Journal of Textile Research ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 102-110.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20250206601

• Textile Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Nival system for fabric pilling grade evaluation

DENG Yuntao1, TAN Yanjun1(), ZHANG Hongsong2, YAN Yu1, YU Qiuyu1, LIN Fengxi3, WANG Yixin4, AN Lele2   

  1. 1. College of Textile Science and Engineering, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710048, China
    2. Shanghai Ranzi Industrial Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200000, China
    3. Zhonglianpin Inspection (Fujian) Testing Service Co., Ltd.,Quanzhou, Fujian 362700, China
    4. Zhonglianpin Inspection (Wuhan) Testing Service Co., Ltd.,Wuhan, Hubei 430024, China
  • Received:2025-02-28 Revised:2025-08-03 Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-15
  • Contact: TAN Yanjun E-mail:448720091@qq.com

Abstract:

Objective Fabric pilling grading is a crucial aspect of fabric quality inspection. With the continuous increase in production levels within the textile industry, fabric pilling detection still relies on manual methods, which struggle to keep pace with production efficiency and are susceptible to subjective influences. Consequently, a portable fabric pilling grading evaluation system has been developed to address the demands of rapidly growing production efficiency for both efficiency and accuracy in the inspection process.
Method In this study, a detachable specimen clamp was designed and light angles were optimized, which collectively culminated in the development of a portable fabric acquisition device. The grading evaluation system employed an improved DA-Unet network model based on U-Net architecture to perform semantic segmentation on pilling areas of both knitted and woven fabrics made from cotton and polyester materials. Through correlation analysis, the characteristic parameters of fabric pilling are determined, and the final pilling grade evaluation module is constructed by using machine learning classification algorithm and numerical analysis of related characteristic parameters.
Results The system uses the DA-Unet network model to semantically segment the fabric image under different incident light angles, and compares the obtained semantic segmentation results with the results of pilling areas marked by professionals. Through the four evaluation indexes of intersection over union, pixel accuracy, recall and precision, the optimal incident light angle is determined to be 60°, and the results of the four evaluation indexes are 75.83%, 98.75%, 79.59% and 94.67%. The influence of characteristic parameters including pilling number, total pilling area, maximum pilling area, average pilling area, median pilling area and contrast, on pilling grade of fabrics was explored. The correlation between the characteristic parameters and the grade was analyzed by Spearman and Kendall methods, and the four characteristic parameters that had the greatest influence on the grade evaluation were determined as pilling number, total pilling area, maximum pilling area and median pilling area. Because of the differences in pilling characteristics between knitted and woven fabrics, six machine learning classification algorithms are used to predict the grade of four characteristic parameters of the two fabrics (combined with the grade evaluation results as input data). The results show that the random forest classification algorithm has the highest accuracy on knitted and woven fabrics, reaching 97.42% and 95.31% respectively. Because the special circumstances such as the appearance of hairballs in a large area have a great influence on the evaluation results, the related numerical range of different grade characteristic parameters is further analyzed, and the grade evaluation module is finally completed through the different grades divided by the parameter values. When analyzing the grades of 1 200 knitted and woven fabric samples, with discrepancies maintained within one grade compared to professional evaluations, the system achieved accuracy of 98.90% for knitted fabrics and 98.19% for woven fabrics, which effectively verified the accuracy of this system in fabric pilling grading.
Conclusion The system is used for assessing the pilling grades of knitted and woven fabrics made from cotton and polyester materials. Through four evaluation indexes, the angle of incident light is determined to be 60°. Through the Spearman and Kendall correlation analysis, four characteristic parameters which have the greatest influence on the grade evaluation are determined. Among the machine learning classification algorithms, the random forest classification algorithm has the highest rating accuracy for knitted and woven fabrics, reaching 97.42% and 95.31%. By analyzing the range of characteristic parameters of different grades, the grading accuracy of knitted and woven fabrics can reach 98.90% and 98.19%. The final results verify that the system has high accuracy in the evaluation of fabric pilling grade. Future research plans involve further expanding the types of fabrics to include nonwoven fabrics. Additionally, other methods will be explored in the grading evaluation module to further enhance the accuracy of the evaluation results.

Key words: fabric pilling, pilling grading, neural network, correlation analysis, pilling characteristic parameter, machine learning classification algorithm

CLC Number: 

  • TS194.179

Fig.1

Experimental flow chart"

Fig.2

Physical diagram of acquisition device"

Fig.3

Loss function diagrams of different model training processes"

Fig.4

Results of different fabric types. (a) Knitted cotton fabric; (b) Knitted polyester fabric;(c) Woven cotton fabric; (d) Woven polyester fabric"

Tab.1

Results of four evaluation indicators at different light incident angles"

角度/(°) 交并比/% 像素准确率/% 召回率/% 精确度/%
40 38.22 98.25 55.73 54.10
50 61.73 98.63 70.74 82.84
60 75.83 98.75 79.59 94.67
70 46.39 98.52 46.92 61.82
80 41.50 98.61 40.36 62.95

Tab.2

Correlation coefficients between six characteristic parameters and grades"

特征参数 Spearman相关性
系数
Kendall相关性
系数
起毛起球个数 -0.933 7 -0.823 9
起毛起球总面积 -0.961 9 -0.860 5
起毛起球最大面积 -0.937 4 -0.825 8
起毛起球平均面积 -0.920 7 -0.804 6
起毛起球面积中位数 -0.934 6 -0.820 7
对比度 -0.294 6 -0.240 9

Fig.5

Different level standard sample photo of pilling of knitted fabric.(a)Level 1; (b)Level 2; (c)Level 2-3; (d)Level 3; (e)Level 3-4; (f)Level 4; (g)Level 5"

Tab.3

Grading accuracy of knitted fabrics and woven fabrics under six kinds of machine learning algorithms"

机器学习分类算法 针织物准确率/% 机织物准确率/%
高斯贝叶斯算法 97.00 94.53
逻辑回归算法 59.23 65.63
决策树分类算法 95.28 93.75
随机森林分类算法 97.42 95.31
支持向量机算法 94.85 89.06
K最近邻算法 95.71 94.53

Fig.6

Images of special fabric pilling cases. (a) Uniformly adhered pilling; (b) Regionally clustered pilling;(c) Continuous linear pilling"

Fig.7

Numerical range of different characteristic parameters of knitted fabric.(a) Box diagram of pilling number;(b) Box diagram of total pilling area; (c) Box diagram of maximum pilling area;(d) Box diagram of median pilling area"

Tab.4

Range of pilling parameters of knitted fabrics with different grades"

等级/级 起毛起球个数范围/个 起毛起球总面积范围/像素 起毛起球最大面积范围/像素 起毛起球面积中位数范围/像素
1 ≥284 ≥1 172 046 ≥39 997 ≥2 742
1-2 [246.5,284) [705 920.5,1 172 046) [22 592.5,39 997) [2 066.5,2 742)
2 [198,246.5) [397 322,705 920.5) [11 556.5,22 592.5) [1 419,2 066.5)
2-3 [159,198) [188 536,397 322) [6 919,11 556.5) [1 076,1 419)
3 [115,159) [128 214,188 536) [4 273,6 919) [798,1 076)
3-4 [80,115) [65 275,128 214) [3 424,4 273) [665,798)
4 [42,80) [30 356,65 275) [2 076,3 424) [453,665)
4-5 [18,42) [814,30 356) [878,2 076) [317,453)
5 <18 <814 <878 <317

Tab.5

Range of pilling parameters of woven fabrics with different grades"

等级/级 起毛起球个数范围/个 起毛起球总面积范围/像素 起毛起球最大面积范围/像素 起毛起球面积中位数范围/像素
1 ≥187 ≥415 275 ≥10 781 ≥1 537
1-2 [247 839,415 275) [7 936,10 781) [1 359,1 537)
2 [131,187) [177 757,247 839) [5 400,7 936) [981,1 359)
2-3 [93,131) [84 363,177 757) [4 643,5 400) [909,981)
3 [60,93) [50 088,84 363) [2 975,4 643) [600,909)
3-4 [38,60) [20 575,50 088) [2 054,2 975) [546,600)
4 [24,38) [11 116,20 575) [1 334,2 054) [291,546)
4-5 [11,24) [3 848,11 116) [803,1 334)
5 <11 <3 848 <803 <291
[1] 卢开新, 管雯珺. 织物起毛起球检测技术发展现状及展望[J]. 纺织科技进展, 2020(3): 20-23.
LU Kaixin, GUAN Wenjun. Development status and prospect of fabric pilling detection technology[J]. Progress in Textile Science & Technology, 2020(3): 20-23.
[2] 王惠. 纺织品起毛起球性能测定方法对比分析[J]. 化纤与纺织技术, 2021, 50(7): 74-75, 148.
WANG Hui. Comparative analysis of testing methods for pilling properties of textiles[J]. Chemical Fiber & Textile Technology, 2021, 50(7): 74-75, 148.
[3] 董康乐, 陈姗, 安少元, 等. 基于图像处理的织物起毛起球分级研究[J]. 纺织器材, 2019, 46(6): 15-19.
DONG Kangle, CHEN Shan, AN Shaoyuan, et al. Study on fabric pilling classification based on image processing[J]. Textile Accessories, 2019, 46(6): 15-19.
[4] 蔡林莉, 黄志威, 叶春收, 等. 基于图像处理的粗梳毛织物起毛起球等级客观评定[J]. 毛纺科技, 2013, 41(2): 58-61.
CAI Linli, HUANG Zhiwei, YE Chunshou, et al. Research on objective evaluation of fabric spray test based on image processing[J]. Wool Textile Journal, 2013, 41(2): 58-61.
[5] LIU L L, DENG N, XIN B J, et al. Objective evaluation of fabric pilling based on multi-view stereo vision[J]. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 2021, 112(12): 1986-1997.
doi: 10.1080/00405000.2020.1862479
[6] 汪亚明, 崔新辉, 韩永华. 基于小波变换及Gabor滤波的起毛起球图像分割[J]. 丝绸, 2016, 53(3): 37-40.
WANG Yaming, CUI Xinhui, HAN Yonghua. Fabric pilling image segmentation based on wavelet transform and Gabor filter[J]. Journal of Silk, 2016, 53(3): 37-40.
[7] CHEN H Q, HAN Y H, LI J G, et al. An objective fabric pilling evaluation based on wavelet transform and Gabor filter[J]. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2022, 17: 15589250221108728.
[8] WU J, LIU Q W, XIAO Z T, et al. Objective rating method for fabric pilling based on LSNet network[J]. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 2024, 115(4): 535-543.
doi: 10.1080/00405000.2023.2201531
[9] XIAO Q, WANG R, ZHANG S J, et al. Prediction of pilling of polyester-cotton blended woven fabric using artificial neural network models[J]. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2020, 15: 1558925019900152.
[10] TECHNIKOVÁ L, TUNÁK M, JANÁ EK J. New objective system of pilling evaluation for various types of fabrics[J]. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 2017, 108(1): 123-131.
doi: 10.1080/00405000.2016.1160476
[11] 孙杰, 李伟松, 沈锦玉, 等. 基于仪器评级的织物起毛起球性能客观评价方法探讨[J]. 天津纺织科技, 2016(4): 38-39.
SUN Jie, LI Weisong, SHEN Jinyu, et al. Discussion on objective evaluation method of fabric pilling performance based on instrument rating[J]. Tianjin Textile Science & Technology, 2016(4): 38-39.
[12] YAN Y, TAN Y J, GAO P F, et al. Fabric pilling image segmentation by embedding dual-attention mechanism U-Net network[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2024, 94(21/22): 2434-2444.
doi: 10.1177/00405175241246735
[13] XIONG Y, YUAN L, GU Q, et al. Correlation analysis between fabric structure and color rendering of polyester colored spun woven fabric based on the improved relative discrimination criterion[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2022, 92(13/14): 2433-2445.
doi: 10.1177/00405175221079654
[14] LI B Y, TIAN M, LIU X H, et al. Predicting the thermal protective performance of flame-retardant fabric based on machine learning[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2024, 36(2): 226-240.
doi: 10.1108/IJCST-12-2022-0175
[15] 刘燕萍, 郭佩瑶, 吴莹. 面向织物疵点检测的深度学习技术应用研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(12): 234-242.
doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20240102302
LIU Yanping, GUO Peiyao, WU Ying. Research progress in deep learning technology for fabric defect detection[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(12): 234-242.
doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20240102302
[16] 王小东, 陈俊鹏, 裴泽光. 基于U-Net卷积神经网络的织物压力传感阵列串扰解决方法[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(7): 86-93.
WANG Xiaodong, CHEN Junpeng, PEI Zeguang. Method for solving crosstalk in fabric pressure sensor array based on U-Net convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(7): 86-93.
doi: 10.1177/004051757504500117
[17] 陆寅雯, 侯珏, 杨阳, 等. 基于姿态嵌入机制和多尺度注意力的单张着装图像视频合成[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(7): 165-172.
LU Yinwen, HOU Jue, YANG Yang, et al. Single dress image video synthesis based on pose embedding and multi-scale attention[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(7): 165-172.
[18] 孙长敏, 戴宁, 沈春娅, 等. 基于K-近邻算法改进粒子群-反向传播算法的织物质量预测技术[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(7): 72-77.
SUN Changmin, DAI Ning, SHEN Chunya, et al. Fabric quality prediction technology based on K-nearest neighbor algorithm improved particle swarm optimization-back propagation algorithm[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(7): 72-77.
[1] ZHU Yaolin, LI Zheng, ZHANG Qiang, CHEN Xin, CHEN Jinni, ZHANG Hongsong. Quantitative detection of wool and cashmere based on near infrared spectroscopy and multi-feature network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(09): 104-111.
[2] ZHENG Xiaohu, DU Siqi, LIU Yongqing, WANG Jian, CHEN Feng. Cotton yarn quality prediction based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(09): 120-127.
[3] ZHANG Xiaoting, ZHAO Pengyu, PAN Ruru, GAO Weidong. Plaid fabric image retrieval method based on deep feature fusion [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(08): 89-95.
[4] GU Mengshang, ZHANG Ning, PAN Ruru, GAO Weidong. Object detection of weaving fabric defects using frequency-domain convolution modules [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(05): 159-168.
[5] LIANG Jinxing, LI Dongsheng, LI Yifan, ZHOU Jing, LUO Hang, CHEN Jia, HU Xinrong. Color fastness grading of textiles based on color measurement of digital images [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(04): 119-128.
[6] WANG Luojun, PENG Laihu, XIONG Xuyi, LI Yang, HU Xudong. Hyper basis function-based adaptive inverse non-singular method for constant-tension yarn transport [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(02): 92-99.
[7] SHENG Xibin, ZHAO Songling, GU Bingfei. Production scheduling optimization of shirt component module based on standard man-hour prediction [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(01): 154-162.
[8] LIU Jian, WANG Chenghao, DONG Shoujun, LIU Yongru. Design and optimization of semi-enclosed free-surface electrospinning nozzle [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(11): 215-225.
[9] SUN Changmin, DAI Ning, SHEN Chunya, XU Kaixin, CHEN Wei, HU Xudong, YUAN Yanhong, CHEN Zuhong. Fabric quality prediction technology based on K-nearest neighbor algorithm improved particle swarm optimization-back propagation algorithm [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(07): 72-77.
[10] WANG Xiaodong, CHEN Junpeng, PEI Zeguang. Method for solving crosstalk in fabric pressure sensor array based on U-Net convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(07): 86-93.
[11] HU Xudong, TANG Wei, ZENG Zhifa, RU Xin, PENG Laihu, LI Jianqiang, WANG Boping. Structure classification of weft-knitted fabric based on lightweight convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(05): 60-69.
[12] QI Yubao, RU Xin, LI Jianqiang, ZHOU Yuexin, PENG Laihu. Gradual failure detection of piezoelectric needle selector based on stochastic resonance-BP algorithm [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(03): 202-208.
[13] GE Sumin, LIN Ruibing, XU Pinghua, WU Siyi, LUO Qianqian. Personalized customization of curved surface pillows based on machine vision [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(02): 214-220.
[14] LEI Junjie, SHEN Chunya, HU Xudong, RU Xin, PENG Laihu. Large-scale scheduling of weaving workshop based on NSGAII and neural network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(11): 208-215.
[15] LIU Rong, XIE Hong. Similarity pattern matching technology based on garment structural feature recognition [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(10): 134-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!