Journal of Textile Research ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (06): 79-85.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20251004301

• Textile Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Modeling and simulation of surface adhesion behavior on cotton fiber surfaces

JIANG Chaopeng1, LI Yong2, CHEN Xiaochuan1(), WANG Jun3   

  1. 1 College of Mechanical EngineeringDonghua UniversityShanghai 201620, China
    2 College of Mechanical and Electronic EngineeringTarim University, AlarXinjiang 843300, China
    3 College of TextilesDonghua UniversityShanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2025-10-21 Revised:2026-04-03 Online:2026-06-15 Published:2026-08-19
  • Contact: CHEN Xiaochuan E-mail:xcchen@dhu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Objective To further understand the surface adhesion mechanism between cotton fibers in needle-punched nonwoven fabrics, this study aims to establish a reliable finite element model capable of quantifying interfacial adhesion forces at microscale, and to reveal how surface roughness modulates adhesion behavior through a "shielding effect" that cannot be captured by classical contact mechanics theories alone.

Method A 2-D axisymmetric finite element model with a "cellulose sphere-cellulose film" contact configuration was built in Abaqus to simulate the pull-off process. A bilinear cohesive traction-separation relation was used to captured interfacial damage evolution. The sphere was modeled as a Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic solid (E = 12 MPa, ν = 0.3), and film surface roughness (RMS = 0.15 μm) was introduced based on AFM measurements. Cohesive parameters were calibrated against colloidal-probe AFM data. Six sphere radius (R=3.30-16.54 μm) were tested, each repeated five times under randomized roughness.

Results The simulation results showed strong agreement with experimental data across all tested radius, with a maximum relative deviation of 14.88%. The adhesion force exhibited a clear non-monotonic dependence on sphere radius. In the range of 3.3 μm-13.18 μm, adhesion increased monotonically from 0.157 15 μN to 0.659 39 μN, consistent with the JKR prediction that adhesion force scales with contact area. The sphere at R=13.18 μm produced the highest adhesion force of 0.659 39 μN (simulated) versus 0.576 61 μN (experimental). However, when the radius exceeded 14.35 μm, adhesion dropped markedly to 0.416 83 μN (R = 14.35μm) and 0.505 82 μN (R = 16.54 μm). This phenomenon can be attributed to the presence of microscale rough structures on the membrane surface. Stress field visualization revealed that large spheres made contact predominantly with surface asperities rather than penetrating into surface valleys, substantially reducing the effective contact area. This mechanism-termed the "shielding effect" of surface roughness-explains the observed adhesion reduction that the micro-scale topography of the rough cellulose film prevents large spheres from achieving conformal contact, thereby weakening van der Waals interactions. The full loading-unloading-pull-off sequence was successfully reproduced by the cohesive model, capturing interface damage initiation and progressive softening up to complete separation.

Conclusion This study demonstrates that a bilinear cohesive zone finite element model, combined with explicit surface roughness representation, can accurately reproduce the adhesion behavior between cellulose fiber surfaces with deviations below 15%. The results confirm that adhesion between cellulose microspheres and films follows JKR scaling at moderate radius but is governed by roughness-induced contact shielding at larger radius. The identified "shielding effect" provides a quantitative micro-mechanical explanation for the radius-dependent non-monotonic adhesion behavior observed experimentally. The proposed modeling framework offers a practical tool for quantitative analysis and optimization of fiber-fiber bonding in needle-punched cotton nonwovens, with potential applicability to broader cellulose-based fibrous systems.

Key words: needle-punched nonwoven fabric, cotton fiber, surface adhesion, cohesive zone model, finite element simulation

CLC Number: 

  • TS101

Fig.1

2-D axisymmetric FE model and mesh. (a)Axisymmetric model; (b)Final FE mesh model"

Tab.1

Adhesion force convergence results at different mesh densities"

网格类型 最大拉脱力/
μN
与上一级网格
相对差值/%
粗网格 0.662
中网格 0.657 0.75
细网格 0.642 2.30

Fig.2

Lower surface model with roughness"

Fig.3

Comparison of hyperelastic and linear materials under uniaxial(a) and biaxial(b) loading"

Fig.4

Traction separation bilinear model"

Fig.5

Example of cohesive law with similar fracture energy and damageinitiation tractions but different softening behaviours"

Tab.2

Contact parameters in simulation model"

参数 数值
Kn/(MPa·mm-1 8×106
Ks/(MPa·mm-1 8×106
${\mathit{t}}_{\mathit{n}}^{0}$/MPa 1×103
${\mathit{t}}_{\mathit{s}}^{0}$/MPa 6.0
${\mathit{\delta }}_{\mathit{f}}$/mm 1×10-4
Gc/(N·mm-1 0.27

Fig.6

Analysis steps with boundary conditions. (a)Compaction;(b)Unloading ;(c)Pull-off"

Fig.7

System diagram of AFM method for adhesion measurement"

Fig.8

Schematic diagram of force-distance curve of interaction between cellulose surfaces"

Fig.9

Simulation results of adhesion force changing with time at different radius"

Fig.10

Simulated adhesion force versus sphere radius"

Tab.3

Comparison of simulated and experimental adhesion force values under different radius"

纤维素球半径/μm 仿真力值/μN 实验力值/μN 相对误差/%
3.30 0.157 15 0.136 79 14.88
5.30 0.205 24 0.184 78 11.07
7.48 0.406 72 0.365 11 11.40
13.18 0.659 39 0.576 61 14.36
14.35 0.416 83 0.365 93 13.91
16.54 0.505 82 0.457 72 10.51

Fig.11

Schematic diagram of incomplete contact between cellulose sphere and lower substrate"

[1] 王世豪, 徐晓禹, 郑挺, 等. 碳纤维非织造材料的研究应用及展望[J]. 纺织学报, 2026, 47(1): 240-249.
WANG Shihao, XU Xiaoyu, ZHENG Ting, et al. Research applications and prospect of carbon fiber nonwovens[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2026, 47(1): 240-249.
[2] 邓黎黎, 徐剑. 针刺非织造革基布结构与性能的影响因素研究[J]. 河南工程学院学报(自然科学版), 2025, 37(2): 12-15, 20.
DENG Lili, XU Jian. Study on the influencing factors on the structure and properties of needle punched non-woven synthetic leather substrate[J]. Journal of Henan Institute of Engineering (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 37(2): 12-15, 20.
[3] GENG J Y, ZHANG H, MENG X H, et al. Usage of colloidal AFM probe for research in effects of water layer evaporation on interfacial adhesion between cellulose surfaces[C]//2022 12th International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER). New York: IEEE, 2022: 1323-1328.
[4] HIRN U, SCHENNACH R. Fiber-fiber bond formation and failure: mechanisms and analytical techni-ques[C]//Trans. of the XVIth Fund. Res. Symp. Oxford, 2017. Fundamental Research Committee (FRC), Manchester, 2017: 839-863.
[5] HUANG F, LI K C, KULACHENKO A. Measurement of interfiber friction force for pulp fibers by atomic force microscopy[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2009, 44(14): 3770-3776.
[6] 张威, 苏玉, 刘芳慧, 等. 利用胶体探针技术研究多巴与纳米、微米及微纳复合结构表面之间的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1644-1654.
ZHANG Wei, SU Yu, LIU Fanghui, et al. Study of interactions between 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and surfaces with nano-, micro-and hierarchical structures using colloidal probe technology[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2017, 33(8): 1644-1654.
[7] LAI Y L, ZHANG H, SUGANO Y, et al. Correlation of surface morphology and interfacial adhesive behavior between cellulose surfaces: quantitative measurements in peak-force mode with the colloidal probe technique[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(22): 7312-7321.
[8] 邱俊, 李际军. 机织物的三维真实感建模与参数化设计[J]. 纺织学报, 2025, 46(10): 95-102.
QIU Jun, LI Jijun. 3-D realistic modeling and parametric design of woven fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(10): 95-102.
[9] 万小东, 孙其勋, 刘健犇, 等. 基于界面相互作用的黏附接触数学模型研究进展[J]. 表面技术, 2024, 53(1): 33-47, 77.
WAN Xiaodong, SUN Qixun, LIU Jianben, et al. Research progress on mathematical model of adhesive contact based on interface interaction[J]. Surface Technology, 2024, 53(1): 33-47, 77.
[10] 朱玉东, 郑志军. 圆柱弹性吸附接触Maugis模型的改进和检验[J]. 科学通报, 2025, 70(22): 3735-3743.
ZHU Yudong, ZHENG Zhijun. Modification and verification of the Maugis model for elastic cylinder adhesive contact[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2025, 70(22): 3735-3743.
[11] WU F, LI C. Theory of adhesive contact on multi-ferroic composite materials: conical indenter[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2021, 233: 111217.
[12] YANG T H, LIECHTI K M, HUANG R. A multiscale cohesive zone model for rate-dependent fracture of interfaces[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2020, 145: 104142.
[13] KAPLAN M, ÖSTLUND S. A numerical model for understanding the development of adhesion during drying of cellulose model surfaces[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(4): 1327.
[14] LI H L, MYSTEK K, WÅGBERG L, et al. Development of mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose beads during drying as investigated by atomic force microscopy[J]. Soft Matter, 2020, 16(28): 6457-6462.
[15] MOONEY M. A theory of large elastic deformation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1940, 11(9): 582-592.
[16] RIVLIN R S. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV. further developments of the general theory[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948, 241(835): 379-397.
[17] SPRING D W, PAULINO G H. A growing library of three-dimensional cohesive elements for use in ABAQUS[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 126: 190-216.
[1] XI Lifeng, ZHANG Aijun, JIA Wei, MA Pibo, JIANG Gaoming. Model construction and knitting damage mechanism of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation membrane fabrics [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2026, 47(02): 162-171.
[2] LI Xintian, ZHOU Xuan, WANG Zhanhuan, DU Zhonghua, XU Lizhi. Influence of layer number and layup mode on anti-penetration performance of multi-layer aramid plain woven fabric [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(11): 126-136.
[3] DU Yuhang, HOU Dongyu, QI Pengfei. Design and optimization of power supply for smart clothing based on triboelectric nanogenerator principles [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(11): 211-220.
[4] JIN Shaote, YAN Kelu, HUANG Jinjie, CHEN Defang, SHI Xiangyang. Continuous dyeing technology for loose cotton fibers with reactive dyes and its industrial application [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(10): 129-134.
[5] LIU Jingyu, SHI Sheng, HU Xiaorui, LI Xiaoyan, ZHANG Meiling, GAO Chengyong, WANG Hua. Review on dissolution systems for cellulose and recycling and regeneration of waste cotton fiber [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(07): 236-243.
[6] HAN Zhihui, WAN Ailan, HONG Liang, GAO Lizhong, XIA Fenglin. Damage analysis and finite element simulation of wool yarn in warping [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(07): 103-110.
[7] CHU Xiangting, GAO Jian, ZHANG Hongdou, LU Huiwen, LIU Xinjin, SU Xuzhong. Study on fiber hooking in cotton fiber assembly based on fiber mass distribution method [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(07): 69-77.
[8] JIA Lu, ZHOU Suqin, GUO Longcan, LIU Shuqiang, ZHANG Yu. Preparation of MXene-coated cotton/spandex conductive core yarn and its sensing properties [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(07): 96-102.
[9] QIN Jianfeng, SHI Shuwei, MENG Yongfa, LI Menghui, XIA Bin. Influence of seed cotton humidification before ginning on cotton processing quality of machine harvested upland cotton in northern Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(06): 96-102.
[10] CHEN Xinwei, GU Bingfei, TIAN Jiali, ZHOU Sifan, LIU Yuxi, LIU Jinling, YICK Kit-lun, SUN Yue. Optimization design method for sports bra using CAD/CAE technology [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(04): 162-170.
[11] SHAO Qiu, YANG Ruihua. Abrasion resistance of recycled cotton/raw cotton rotor spun yarn [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2025, 46(03): 64-71.
[12] WANG Bo, JIANG Zhiqing, BAO Junfang, LIU Jinwei. Research progress in geographic origin traceability technology for cotton fibers [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(11): 244-250.
[13] ZHU Lei, LI Yong, CHEN Xiaochuan, WANG Jun. Finite element modeling and simulation of cotton fiber assembly carding process based on 3-D braided and fractal theory [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(11): 65-72.
[14] TAO Jing, WANG Junliang, ZHANG Jie. Data-driven finite element simulation for yarn breaking strength analysis [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(02): 238-245.
[15] MA Chengnuo, JIANG Kaixiang, CHEN Chunhui, LIU Yuanling, ZHANG Youqiang. Analysis on mechanical properties and fracture morphology of Xinjiang long-staple cotton fiber [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(02): 36-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!