators should be eliminated. Thirdly, the weight factor should be determined.  Finally, a comprehensive evaluating index was integrated. Comparison indicates the comperhensive evaluation method is adopted, i.e. the maximizing linear propirtion method is firstly adopted to eliminate the difference between dimension and magintude, the weight is determined by the rank factor and the linear weight is performed so as to obtain the larger difference, and it could distinguish the garment linings better. In the 10 kinds of garment linings, the camlet ranks number one, which has a higher performance to price ratio, and the bright elastic satin ranks the lowest because three properties are the worst.

Key words: garment lining, comprehensive evaluating, weight factor, camlet, bright elastic satin

中图分类号: 

  • TS 941.498
[1] 高广明 朱江晖 许丽慧 孙莉 谷芬芬. C2C环境下服装零售感知服务质量综合评价模型[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(08): 164-170.
[2] 朱江晖 高广明 富宁钰. 服装电商卖家的测评指标体系与综合评价模型[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(07): 159-164.
[3] 王利军 王春红 龙碧璇 YOUSFANI Sheraz Hussain Siddique 徐磊. 乌拉草/棉/维纶复合纱线的开发与性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(12): 49-53.
[4] 彭佳佳 蒋高明 卢致文 丛洪莲 杨茜. 全成形毛衫在双针床电脑横机上的编织工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(11): 51-0.
[5] 陈彩霞 杨以雄 孙妙迪. 服装仓储配送评价体系构建与案例分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(8): 109-0.
[6] 刘哲. 基于图像分析的织物外观质量综合评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(11): 61-65.
[7] 黄淑平;马崇启;周衡书. 竹原纤维织物热湿舒适性的灰色关联评价模型[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(9): 33-36.
[8] 倪红;彭晓东. 半精纺针织衫服用性能的模糊综合评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(12): 99-102.
[9] 阎玉秀;季晓芬;胡觉亮;章谛梦;蔡丽玲. 服装企业供应商综合评价指标体系设计[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(02): 130-134.
[10] MENG Jianjun孟建军. 高速经编机凸轮从动件运动规律的模糊综合评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2008, 29(12): 100-102.
[11] 贺金凤. 纺织企业技术改造效果的综合评价研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(01): 112-114.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!