Journal of Textile Research ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 193-198.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20240104201

• Apparel Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative analysis of contact perception between dry and wet fabrics

ZHANG Zhaohua1,2, YANG Yue1, NI Jun1(), ZHANG Xu1   

  1. 1. College of Fashion and Design, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    2. Key Laboratory of High Performance Fibers and Products, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2024-01-22 Revised:2024-07-11 Online:2024-11-15 Published:2024-12-30
  • Contact: NI Jun E-mail:nj2000@dhu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Objective The production of skin moisture perception does not necessarily require water; however, contact with dry and cold fabrics can also induce a wet perception due to skin cooling. Nevertheless, no comparative analysis of the subjective feeling when using the same fabric with consistent skin cooling has been proposed. This research aims to explore the influence of dry and wet fabrics on subjective perception by controlling for an equal amount of skin temperature drop.

Method The pre-test determined the amount of water added to the wet fabric when the skin cooling was equivalent to that of the dry fabric. Three groups of controlled skin cooling experiments were designed, with skin cooling set at 0.9 ℃ (produced by contacting 18 ℃ dry fabric or wet fabric with 2 mL water added), 1.2 ℃ (produced by contacting 13 ℃ dry fabric or wet fabric with 12 mL water added) and 1.4 ℃ (produced by contacting 8 ℃ dry fabric or wet fabric with 16 mL water added), respectively. Sixteen subjects were invited to touch fabrics from each of the three different groups and report their subjective sensation scores for cold/warmth, dryness/wet ness and smooth ness/roughness.

Results The Wilcoxon non-parametric test results were conducted on the two associated samples. It was found that the cold sensation of dry fabric at 18 ℃ was significantly stronger than that of the wet fabric with 12 mL water (Z=-2.961, P=0.003). Additionally, the dry fabric at 13 ℃ had a significantly stronger cold sensation compared to the wet fabric with 12 mL (Z=-2.456, P=0.014), but no significant difference existed between the dry fabric at 8 ℃ and the wet fabric with 16 mL water (Z=-1.611, P=0.107). No significant difference existed in roughness sensation between the dry fabric at 18 ℃ and the wet fabric with 2 mL water (Z=-1.459, P=0.145), while roughness of the dry fabric at 13 ℃ was significantly lower than that of the wet fabric with 12 mL (Z=-2.645, P=0.008), and roughness of the dry fabric at 8 ℃ was significantly lower than that of the wet fabric with 16 mL water (Z=-2.646, P=0.008). The wet sensation scores showed no significant difference between the dry fabric at 18 ℃ and the wet fabric with 2 mL water (Z=-0.656, P=0.512), while the wet feeling of the wet fabric with 12 mL water was significantly stronger than that of the dry fabric at 13 ℃ (Z=-2.616, P=0.009), and the same was found between wet sensation of the wet fabric with 16 mL water and the dry fabric at 8 ℃(Z=-3.339, P=0.001). Specifically, when the skin temperature drop increased to approximately 1.2 ℃ and 1.4 ℃, the wetness of the wet fabric was significantly stronger. The Friedman test was adopted to further analyze changes in the wetness of both dry and wet fabrics with temperature and water addition. The perception of wetness in dry fabrics among the three groups showed significant differences (χ2=10.906, P=0.004), with a significantly stronger sensation of wetness in the dry fabric at 13 ℃ compared to that in the dry fabric at 18 ℃ (Sig.=1). Significant differences existed in perceived wetness among different groups for wet fabrics (χ2=24.875, P<0.001), where a lower sensation of wetness was observed for the wet fabric with 2 mL water compared to that for both the 12 mL and 16 mL soaked fabrics (Sig.=1).

Conclusion When the skin cooling is (0.965±0.015) ℃ and (1.165±0.015) ℃, the cold sensation of dry fabric is significantly stronger than that of wet fabric in the same group (P<0.05), indicating that a larger initial temperature difference makes it easier to experience a strong feeling of coldness. When the skin temperature consistently drops to(0.965±0.015) ℃, neither the dry nor wet state of the fabric significantly affects the perception of smoothness/roughness or dryness/wetness. In groups 2 and 3, wet fabrics feel rougher and wetter compared to dry fabrics, indicating that higher moisture content (12 mL, 16 mL) increases adhesion to the skin and enhances sensations of roughness and wetness. The comparative research of dry and water-containing fabrics enriches the theoretical basis of contact sensing characteristics. In the wetness reproduction device, the immersion feeling of wetness in the virtual world can be increased by reducing the contact temperature.

Key words: wetness sensation, contact perception, dry fabric, wet fabric, subjective evaluation, skin temperature

CLC Number: 

  • TS941.16

Fig.1

Moving diagram"

Tab.1

Corresponding temperature of dry and wet fabrics and water addition"

皮温下降量/℃ 干织物温度/℃ 湿织物加水量/mL
0.9 18 2
1.2 13 12
1.4 8 16

Fig.2

Experimental setup"

Tab.2

Four-dimensional Kendall's W test results"

感觉 Kendall's W χ2 Sig.
冷/暖 0.649 51.940 0.000
干/湿 0.593 47.427 0.000
粗糙/光滑 0.260 20.832 0.001

Fig.3

Warmth and cold sensation scores"

Fig.4

Smoothness and roughness sensation scores"

Fig.5

Dryness and wetness sensation scores"

[1] GATES D M, CLARK R P, EDHOLM O G. Man and his thermal environment[J]. Arctic and Alpine Research, 1986, 18(4): 445.
[2] ZHANG Z H, TANG X N, LI J, et al. The effect of dynamic friction with wet fabrics on skin wetness perception[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2020, 26(2): 370-383.
doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1453023 pmid: 29537944
[3] KATO I, MASUDA Y, NAGASHIMA K. Characteri-stics of wet perception during the static touch of moist paper by the index fingertip alongside thermal stimulus application[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2023, 258: 1-7.
[4] TANG K M, KAN C, FAN J. Assessing and predicting the subjective wetness sensation of textiles: subjective and objective evaluation[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015, 85(8): 838-849.
[5] 张昭华, 唐香宁, 李俊, 等. 织物与皮肤动态接触下的湿感觉阈限与强度评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(2): 93-100.
ZHANG Zhaohua, TANG Xiangning, LI Jun, et al. Threhold and intensity evaluation of skin wetness perception under dynamic contact with fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(2):93-100.
[6] CHAU K H, TANG K M, KAN C. Subjective wet perception assessment of fabrics with different drying time[J]. Royal Society Open Science, 2018, 5(8): 1-8.
[7] RACCUGLIA M, HODDER S, HAVENITH G. Human wetness perception in relation to textile water absorption parameters under static skin contact[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2017, 87(20): 2449-2463.
[8] MERRICK C, ROSATI R, FILINGERI D. The role of friction on skin wetness perception during dynamic interactions between the human index finger pad and materials of varying moisture content[J]. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2022, 127(3): 725-736.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00382.2021 pmid: 35044853
[9] FILINGERI D, FOURNET D, HODDER S, et al. Body mapping of cutaneous wetness perception across the human torso during thermo-neutral and warm environmental exposures[J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2014, 117(8): 887-897.
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00535.2014 pmid: 25103965
[10] SHIBAHARA M, SATO K. Illusion of wet sensation by controlling temperature and softness of dry cloth[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 371-379.
[11] PEIRIS R L, CHAN L, MINAMIZAWA K. Liquid reality: wetness sensations on the face for virtual reality[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing,2018: 366-378.
[12] HAN T. Exploring wetness illusion on fingertips to enhance immersive experience in VR[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu: ACM, 2020: 1-10.
[13] SHIBAHARA M, SATO K. Illusion of wetness by dynamic touch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2019, 12(4): 533-541.
doi: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2919575 pmid: 31150346
[14] SWEENEY M M, BRANSON D H. Sensorial comfort: part I: a psychophysical method for assessing moisture sensation in clothing[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1990, 60(7): 371-377.
[15] BAZHENOV S. Dissipation of energy by bulletproof aramid fabric[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1997, 32(15): 4167-4173.
[1] SHI Chu, LI Jun, WANG Yunyi. Research progress on smart footwear for monitoring temperature in diabetic foot [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(07): 240-247.
[2] DING Xiaodie, TANG Hong, GAO Qiang, ZHANG Chengjiao. Cold and hot changes in upper torso skin temperature and division of heat regulation zones [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(05): 147-154.
[3] KE Ying, LIN Lei, ZHENG Qing, WANG Hongfu. Influence of heating area distribution of electrical heating clothing on human thermal comfort [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(04): 188-194.
[4] CHENG Ziqi, LU Yehu, XU Jingxian. Heat transfer simulation and parametric design of electric heating textile system [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(02): 206-213.
[5] YANG Yudie, LI Chengzhang, JIN Jian, ZHENG Jingjing. Design and evaluation of suspenders for fire-fighting protective clothing considering upper limb mobility [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(11): 183-189.
[6] DU Jihui, SU Yun, LIU Guangju, TIAN Miao, LI Jun. Research and design of temperature-control intelligent thermal gloves with wearing comfort [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(04): 172-178.
[7] CHEN Ying, SONG Zetao, ZHENG Xiaohui, JIANG Yan, CHANG Suqin. Study on cooling performance of evaporative cooling garment [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(11): 141-147.
[8] ZHANG Zhaohua, CHEN Zhirui, LI Luyao, XIAO Ping, PENG Haoran, ZHANG Yuhan. Airflow sensitivity of local human skin and its influencing factors [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(12): 125-130.
[9] NIU Mengyu, PAN Shuwen, DAI Hongqin, LÜ Kaimin. Relationship between thermal-moist comfort of medical protective clothing and human fatigue [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(07): 144-150.
[10] HUANG Qianqian, LI Jun. Research progress on mechanism of human thermal sensation under ambient temperature step change [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(04): 188-194.
[11] ZHENG Qing, WANG Hongfu, KE Ying, LI Shuang. Design and evaluation of cooling clothing by phase change materials for miners [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(03): 124-129.
[12] CHU Xinxin, XIAO Hong, FAN Jie. Using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to classify fabrics for coolness level [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019, 40(02): 105-113.
[13] . Evaluation of warmth retention property of scarf [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(12): 129-134.
[14] . Influence of clothing adopting ventilation system on thermal comfort [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(10): 94-97.
[15] . Objective evaluation on wrinkling of garment joints based on wavelet analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2016, 37(12): 87-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!