纺织学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 107-114.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20200810608

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉织物的3-氨丙基三乙氧基硅烷阻燃整理

刘淑萍1,2,3, 李亮1,2,3, 刘让同1,2,3(), 胡泽栋1,2,3, 耿长军1,2,3   

  1. 1.中原工学院, 河南 郑州 450007
    2.纺织服装产业河南省协同创新中心, 河南 郑州 450007
    3.河南省功能纺织材料重点实验室, 河南 郑州 450007
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-31 修回日期:2021-07-12 出版日期:2021-10-15 发布日期:2021-10-29
  • 通讯作者: 刘让同
  • 作者简介:刘淑萍(1978—),女,讲师,博士。主要研究方向为纺织新材料、高分子材料的研究与开发。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0309100);河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划(19HASTIT024)

Flame retardant finishing of cotton fabric with tri-aminopropyl triethoxysilane

LIU Shuping1,2,3, LI Liang1,2,3, LIU Rangtong1,2,3(), HU Zedong1,2,3, GENG Changjun1,2,3   

  1. 1. Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
    2. Henan Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of Textile and Clothing, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
    3. Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Functional Textile Materials, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
  • Received:2020-08-31 Revised:2021-07-12 Published:2021-10-15 Online:2021-10-29
  • Contact: LIU Rangtong

摘要:

为赋予棉织物阻燃性及阻燃耐水洗性,以3-氨丙基三乙氧基硅烷(APTES)、 聚磷酸铵和壳聚糖为阻燃剂采用层层自组装的方法对其进行阻燃整理,研究了APTES质量分数对织物的阻燃性、耐水洗性、舒适性和物理力学性能的影响。结果表明:随着APTES质量分数的增加,整理织物的燃烧放热行为逐渐缓解,极限氧指数逐渐增加,透气性、白度和断裂强力都有所降低;当APTES质量分数为13%时,垂直燃烧的续燃时间和阴燃时间分别从未整理的8.15 s和20.32 s降至了5.23 s和2.21 s,残炭量从5.6%增至14.7%;水洗后整理织物的阻燃性能有所下降,但仍优于未整理的棉织物。

关键词: 阻燃整理, 层层自组装, 3-氨丙基三乙氧基硅烷, 棉织物, 聚磷酸铵, 壳聚糖

Abstract:

In order to endow cotton fabrics with flame resistance and washability, the flame retardant finishing using tri-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES), ammonium polyphosphate and chitosan was carried out by self-assembly method. The effects of APTES mass fraction on the flame resistance, washability, comfort, physical and mechanical properties of cotton fabrics were analyzed.These results indicate that, with APTES mass fraction increasing,the heat release behavior of finished fabrics gradually eases during the combustion process and the limiting oxygen index increases.When the APTES mass fraction is 13%, the after flame time and afterg low time of vertical combustion reduce to 5.23 s and 2.21 s from 8.15 s and 20.32 s of untreated fabric, respectively. Meanwhile, the residual carbon amount increases to 14.7% from 5.6% of untreated fabric. Although the flame retardant property of cotton fabric decreases after washing treatment, it is still better than that of the untreated fabric.

Key words: flame retardant finishing, layer-by-layer self-assembly, tri-aminopropyl triethoxysilane, cotton fabric, ammonium polyphosphate, chitosan

中图分类号: 

  • TS102.3

图1

APTES质量分数对织物质量增加率的影响"

图2

不同APTES质量分数整理织物的红外吸收光谱图"

图3

不同APTES质量分数整理织物的热释放速率曲线"

表1

织物燃烧放热及热稳定性参数"

APTES质
量分数/%
HRC/
(J·(g·K ) - 1)
PHRR/
(W· g - 1)
THR/
(kJ· g - 1)
Tmax/
残炭
量/%
0 234 217 12.2 382.1 5.6
2 288 260 12.1 379.9 10.3
8 259 300 12.8 377.6 12.4
13 229 304 12.5 357.8 14.7

表2

织物水洗前垂直燃烧参数和LOI值"

APTES质量分数/% 续燃时间/s 阴燃时间/s LOI值/%
0 8.15 20.32 18.0
2 6.95 8.26 19.0
5 6.45 8.05 20.0
8 6.43 7.48 20.0
10 6.23 5.14 21.0
13 5.23 2.21 21.0

图4

不同APTES质量分数整理织物垂直燃烧后的残炭照片"

表3

织物水洗后垂直燃烧参数和LOI值"

APTES质量分数/% 续燃时间/s 阴燃时间/s LOI值/%
0 8.15 20.32 18.0
2 7.06 10.27 19.2
5 6.92 9.85 19.0
8 6.81 8.31 19.0
10 6.56 7.56 19.2
13 6.50 6.63 19.5

图5

不同整理织物垂直燃烧后残炭电镜照片(×20 000)"

图6

不同APTES质量分数整理织物的接触角和透气率曲线"

表4

APTES质量分数对织物白度和断裂强力的影响"

APTES质量分数/
%
白度/
%
断裂强力/N
经向 纬向
0 77.4 364.4 335.6
2 65.7 357.4 326.8
5 62.9 358.5 327.1
8 60.6 359.7 327.9
10 57.8 361.1 329.4
13 55.2 361.9 332.5
[1] YU J, PATERSON N, MILLAN M. The primary products of cellulose pyrolysis in the absence of extraparticle reactions[J]. Fuel, 2019, 237:911-915.
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.059
[2] 朱平, 隋淑英, 王炳. 阻燃及未阻燃棉织物的热裂解[J]. 纺织学报, 2002, 23(6):34-36.
ZHU Ping, SUI Shuying, WANG Bing. Study of pyrolysis process and products of flame-retardant cotton fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2002, 23(6):34-36.
doi: 10.1177/004051755302300105
[3] 李忠芳. 层层自组装阻燃棉织物的制备及性能[D]. 武汉:武汉纺织大学, 2017: 3-8.
LI Zhongfang. The preparation and properties of flame-retardant cotton fabric by layer-by-layer assembly[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan Textile University, 2017: 3-8.
[4] 赵晓明, 刘元军, 拓晓. 阻燃机理及纺织品阻燃整理剂的应用与发展趋势[J]. 成都纺织高等专科学校学报, 2015, 32(3):47-50.
ZHAO Xiaoming, LIU Yuanjun, TUO Xiao. Flame retardant mechanism and application and development trend of flame retardant finishing agents for textiles[J]. Journal of Chengdu Textile College, 2015, 32(3):47-50.
[5] 刘津玮, 张宪胜. 阻燃纤维及纤维间阻燃协同效应研究进展[J]. 产业用纺织品, 2019, 37(2):1-7,19.
LIU Jinwei, ZHANG Xiansheng. Research developments of fire retardant fibers and fire retardant synergy effects among fibers[J]. Technical Textiles, 2019, 37(2):1-7,19.
[6] 张海霞, 张喜昌. 阻燃纤维与棉混纺针织物的性能分析[J]. 河南工程学院学报(自然科学版), 2017, 29(2):1-4.
ZHANG Haixia, ZHANG Xichang. Property analysis of flame-retardant fiber/cotton blended knitted fabrics[J]. Journal of Henan University of Engineering(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 29(2):1-4.
[7] 启萌. 微胶囊在纺织品中的应用[J]. 纺织装饰科技, 2018(2):24-26.
QI Meng. Application of micro-encapsulation in tex-tiles[J]. Textile Decorate Science and Technology, 2018(2):24-26.
[8] 周青青, 陈嘉毅, 祁珍明, 等. 阻燃抗菌棉织物的制备及其性能表征[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(5) : 112-120.
ZHOU Qingqing, CHEN Jiayi, QI Zhenming, et al. Preparation and characterization of flame retardant andantibacterial cotton fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(5):112-120.
[9] NGUYEN M M, SAMEER A A W, FONTENOT K R, et al. Understanding the mechanism of action of triazine-phosphonate derivatives as flame retardants for cotton fabric[J]. Molecules, 2015, 20(6):11236-11256.
doi: 10.3390/molecules200611236
[10] 马亚男, 沈军炎, 骆晓蕾, 等. 高效无卤阻燃棉织物的制备及其结构与性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(3):122-129.
MA Yanan, SHEN Junyan, LUO Xiaolei, et al. Preparation and properties of high efficiency halogen-freeflame-retardant cotton fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(3):122-129.
doi: 10.1177/004051757204200209
[11] WAN C Y, LIU M S, HE P P, et al. A novel reactive flame retardant for cotton fabric based on a thiourea-phosphoric acid polymer[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2020, 154:112625-112634.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112625
[12] 涂志丹, 朱亚伟. 棉织物紫外固化阻燃整理工艺[J]. 印染, 2018, 44(16):33-37.
TU Zhidan, ZHU Yawei. Flame retardant finish of cotton fabric by UV curing[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2018, 44(16):33-37.
[13] CHENG X W, TANG R C, GUAN J P, et al. An eco-friendly and effective flame retardant coating for cotton fabric based on phytic acid doped silica sol app-roach[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2020, 141:105539-105547.
doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105539
[14] 程浩南. 基于ATRP接枝DMMEP的棉织物阻燃整理[J]. 印染, 2018, 44(16):10-13,18.
CHENG Haonan. Flame retardant finishing of cotton fabric grafted by DMMEP with ATRP method[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2018, 44(16):10-13,18.
[15] 曾凡鑫, 秦宗益, 沈玥莹, 等. 自熄性棉织物的喷涂辅助层层自组装法制备及其阻燃性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(6):103-111.
ZENG Fanxin, QIN Zongyi, SHEN Yueying, et al. Preparation and flame retardant properties of self-extinguishing cotton fabrics by spray-assisted layer-by-layer self-assembly technology[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(6):103-111.
[16] PAN Y, LIANG Q Y, SONG L, et al. Fabrication of layer-by-layer self-assembled coating modified cotton fabric with flame retardancy and hydrophobicity based on sepiolite[J]. Polymer Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2021, 60(12):1368-1376.
[17] 王兴元, 罗运军, 李晓萌, 等. 超支化聚酯的改性及紫外光固化涂层性能研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2010, 24(6):1079-1083.
WANG Xingyuan, LUO Yunjun, LI Xiaomeng, et al. Study of modification of hyperbranched polyester and properties of UV curable coatings[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2010, 24(6):1079-1083.
[18] 单巨川, 赵天骄, 李盼, 等. 静电层层自组装在棉织物阻燃整理中的应用[J]. 印染, 2018, 44(7):40-44.
SHAN Juchuan, ZHAO Tianjiao, LI Pan, et al. Application of electrostatic layer-by-layer assembly to the flame retardancy of cotton fabrics[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2018, 44(7):40-44.
[19] ILER R K. Multilayers of colloidal particles[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1966, 21(6):569-594.
doi: 10.1016/0095-8522(66)90018-3
[20] CHI Y C, XUE J J, ZHUO J K, et al. Catalytic co-pyrolysis of cellulose and polypropylene over all-silica mesoporous catalyst MCM-41 and Al-MCM-41[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 633:1105-1113.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.239
[21] MEI Y Y, YANG Q, YANG H P, et al. Impact of cellulose deoxidization temperature on the composition of liquid products obtained by subsequent pyrolysis[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2019, 184:73-79.
doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.11.003
[22] 冯斌, 任志强, 屈晶苗, 等. 3-氨丙基三乙氧基硅烷表面修饰的磁性Fe3O4纳米粒子合成与表征[J]. 化工新型材料, 2008, 36(12):26-29.
FENG Bin, REN Zhiqiang, QU Jingmiao, et al. Preparation and characterization of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane coated magnetite nanoparticles[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2008, 36(12):26-29.
[23] 王世贤, 降帅, 李萌萌, 等. 硅烷偶联剂改性纳米纤维素气凝胶的制备及其表征[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(3):33-38.
WANG Shixian, JIANG Shuai, LI Mengmeng, et al. Preparation and characterization of nanocellulose aerogel modified by silane coupling agent[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(3):33-38.
[24] 张伟钢, 徐国跃, 薛连海 .等. 3-氨丙基三乙氧基硅烷对聚氨酯/Al-Sm2O3复合涂层自然老化性能的影响[J]. 应用化学, 2017, 34(4):430-435.
doi: 10.11944/j.issn.1000-0518.2017.04.160260
ZHANG Weigang, XU Guoyue, XUE Lianhai, et al. Influence of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane on natural aging property of polyurethane/Al-Sm2O3 composite coatings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2017, 34(4):430-435.
doi: 10.11944/j.issn.1000-0518.2017.04.160260
[25] 徐爱玲, 王春梅. 植酸的铵化及其对Lyocell织物阻燃整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(2):83-88.
XU Ailing, WANG Chunmei. Ammonium modification of phytic acid and flame retardant finishing of Lyocell fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(2):83-88.
[1] 刘淑萍 李亮 刘让同 胡泽栋 耿长军. 棉织物3-氨丙基三乙氧基硅烷阻燃整理研究[J]. , 2021, 42(10): 0-0.
[2] 陈莹, 方浩霞. 疏水性导电聚吡咯整理棉织物的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(10): 115-119.
[3] 周慧玲, 朱俐莎, 吴雄英, 丁雪梅. 电雾化处理对羊毛织物抗起毛起球性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(10): 120-125.
[4] 程佩, 傅佳佳, 王蕾, 张建祥, 张凯, 高卫东. 预处理对棉织物免烫整理效果的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(09): 126-130.
[5] 张帆, 张国波, 赵宇新, 张儒, 阳海, 王世豪, 汪南方. 催化氧化皂洗在涤纶/棉织物一浴染色中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(09): 97-103.
[6] 李维斌, 张程, 刘军. 超疏水棉织物制备及其在油水过滤分离中应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(08): 109-114.
[7] 张超, 蒋之铭, 朱少彤, 张晨曦, 朱平. 超支化磷酰胺在粘胶织物阻燃整理中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 39-45.
[8] 张姣姣, 李雨洋, 刘云, 董朝红, 朱平. 棉/粘胶混纺织物的阻燃抗菌整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 31-38.
[9] 郭恒, 黄宏博, 姚金波, 姜会钰, 夏治刚, 王运利. 家庭洗涤对免烫棉织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 129-136.
[10] 陈小文, 吴伟, 钟毅, 徐红, 毛志平. 棉织物的活性染料低含水率焙蒸固色工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 115-122.
[11] 张华, 张杰, 高燕. 液氨处理对锦纶/棉混纺织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(06): 128-132.
[12] 赵永芳, 钱建华, 孙丽颖, 彭慧敏, 梅敏. 银纳米线改性棉织物的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(05): 115-121.
[13] 李永贺, 瞿凌曦, 徐壁, 蔡再生, 葛凤燕. 生物基聚对苯二甲酸丙二醇酯织物的阻燃与三防一步法泡沫整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(04): 8-15.
[14] 王华清, 闫红强. 生物基三组分自组装涂层构筑及其对苎麻织物的阻燃改性[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(04): 132-138.
[15] 周颖雨, 王锐, 靳高岭, 王文庆. 光诱导表面改性技术在织物阻燃中的应用研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(03): 181-189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!