纺织学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 207-213.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20250804101

• 服装工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

软体手指压力与速度对长直线缝纫偏差的影响

王建萍1,2,3,4, 储林萍1,2,3, 沈津竹1,2,3,5(), 张帆6   

  1. 1.东华大学 服装与艺术设计学院, 上海 200051
    2.东华大学 现代服装设计与技术教育部重点实验室, 上海 200051
    3.东华大学 上海市纺织智能制造与工程一带一路国际联合实验室, 上海 200051
    4.同济大学 上海国际设计创新研究院, 上海 200092
    5.马德里理工大学 工程与工业设计高等技术学院, 西班牙 马德里 28012
    6.苏州柔触机器人科技有限公司, 江苏 苏州 215600
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-19 修回日期:2025-11-11 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2026-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 沈津竹(1996—),女,博士生。主要研究方向为服装先进制造技术。E-mail:1219101@mail.dhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王建萍(1962—),女,教授,博士。主要研究方向为服装先进制造技术。
  • 基金资助:
    张家港市科技计划项目(ZKYY2337);上海高校本科重点教改项目(SJG23-06);中国纺织工业联合会高等教育教学改革项目(2021BKJGLX123);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金;东华大学研究生创新基金项目(CUSF-DH-D-2024018)

Influences of soft finger compression and speed on long straight-line sewing deviations

WANG Jianping1,2,3,4, CHU Linping1,2,3, SHEN Jinzhu1,2,3,5(), ZHANG Fan6   

  1. 1. College of Fashion and Art Design, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Clothing Design and Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    3. Shanghai Belt and Road Joint Laboratory of Textile Intelligent Manufacturing, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    4. Shanghai International College of Design & Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    5. Higher Technical School of Engineering and Industrial Design, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid 28012, Spain
    6. Suzhou Rochu Robotics Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu 215600, China
  • Received:2025-08-19 Revised:2025-11-11 Published:2026-01-15 Online:2026-01-15

摘要:

为探究不同缝纫速度下,软体手指对面料按压力与送布速度组合对长直线缝纫偏差的影响,以九宫格拼布工艺中的2条布条拼接阶段为研究对象,选择拼布常用的3种纯棉面料,将长直线缝纫轨迹划分为3个缝纫区段进行3次循环直线缝纫。结合力控技术,使用软体手指作为UR5机械臂末端执行器按压送布,以软体手指的压力和速度作为试验因素,每个因素均设计5个水平,进行L25(52)正交试验。通过极差分析与方差分析发现:不同缝纫速度下,3种面料的3个循环缝制段对应的最佳软体手指压力与速度组合存在差异,且软体手指的压力、速度及其交互作用对缝纫偏差的影响也因缝纫速度和循环缝制段的不同而不同。进一步构建支持向量回归模型,对缝纫偏差进行预测,并分别采用网格搜索、贝叶斯优化与粒子群优化方法进行超参数优化。优化结果表明:优化后模型在训练集与测试集上的表现均显著优于未优化模型,使用网格搜索优化得到的模型泛化能力和优化效率最佳(均方根误差为0.039 7 mm,优化耗时为26.52 s)。

关键词: 缝纫机器人, 软体手指, 缝纫速度, 长直线缝纫, 缝纫偏差, 正交试验, 支持向量回归

Abstract:

Objective In order to explore the influence of fingers compression force and sewing speed on the sewing deviations during long straight-line sewing process, the collaborative control of the robot and the sewing machine during this process was studied. This contributes to improving the theoretical research on long straight-line intelligent sewing, expanding the convenitional quilting sewing theory and production methods, and would provide certain theoretical references for the research on unmanned sewing methods for clothing.

Method This study focused on nine-square grid quilting, using three common pure cotton fabrics. The long straight-line sewing path was divided into three segments with three repeated sewing. Two soft fingers served as the UR5 arm's end-effector, with force sensors monitoring their normal contact force and feeding speed during sewing. L25 (52) orthogonal experiments were carried out to investigate the influences of force and speed combinations applied by soft fingers on the sewing deviations. A support vector regression model optimized by grid search (GS), Bayesian optimization (BO), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) was established to predict the sewing deviations.

Results When the sewing speed was set to the gear 2, the optimal combination of force and speed for the soft fingers of the fabric 1# in the three sewing segments is (24 N, 9.5 mm/s), (24 N, 10.5 mm/s), and (24 N, 10.5 mm/s); for fabric 2#, the optimal combination is (28 N, 8 mm/s), (22 N, 10.5 mm/s), and (26 N, 10 mm/s); and for fabric 3#, the optimal combination is (24 N, 9.5 mm/s), (22 N, 10 mm/s), and (22 N, 10 mm/s). For the first sewing segment of fabric 1#, the influence of the soft finger speed on the sewing deviation is the greatest, followed by the interaction effect. For the second and third sewing segments of fabric 1#, the soft finger force, speed, and their interaction all have an impact on the sewing deviation. Among them, the interaction has the strongest impact on the second segment, while soft finger speed dominates the third segment. Before optimization, the support vector regression (SVR) model only had a small portion of the predicted values close to the actual values on both the training set and the test set. When the actual values were large, the corresponding predicted value distribution was relatively scattered, deviating significantly from the ideal line. After optimization using GS, BO, and PSO, the performance of the SVR model on the training set and the test set was significantly better than that of the unoptimized model. Among them, the model obtained by optimizing with GS had the best generalization ability and optimization efficiency (root-mean-square error of 0.039 7 mm, optimization time of 26.52 s), and most of the predicted values were concentrated near the ideal line, meaning they were close to the actual values.

Conclusion At the same sewing speed, the optimal combinations of soft finger compression force and sewing speed differ among the three-cycle sewing segments for the same fabric, and also vary across different fabrics for the same sewing segment. For the same fabric, the influence of soft finger force, speed, and their interaction on sewing deviations vary with sewing speed and cyclic sewing segment, with significant differences observed between different fabrics. Therefore, the optimal combinations of robotic arm parameters for different sewing segments of various fabrics under different sewing speeds should be dynamically matched according to the specific fabric, sewing segment, and sewing speed. This approach can effectively reduce sewing deviations and improve sewing accuracy. The optimized support vector regression models outperform the unoptimized ones significantly in both training and test sets. Among them, the model optimized by GS exhibits the best generalization ability and optimization efficiency. Thus, the support vector regression model optimized by GS can relatively accurately and efficiently predict the absolute value of sewing deviation for different sewing segments and robotic arm parameter combinations under varying sewing speeds.

Key words: sewing robot, soft finger, sewing speed, long straight-line sewing, sewing deviation, orthogonal experiment, support vector regression

中图分类号: 

  • TS941.63

图1

多循环直线缝纫图"

图2

试验设备与材料图"

表1

面料性能参数表"

面料
编号
面密度/
(g·m-2)
厚度/
mm
弯曲长度/mm 弹性模量/MPa
经向 纬向 经向 纬向
1# 190.467 0.391 0.10 0.07 6.33 9.55
2# 225.333 0.422 0.26 0.23 3.68 10.20
3# 232.400 0.452 0.40 0.15 3.45 9.88

表2

因子水平表"

缝纫
速度
水平 A
压力/N
B
速度/(mm·s-1)
缝制段1 缝制段2 缝制段3
2档 1 20 8.0 9.0 9.0
2 22 8.5 9.5 9.5
3 24 9.0 10.0 10.0
4 26 9.5 10.5 10.5
5 28 10.0 11.0 11.0
3档 1 20 13.0 13.0 13.0
2 22 13.5 13.5 13.5
3 24 14.0 14.0 14.0
4 26 14.5 14.5 14.5
5 28 15.0 15.0 15.0
5档 1 20 24.0 25.0 25.0
2 22 24.5 25.5 25.5
3 24 25.0 26.0 26.0
4 26 25.5 26.5 26.5
5 28 26.0 27.0 27.0

图3

3种面料的3个缝制段对应的最佳参数组合"

表3

优化后的最佳超参数组合"

模型 正则化参数C 核函数参数σ 不敏感参数ε
GS-SVR 10.000 0 0.100 0 0.500 0
BO-SVR 4.278 0 0.100 9 0.679 3
PSO-SVR 49.900 7 0.100 0 0.693 2

表4

模型效果评估"

模型 E/mm R2 T/s
训练集 测试集 训练集 测试集
SVR 1.117 0 1.063 0 0.502 9 0.486 3
GS-SVR 0.008 1 0.039 7 0.712 3 0.695 7 26.52
BO-SVR 0.855 8 0.813 0 0.708 2 0.699 5 63.85
PSO-SVR 0.855 5 0.813 9 0.708 4 0.698 8 339.12

图4

优化前后SVR训练集及测试集回归图"

[1] 吴柳波, 李新荣, 杜金丽. 基于轮廓提取的缝纫机器人运动轨迹规划研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(4): 191-200.
WU Liubo, LI Xinrong, DU Jinli. Research progress on trajectory planning of sewing robot based on contour extraction[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(4): 191-200.
[2] LÁZÁR K. Industrial robots in the textile and clothing industry[J]. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, 2024, 9(1): 1-9.
doi: 10.11648/j.ijimse
[3] KOUSTOUMPARDIS P N, ASPRAGATHOS N A. Intelligent hierarchical robot control for sewing fabrics[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2014, 30(1): 34-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2013.08.001
[4] 付天宇, 李凤鸣, 崔涛, 等. 基于视觉/力觉的机器人协同缝制系统[J]. 机器人, 2022, 44(3): 352-360.
doi: 10.13973/j.cnki.robot.210414
FU Tianyu, LI Fengming, CUI Tao, et al. A robotic collaborative sewing system based on visual and force perception[J]. Robot, 2022, 44(3): 352-360.
doi: 10.13973/j.cnki.robot.210414
[5] 王晓华, 王育合, 张蕾, 等. 缝纫机器人对织物张力与位置的模糊阻抗控制[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(11): 173-178.
doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20200605706
WANG Xiaohua, WANG Yuhe, ZHANG Lei, et al. Fuzzy impedance control of sewing robot for fabric tension and position[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(11): 173-178.
doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20200605706
[6] KOSAKA N, CHIDA Y, TANEMURA M, et al. Real-time optimal control of automatic sewing considering fabric geometric shapes[J]. Mechatronics, 2023, 94: 103005.
doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2023.103005
[7] LI F M, HOU D, FU T Y, et al. Research on robot sewing method based on process modeling[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 2024, 8(2): 401-421.
doi: 10.1007/s41315-024-00326-1
[8] TANG K, TOKUDA F, SEINO A, et al. Time-scaling modeling and control of robotic sewing system[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2024, 29(4): 3166-3174.
doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2024.3398713
[9] ZHU Y X, SHEN J Z, WANG J P, et al. A study on the formulation of process parameters for soft finger-assisted fabric stitching[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2024, 36(6): 1004-1019.
doi: 10.1108/IJCST-01-2024-0001
[10] WANG J P, SHEN J Z, YAO X F, et al. Research progress of automatic grasping methods for garment fabrics[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2023, 35(6): 997-1022.
doi: 10.1108/IJCST-05-2023-0068
[11] 王建萍, 朱妍西, 沈津竹, 等. 软体机器人在服装领域的应用进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(5): 239-247.
WANG Jianping, ZHU Yanxi, SHEN Jinzhu, et al. Application progress of soft robot in clothing field[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(5): 239-247.
[12] 王建萍, 沈津竹, 姚晓凤, 等. 服装裁片自动抓取技术及其布局方法的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(6): 227-234.
WANG Jianping, SHEN Jinzhu, YAO Xiaofeng, et al. Research progress on automatic grasping technology and layout method of garment cutting pieces[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(6): 227-234.
[13] SMOLA A J, SCHÖLKOPF B. A tutorial on support vector regression[J]. Statistics and Computing, 2004, 14(3): 199-222.
doi: 10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88
[14] DONG Z B, YANG D Z, REINDL T, et al. A novel hybrid approach based on self-organizing maps, support vector regression and particle swarm optimization to forecast solar irradiance[J]. Energy, 2015, 82: 570-577.
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.066
[15] YANG L, SHAMI A. On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: theory and practice[J]. Neurocomputing, 2020, 415: 295-316.
doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061
[1] 王建萍, 翁雨鑫, 沈津竹, 张帆, 刘霂珂. 基于软体手指的自动翻布装置及其应用效果[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(01): 197-205.
[2] 王建萍, 沈津竹, 姚晓凤, 朱妍西, 张帆. 服装裁片自动抓取技术及其布局方法的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(06): 227-234.
[3] 王晓华, 王育合, 张蕾, 王文杰. 缝纫机器人对织物张力与位置的模糊阻抗控制[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(11): 173-178.
[4] 谷有众 高卫东 卢雨正 刘建立 杨瑞华. 应用遗传算法优化支持向量回归机的喷气涡流纺纱线质量预测[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(07): 142-148.
[5] 尹丽敏 邓炳耀 刘庆生 唐继春. 热定型工艺对底网针刺造纸毛毯性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(03): 48-53.
[6] 田慧欣 贾玉凤. 基于集成多支持向量回归融合的上浆率在线软测量方法[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(1): 62-0.
[7] 杜兆芳, 黄芙蓉. 苎麻复合微生物脱胶工艺优化[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(5): 56-61.
[8] 余天石;郭欣欣;邱华;葛明桥. 利用废弃聚酯合成Gemini型表面活性剂[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(4): 20-24.
[9] 牟俊玲;邱华;葛明桥. 旋流器对环锭纺纱线性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(11): 43-47.
[10] 鞠成君;隆棣;俞建勇;薛文良. 平行股线纺纱气压的组合优选[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(05): 25-27.
[11] 白秀娥;管新海. PTT纤维碱处理工艺条件的优化[J]. 纺织学报, 2008, 29(5): 15-18.
[12] 伍建国;翦育林;汪朝光. 竹原纤维染色工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2008, 29(10): 70-72.
[13] 韩建;徐国平;袁利华. PLAP黄麻多层复合材料的工艺优化及力学性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2007, 28(11): 40-44.
[14] 李连举. 棉织物氧化一浴法前处理工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2005, 26(6): 109-111.
[15] 汪澜;曾军英;严峻. 丝/毛混纺织物的同色性染色技术[J]. 纺织学报, 2005, 26(6): 44-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!