纺织学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 87-91.

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同纺织品甲醛检测标准对比及检测结果回归分析

陈丽华   

  1. 北京服装学院服装艺术与工程学院
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-15 修回日期:2012-05-10 出版日期:2012-08-15 发布日期:2012-08-08
  • 通讯作者: 陈丽华 E-mail:wclh@sina.com

Contrasts between different formaldehyde test standards of textiles and regression analysis of formaldehyde determination results

 CHEN  Li-Hua   

  1. School of Fashion Art and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology
  • Received:2011-08-15 Revised:2012-05-10 Online:2012-08-15 Published:2012-08-08
  • Contact: CHEN Li-Hua E-mail:wclh@sina.com

摘要: 摘 要:本文对不同纺织品甲醛检测标准进行了对比分析,测试分析了各标准间差异对甲醛检测结果的影响和各检测结果间的回归性。结果表明:水萃取法的GB(SO)标准与JIS标准间苯三酚法差异较大。蒸汽吸收法的GB(SO)标准与JIS标准差异较大,与AATCC标准有个别差异;甲醛检测结果:GB(ISO)标准释放甲醛较游离和水解甲醛明显要高,AATCC较GB(ISO)标准释放甲醛高很多,JIS与GB(ISO)标准的游离和水解甲醛相差不大;各标准甲醛检测结果间具有十分显著线性回归关系,且拟合程度很好。其研究结果对我国纺织服装企业或检测机构更好地应用甲醛检测标准具有重要的指导意义

关键词: 检测标准 , 甲醛检测 , 标准对比 , 回归分析

Abstract: Abstract In this paper, the contrasts between different formaldehyde testing standards were analyzed ,the influences of different formaldehyde testing standards on formaldehyde determination results and the correlation between formaldehyde determination results were tested and researched. It is showed that there are a great deal of differences between GB(ISO) standard and JIS standard of resorcin in water extraction method,that there are a great deal of differences between GB(ISO) standard and JIS standard in vapour absorption method,and that there is individual difference between GB(ISO) standard and AATCC standard in vapour absorption method. It is also showed that released formaldehyde content of GB(ISO)testing standards is higher than free and hydrolyzed formaldehyde content of GB(ISO)testing standards, that released formaldehyde content of AATCC testing standards is higher than released formaldehyde content of GB(ISO)testing standards, that free and hydrolyzed formaldehyde content of JIS testing standards and GB(ISO)testing standards is not too different.The linear regression of formaldehyde determination results of the testing standards are highly significant and well fitting.The research results can supply a certain reference to the better application of formaldehyde testing standards to textiles industry and testing organization.

Key words: testing standards ,  , determination of formaldehyde ,  , standards contrast ,  , regression analysis

[1] 高融 王玲 杨以雄. 服装线上零售渠道消费者决策机制[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(12): 146-152.
[2] 周小溪 梁惠娥 陈潇潇 董稚雅 秦潇璇. 春夏季衬衫用色织面料材质的感觉评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(08): 59-64.
[3] 陈丽华. 织物定伸长力与弹力服装宽裕量的关系[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(07): 115-0120.
[4] 丛洪莲 徐巧 金兰名. 咖啡炭/聚酯长丝纬编提花床垫面料的性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(03): 37-0.
[5] 阎玉秀 高婕 金子敏 唐洁芳 陶建伟. 女子篮球运动内衣压力对心率变异指标的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(6): 100-0.
[6] 张新杰 丛洪莲. 结构参数对割圈绒织物热湿舒适性的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(1): 46-0.
[7] 邹平 朴江玉 吴世刚 边小佩. 驳折领翻领松度结构设计数学模型的建立[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(1): 107-.
[8] 张爱萍, 王云仪, 姚怡. 服装胸围截面上距离松量的分配关系[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(6): 76-80.
[9] 张长欢, 陈丽华. 纺织品pH值不同检测标准间差异及检测结果相关性分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(5): 46-49.
[10] 韩挺, 胡杰明, 孙守迁. 基于消费者感知的面料材质感官意象研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(5): 140-144.
[11] 孙凌, 杨雪, 陈汉军. 固定资产投资与废水减排关系的回归分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(3): 135-138.
[12] 张伍连 丁辛 杨旭东. 方平组织PVC涂层膜材料的塑性变形性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2011, 32(7): 65-69.
[13] 王建君;李晓峰;王文虎. 烘箱空气湿度与纤维回潮率的非线性回归分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(1): 24-27.
[14] 徐先林;李培玲;张 志;朱 虹. 粗纺纯绒纱条干分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(06): 29-33.
[15] 刘咏梅;何海洋;姚娟. 基于面料弹性贴体针织衣身数学模型的建立[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(04): 101-105.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!