纺织学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 66-72.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20200204407

• 纺织工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

腱骨修复用缝线在锚钉孔眼处的耐磨性能及其影响因素

张倩1,2, 毛吉富1,2,3, 吕璐瑶1,2, 徐仲棉4, 王璐1,2,3()   

  1. 1.东华大学 纺织学院, 上海 201620
    2.东华大学 纺织面料技术教育部重点实验室, 上海 201620
    3.东华大学 纺织行业生物医用纺织材料与技术重点实验室, 上海 201620
    4.浙江广慈医疗器械有限公司, 浙江 宁波 315000
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-24 修回日期:2020-07-17 出版日期:2020-12-15 发布日期:2020-12-23
  • 通讯作者: 王璐
  • 作者简介:张倩(1990—),女,硕士生。主要研究方向为生物医用纺织材料。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部创新引智基地111计划项目(B07024);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2232020G-01);宁波市科技重大科技专项(2017C110037);东华大学研究生创新基金资助项目(CUSF-DH-D-2019032);国家大学生创新项目(sh10255041)

Abrasion resistance of suture at anchor eyelet for tendon-bone repair and its influencing factors

ZHANG Qian1,2, MAO Jifu1,2,3, LÜ Luyao1,2, XU Zhongmian4, WANG Lu1,2,3()   

  1. 1. College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Textile Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Biomedical Textile Materials and Technology in Textile Industry, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
    4. Zhejiang Guangci Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China
  • Received:2020-02-24 Revised:2020-07-17 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-23
  • Contact: WANG Lu

摘要:

缝线在锚钉孔眼处磨损断裂是带线锚钉临床失效的主要原因,但由于缺乏测试装置,对缝线耐磨性的定量评价及影响因素尚不明晰。通过自主设计并搭建缝线摩擦性能测试装置,选取几种常用的缝线与锚钉,调节缝线拉伸角度(θSA)与锚钉旋转角度(θARA),对其断裂强力及耐磨性进行测试。结果表明:搭建的测试装置可为缝线耐磨性测试提供定量数据比较;聚对二氧环己酮由于其更高的断裂强力和单股结构,耐磨性最佳;锚钉孔眼表面的线槽设计会使缝线耐磨性降低,且线槽尺寸越大,对缝线耐磨性的损伤越大;与θSA为45°相比,θSA为0°时缝线表现出更好的耐磨性,对于无线槽锚钉,θARA为90°时缝线耐磨性更好,对于有线槽锚钉θARA为0°时缝线耐磨性更好。

关键词: 手术缝线, 锚钉, 摩擦性能测试装置, 耐磨性, 医用纺织品

Abstract:

Suture anchors often fail in service due to the abrasion and fracture of suture at the interface between suture and anchor eyelet in clinic. However, the quantitative evaluation of the abrasion resistance of suture is still unascertained owing to the absence of an measurement technique. A abrasion testing device was constructed, and several commonly used sutures and anchors were selected for this experiment. The breaking force and abrasion resistance of the sutures were analyzed by altering the suture-pull angle (θSA) and the anchor rotation angle (θARA). The results show that the abrasion device could provide quantitative comparisons for different sutures. The monofilament structure of poly (p-dioxanone) suture demonstrates the highest breaking strength and exhibits superior abrasion resistance. The groove on the anchor eyelet surface results in inferior abrasion resistance, and the larger the groove size, the higher the abrasion resistance. The suture shows lower abrasion resistance at θSA=0° compared with that at θSA=45°. For the anchor without groove, the suture displayed higher abrasion resistance at θARA=90°. In contrast, for the anchor with groove, the suture showed higher abrasion resistance at θARA=0°.

Key words: surgical suture, anchor, abrasion testing device, abrasion resistance, medical textiles

中图分类号: 

  • TS101.2

图1

实验材料形貌"

图2

缝线摩擦测试装置"

图3

缝线摩擦测试方法"

图4

3种缝线的拉伸曲线"

图5

3种缝线摩损后的断端形貌"

表1

线孔及角度对缝线断裂强力的影响"

实验参数/(°) 锚钉种类 断裂强力/N
θSA θARA
0 0 锚钉A 96.59±3.70
0 0 锚钉B 98.51±2.27
0 0 锚钉C 100.89±3.10
0 90 锚钉A 95.00±2.60
0 90 锚钉B 96.00±1.80
0 90 锚钉C 97.00±1.30
45 0 锚钉A 93.07±0.17
45 0 锚钉B 92.43±5.94
45 0 锚钉C 94.80±4.73
45 90 锚钉A 97.39±4.82
45 90 锚钉B 96.61±1.50
45 90 锚钉C 95.28±0.52

表2

线孔及角度对缝线耐磨性能的影响"

实验参数/(°) 锚钉种类 摩擦次数n
θSA θARA
0 0 锚钉A 2 213±221
0 0 锚钉B 2 006±102
0 0 锚钉C 1 476±23
0 90 锚钉A 2 726±208
0 90 锚钉B 526±78
0 90 锚钉C 389±51
45 0 锚钉A 1 101±203
45 0 锚钉B 1 011±59
45 0 锚钉C 902±52
45 90 锚钉A 1 336±373
45 90 锚钉B 469±23
45 90 锚钉C 96±7

图6

摩擦过程中缝线的摆动轨迹"

[1] VISSCHER L E, JEFFERY C, GILMOUR T, et al. The history of suture anchors in orthopaedic surgery[J]. Clinical Biomechanics, 2019,61:70-78.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.11.008 pmid: 30502638
[2] 徐海栋, 陈勇, 卢俊浩, 等. 带线锚钉材料在跟腱断裂修复中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2013,17(3):472-476.
XU Haidong, CHEN Yong, LU Junhao, et al. Application of fastin bone anchor material in the repair of achilles tendon rupture[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2013,17(3):472-476.
[3] 田勇, 马骁. 带线锚钉修复三角韧带损伤: 恢复踝关节稳定性[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015,19(22):3565-3570.
TIAN Yong, MA Xiao. Suture anchors for the repair of deltoid ligament injury: restore the stability of ankle joint[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2015,19(22):3565-3570.
[4] MEYER D C, NYFFELER R W, FUCENTESE S F, et al. Failure of suture material at suture anchor eye-lets[J]. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2002,18(9):1013-1019.
pmid: 12426545
[5] RUPP S, GEORG T, GAUSS C, et al. Fatigue testing of suture anchors[J]. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2002,30(2):239-247.
doi: 10.1177/03635465020300021601 pmid: 11912095
[6] KOWALSKY M S, DELLENBAUGH S G, ERLICHMAN D B, et al. Evaluation of suture abrasion against rotator cuff tendon and proximal humerus bone[J]. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2008,24(3):329-334.
pmid: 18308186
[7] BARDANA D D, BURKS R T, WEST J R, et al. The effect of suture anchor design and orientation on suture abrasion: an in vitro study[J]. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2003,19(3):274-281.
doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50032 pmid: 12627152
[8] DEAKIN M, STUBBS D, BRUCE W, et al. Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet[J]. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2005,21(12):1447-1451.
pmid: 16376233
[9] AKTAY S A, KOWALESKI M P. Analysis of suture anchor eyelet position on suture failure load[J]. Veterinary Surgery, 2011,40(4):418-422.
pmid: 21539579
[10] 王璐, 张倩, 王富军, 等. 一种骨科缝合线动态弯曲摩擦性能测试装置及方法: 201811034999.6[P]. 2019-02-22.
WANG Lu, ZHANG Qian, WANG Fujun, et al. A dynamic bending friction testing device and testing method for orthopedic suture: 201811034999.6[P]. 2019-02-22.
[11] 陈晓洁, 王璐, 侯丹丹, 等. 医用缝合线摩擦性能测试装置及测试方法: 201410028095.8[P]. 2016-08-17.
CHEN Xiaojie, WANG Lu, HOU Dandan, et al. Friction ttesting device and testing method for medical suture: 201410028095.8[P]. 2016-08-17.
[12] 焦亚男, 杨志, 张世浩. 实验参数对高性能石英纤维摩擦性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2019,40(7):38-43.
JIAO Ya'nan, YANG Zhi, ZHANG Shihao. Influence of experimental parameters on friction properties of high performance quartz fibers[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019,40(7):38-43.
[13] 邬淑芳, 张亭亭, HASAN Md Rokibul, 等. 涤纶网络丝仿麻织物的摩擦性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2019,40(10):134-140.
WU Shufang, ZHANG Tingting, HASAN Md Rokibul, et al. Improvement of friction performance of polyester interlacement yarn linen-like fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019,40(10):134-140.
[14] CHU C C. Materials for absorbable and nonabsorbable surgical sutures[M]//Biotextiles as Medical Impl-ants. England: Woodhead Publishing, 2013: 275-334.
[15] 赵帆. 双重可控式编织自增强型可降解血管支架的设计制备及构效关系[D]. 上海:东华大学, 2019: 32.
ZHAO Fan. Design and fabrication of dual controllable braided self-reinforced bioresorbable cardiovascular stent and its structure-function relationship analysis[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2019: 32.
[16] SAVAGE E, HURREN C J, SLADER S, et al. Bending and abrasion fatigue of common suture materials used in arthroscopic and open orthopedic surgery[J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2013,31(1):132-138.
doi: 10.1002/jor.22185 pmid: 22777625
[17] 刘晓艳, 徐鹏, 张华鹏, 等. 高性能纤维的弯曲疲劳断裂研究[J]. 合成纤维工业, 2003,26(6):11-14.
LIU Xiaoyan, XU Peng, ZHANG Huapeng, et al. Study on flex fatigue resistance of high-performance fiber[J]. China Synthetic Fiber Industry, 2003,26(6):11-14.
[18] 刘来俊, 张倩, 林婧, 等. 用于关节撕脱骨折手术的带线锚钉的结构和性能[J]. 生物医学工程学进展, 2017(4):215-219.
LIU Laijun, ZHANG Qian, LIN Jing, et al. Structures and properties of the suture anchor for the surgery of joint avulsion fracture[J]. Progress in Biomedical Engineering, 2017(4):215-219.
[19] GILES J T, COKER D, ROCHAT M C, et al. Biomechanical analysis of suture anchors and suture materials in the canine femur[J]. Veterinary Surgery, 2008,37(1):12-21.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00341.x pmid: 18199052
[1] 杨刚, 李海迪, 乔燕莎, 李彦, 王璐, 何红兵. 聚乳酸-己内酯/纤维蛋白原纳米纤维基补片的制备与表征[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 40-45.
[2] 杨宇晨, 覃小红, 俞建勇. 静电纺纳米纤维功能性纱线的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 1-9.
[3] 马沙沙, 王俊勃, 雒千, 思芳, 杨敏鸽, 陈宁波, 张小峰, 李博. 镍-磷-纳米碳化硅-聚四氟乙烯化学复合镀对纺纱钢丝圈寿命的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(12): 151-156.
[4] 刘明洁, 林婧, 关国平, BROCHU G, GUIDOIN R, 王璐. 典型纺织基人工韧带及其移出物结构与力学性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(11): 66-72.
[5] 段方燕, 王闻宇, 金欣, 牛家嵘, 林童, 朱正涛. 淀粉纤维的成形及其载药控释研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(10): 170-177.
[6] 乔燕莎, 王茜, 李彦, 桑佳雯, 王璐. 聚多巴胺涂层聚丙烯疝气补片的制备及其体外炎性反应[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(09): 162-166.
[7] 严佳, 李刚. 医用纺织品的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(09): 191-200.
[8] 戴鑫, 李晶, 陈晨. 镀铜碳纤维丝束细观耐磨性的有限元仿真模拟[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(06): 27-35.
[9] 张星, 刘金鑫, 张海峰, 王玉晓, 靳向煜. 防护口罩用非织造滤料的制备技术与研究现状[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(03): 168-174.
[10] 邬淑芳, 张亭亭, HASAN Md Rokibul, 陈益人. 涤纶网络丝仿麻织物的摩擦性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(10): 134-140.
[11] 杨小兵, 杨光, 谭雯莉, 郭婧雯, 丁松涛, 钟近艺. 化学防护服国际标准最新动态对我国GB 24539—2009修订的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(06): 165-170.
[12] 严燕钫 沈艳琴 武海良 张希文 姚一军. 玄武岩长丝表面低温等离子体处理及其浆丝集束性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(12): 24-29.
[13] 刘泽堃 李刚 李毓陵 李翼 王晓沁. 生物医用纺织人造血管的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(07): 155-163.
[14] 赵玉芬 李嘉禄 宋磊磊 姜茜 焦亚男. 上浆剂对国产碳化硅纤维表面及其织造性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(03): 78-84.
[15] 陈思 邱夷平 施楣梧 蒋秋冉. 用于天然纤维素纤维纱线的无浆料浆纱技术[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(2): 85-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!